Jump to content

Nashville Orioles???


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Camden Yards lease up 2021. John Angelos and his wife have a house there. 

I've heard this rumor last year once Peter Angelos was no longer running things. Let's hope some local ownership will step up and keep the Orioles in Baltimore. With all the negative surrounding this city, losing the Orioles would be huge. 

https://baltimorepostexaminer.com/nashville-orioles-baltimore-needs-a-local-buyer-to-step-up-to-the-plate/2019/08/11?fbclid=IwAR2-WYsFOxg4IOpBmCT9pb9FAXCA3LWWviPyV-vMcaFrsdlM9QRUM4R4YV4

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

IF MLB were to ever leave Camden Yards without a team, I'm done with the game.   Period.

That said, all the rumors we've heard is that MLB would rather be done with the Angelos family.  I have very strong doubts they'd allow them to move the team to Nashville.

Sounds more like some gamesmanship from the Angelos family to either pressure the city to make the lease relationship even more team friendly in 2021... or to spur interest from potential local buyers.

As to Nashville, from a strictly business sense... Baseball America did a cursory analysis of the city for potential expansion awhile back. Certainly didn’t seem like a hot spot. Link below.

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/examining-nashville-as-a-possible-city-for-mlb-expansion/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Attendance began serious fall-off when major league baseball brought a team back to Washington. This drained off patrons from the D.C. suburbs who had made the Orioles their “home” team in the years when Washington had no team.

Since the Nationals started playing, in 2005, Orioles’ attendance has steadily slipped. Of 15 American League teams, the Orioles rank 14th in attendance.


This is lazy writing and has been debunked here numerous times.  Check the attendance records and get back to us.  Attendance was slipping several years before 2005.  33.8% drop from 1997 to 2003 seems "serious" to me. 
Pre-Nationals

1997    3,711,132    0
1998    3,684,650    -26,482
1999    3,433,150    -277,982
2000    3,297,031    -414,101
2001    3,094,841    -616,291
2002    2,682,439    -1,028,693
2003    2,454,523    -1,256,609
2004    2,744,018    -967,114

I'm not saying the Nationals had zero effect, but you also have to consider the W/L record and 14 straight years of losing.
 

1997    3,711,132    98    64
1998    3,684,650    79    83
1999    3,433,150    78    84
2000    3,297,031    74    88
2001    3,094,841    63    98
2002    2,682,439    67    95
2003    2,454,523    71    91
2004    2,744,018    78    84
2005    2,624,740    74    88
2006    2,153,139    70    92
2007    2,164,822    69    93
2008    1,950,075    68    93
2009    1,907,163    64    98
2010    1,733,019    66    96
2011    1,755,461    69    93
2012    2,102,240    93    69
2013    2,357,561    85    77
2014    2,464,473    96    66
2015    2,281,202    81    81
2016    2,172,344    89    73
2017    2,028,424    75    87
2018    1,564,192    47    115
2019    1,045,273    38    78

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be beyond horrible.   But it seems extraordinarily unlikely, if for no reason other than that baseball has had only 1 relocation in the last 47 years and that was the move of the Expos to Washington in 2005.  Which was a very special situation.   If the sons or wife want to sell, there will be a local buyer I hope. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

This would be beyond horrible.   But it seems extraordinarily unlikely, if for no reason other than that baseball has had only 1 relocation in the last 47 years and that was the move of the Expos to Washington in 2005.  Which was a very special situation.   If the sons or wife want to sell, there will be a local buyer I hope. 

I have a hard time seeing Baltimore being without a baseball team for long if the Orioles end up moving. Stuart Sternberg would move the Rays to Baltimore in a heartbeat if Camden Yards became available. Imagine having the Rays front office here in Baltimore with a much bigger payroll to work with at their disposal. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TINSTAAPP said:

I have a hard time seeing Baltimore being without a baseball team for long if the Orioles end up moving. Stuart Sternberg would move the Rays to Baltimore in a heartbeat if Camden Yards became available. Imagine having the Rays front office here in Baltimore with a much bigger payroll to work with at their disposal. 

Still....one would think that there would likely be a lot of litigation given how much Maryland has invested in Camden Yards if they just up and left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Still....one would think that there would likely be a lot of litigation given how much Maryland has invested in Camden Yards if they just up and left. 

The city of Nashville will also have to publically finance a new stadium and I have a hard time seeing that happening. And if Nashville does use public funds to build a new stadium, why not go after the Rays or A's instead of the Orioles? Those two teams have far superior front offices and have had a lot more success over the past 10-15 years than the Orioles have. I'm sure Sternberg would be more than happy to move the Rays to Nashville if they gave him a new stadium. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

This would be beyond horrible.   But it seems extraordinarily unlikely, if for no reason other than that baseball has had only 1 relocation in the last 47 years and that was the move of the Expos to Washington in 2005.  Which was a very special situation.   If the sons or wife want to sell, there will be a local buyer I hope. 

I agree with this! It almost literally takes an act of the Almighty to get MLB to approve a team moving to another city.

All we need is a good sustained pipeline of talent and O's fans will be back in droves. Just need some exciting players with a little knack for clutch plays.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it would end up being the Las Vegas Orioles (or some other name) and MLB will just try to forget that Mr. Angelos ever existed.

Actually I have worried this for a while.

Attendance isn’t exactly soaring, and the city’s “safety” has become a national punchline.

The Chris Davis albatross isn’t helping, either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB would probably like a scenario in which the O's move for 2022 and get replaced in 2027 by the Rays (their lease ends in 2026), because it would end the MASN problem. 

I'd prefer them to sell to new owners who have no desire to move the team, regardless of where those owners live. But if the team is moved, Baltimore should negotiate for rights to retain the name Orioles so we don't have another Colts debacle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

What? This is an article about the Orioles potentially moving. How is this misinformation? The giant question marks provide the questioning portion to start the discussion. Feel free to ignore if this is too much for you.

Anyone who has spent more than 5 seconds researching the situation in Nashville knows that it's not happening. Posting an article that says it could happen because ONE of the Angelos' sons have a house in Nashville is, yes, irresponsible.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I just couldn't do 8 years. Having visions of Chris Davis. Paying him to sit on his couch.
    • I agree. I would do that in a heartbeat.
    • I do remember I liked Ron Luciano.
    • So it’s better to have a top 50 prospect sitting on the bench versus guys that could actually fill a role and be a late game sub?  Keep in mind that they were good enough for two of the best teams in MLB last year.  This fan base is becoming entitled. I guess for the bullpen it’s Mason Miller/Josh Hader or bust. 
    • 8/210 isn’t getting him. Thats just offer 26M a year. I said I would go 5/200. Go big on the AAV and lower on the years, in hopes to get 2-3 very good to elite years. If Im doing 5/200, it would be hard to not do 8/210.
    • It's a bit of a hot take, admittedly. We'll see. Mullins is having a weird season. He's got 6 bombs and 6 steals, which checks out with peak Mullins, but then he also has sub-.300 OBP and a .709 OPS. He's got a .310 OPS vs LHP.  So, is he hurting the team by being out there vs LHP, or is his defense making up for it? I'm not really sure which is more true right now. But if the team is looking for ways to get Hays ABs, that's one avenue they could explore. 
    • Some of you will recall the thread I did last year tracking the Orioles' position players by 18-game segments.   I'm doing something similar this year, but I decided that 18-game segments were a bit too short, so I'm using 27-game segments this year, dividing the season into sixths.  The data I'm tracking appears on the chart below: Name        PA   rWAR   Rdrs    OPS  fWAR   OAA    wOBA    xwOBA Rutschman  119 1.2 2 0.816 0.9 1.2 0.361 0.383 Mountcastle 103 1.1 1 0.906 0.6 -3 0.393 0.395 Henderson 124 1.8 0 0.959 1.9 2 0.408 0.389 Westburg  101 1.4 1 0.903 1.3 1 0.394 0.422 Cowser 80 1.0 0 1.037 1.4 3 0.439 0.390 Mullins 100 0.7 1 0.717 0.7 2 0.311 0.304 Santander  113 0.3 0 0.728 0.3 1 0.319 0.302 O'Hearn  71 0.7 0 0.929 0.7 0 0.403 0.502  Hays 50 -0.8 -1 0.311 -0.7 -1 0.149 0.286 Urias 44 -0.1 0 0.484 -0.3 -1 0.215 0.214 McCann 43 0.0 -1 0.651 0.0 -0.3 0.284 0.323 Mateo 39 0.3 0 0.733 0.3 -1 0.328 0.292 Holliday 36 -0.5 -1 0.170 -0.3 3 0.089 0.155 Kjerstad 5 -0.1 0 0.000 -0.1 0 0.000 0.057 McKenna 1 0.1 0 2.000 0.0 0 1.000 0.281 It was quite a first segment, with five players (Henderson, Westburg, Rutschman, Mountcastle and Cowser) tracking at 1.0 rWAR or better for the segment, and three (Henderson, Cowser, Westburg) tracking at 1.0 fWAR or better.   Four players (Hays, Holliday, Urias, Kjerstad) were in negative territory, but the positives way outweigh the negatives.  Not coincidentally, the O's went 17-10 during the segment. Looking at wOBA vs. xwOBA, the ridiculous stat is that even at .403 wOBA (3rd best on the team), Ryan O'Hearn is underperforming his xwOBA by 99 points.   He's just been hitting the ball on the nose at a ridiculous rate. On defense, there are some major disagreements between Rdrs (which feeds into rWAR) and OAA (which feeds into fWAR).  Rdrs rates Mountcastle at +1 while OAA has him at -3; Holliday is at -1 Rdrs and +3 OAA; and Cowser is at 0 Rdrs and +3 OAA.   I must say, my "eye test" is more in agreement with Rdrs than OAA in all three cases.  (Note: there is no OAA for catchers, so I'm using Fangraphs' overall defense metric there for Rutschman and McCann.) It will be interesting to follow the ups and downs of the players as the season progresses.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...