Jump to content

Nashville Orioles???


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, survivedc said:

While it’s true that the population as a whole has been declining, the millennial population as well as the concentration of that population in waterfront neighborhoods (Federal Hill, Canton, Fells Pt) has continued to climb. 

I think it’s reasonable to expect that in the next decade this will have a spillover effect outside of these 3 neighborhoods, and the population as a whole will hopefully turn around.

I was just in Harbor East this weekend (i.e., near Central Ave.) and noticed that they were building a TON of new condos. They wouldn't be building them if they didn't think they could sell / rent them. Agree with you 100%. The nicer parts of the City are continuing to grow. It's just a shame there's such a hard divide between good Baltimore (East) and bad Baltimore (West). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

Also, many East Coast cities, like Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Atlanta are rapidly growing, as more and more college-educated millennials opt to buy houses in and around them, instead of moving out to the suburbs.

This statement isn’t remotely close to the truth in the case of Baltimore.  The city continues to hemorrhage people, the housing market is declining.  I’m all for keeping the O’s here, but there are facts and then there is this statement.  I’ve lived here for 43 years.  I own two houses, one of which I spent 6 months trying to sell unsuccessfully because the rental market is strong.  The market for home sales keeps showing home values decreasing while home values in the rest of the country increases.  Sure millennials are renting but they are putting roots down in the community.  

As for the article, I think it’s mainly clickbait.  Camden Yards is a crown jewel in the pantheon of ballparks.  The Baltimore media market is a top 30 market in the US and that doesn’t factor in the greater viewing area reaching from Harrisburg/York extending down to Charlotte.  Remove Baltimore from MLB and you risk a huge potential boycott of the game which certainly would impact the bottom line as these fans allegiances certainly would not transfer geographically if at all.

I believe expansion is a greater possibility at this point for Nashville, Vegas, or San Antonio as I believe MLB would look more to add to its base than risk potentially turning off one of the biggest media markets in the country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TINSTAAPP said:

FWIW, the Baltimore Post-Examiner is owned by Phillip Anschutz who is known for owning newspapers that are right-wing tabloids. 

What does an article that speculates on a potential franchise moving have to do with the owner of the paper and his political views? 

There’s no political slant to the story. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

This is probably going to turn into a crime thread but it’s true. All we do is talk about numbers and statistics here, well the numbers don’t lie here either. 

Yeah but the crime isn’t happening with much frequency around the stadiums. OPACY isn’t on the west side. But not coming to spend money downtown is only going to exacerbate the problem. The county depends on the city, they have a symbiotic relationship, so we need to look out for each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

i think Locust Point is the fastest growing among millennials.  The city needs some new people in government. Been terrible for years.

100%. I often lump Locust Point and Fed together for simplicity but LP is definitely unique. Was over there a few weeks ago and was blown away by the amount of young families with kids I saw out and about.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weams said:

Without a lease? No. I've been a poster who has warned about 2021 for a long while. I was a Portland speculator myself. But I'd go see them in Nashville. Or Asheville. 

Court of public opinion then...antitrust legislation, hearings,  saber rattling...this ain’t the NFL with the Indianapolis Colts  or the NBA with the Utah Jazz ..MLB’s brand overall involves history, continuity and myth much more than the other sports .not to be had in Nashville Orioles...or Charlotte ...and Asheville is a way too small location

Expansion?  Sure...OK...but an empty Camden Yards and a ghostly presence left in the birthplace of Babe Ruth?   Nah... 

And if they left?...under no circumstances would I ever watch, set foot in or have anything to do with MLB ever again.   It took me until the first Super Bowl and my son having an interest to root for the Ravens, but, before then I had nothing to do with the NFL after the Colts left...and my heart for the Baltimore Orioles is even infinitely larger than it was for the Baltimore Colts....it would never be possible for me. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are walking a fine line on politics in this post. I won't delete any, but let's keep it to the Orioles. It's fine to talk about the problems of Baltimore with discussing it's leadership or the types of news organization which ends up political.

Thank you for your cooperation.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Court of public opinion then...antitrust legislation, hearings,  saber rattling...this ain’t the NFL with the Indianapolis Colts  or the NBA with the Utah Jazz ..MLB’s brand overall involves history, continuity and myth much more than the other sports .not to be had in Nashville Orioles...or Charlotte ...and Asheville is a way too small location

Expansion?  Sure...OK...but an empty Camden Yards and a ghostly presence left in the birthplace of Babe Ruth?   Nah... 

And if they left?...under no circumstances would I ever watch, set foot in or have anything to do with MLB ever again.   It took me until the first Super Bowl and my son having an interest to root for the Ravens, but, before then I had nothing to do with the NFL after the Colts left...and my heart for the Baltimore Orioles is even infinitely larger than it was for the Baltimore Colts....it would never be possible for me. 

 

I think history of a fanbase plays a much larger role than many would assume.  In any sport, but perhaps more in baseball.  It takes a very long time for a franchise to develop deep roots, to develop the resiliency to overcome down periods, to have long shared memories.  There has been a team called the Baltimore Orioles for all but a small handful of seasons (I think just 1900 and 1915) since 1882.  You can't invent that overnight, and no team in Nashville or Las Vegas is going to have that cultural history until the mid 2100s.  I would hope MLB isn't so short-sighted as to allow that to disappear because the team and the city are having something of a temporary down period.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...