Jump to content

What will Villar's trade value be this off-season?


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildbillhiccup said:

There is ZERO chance they get that type of return for Villar. Zero. And they're not getting it at the deadline either. You're asking for a Machado like return just to put things in context. 

Villar's surplus value is maybe $6-8M.  You're not getting six years each of two reasonably good prospects for that.  You might get one guy ranked #10 in a decent farm system.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Villar's surplus value is maybe $6-8M.  You're not getting six years each of two reasonably good prospects for that.  You might get one guy ranked #10 in a decent farm system.

I'd be after one Organizational top 10, one 20-30, and a lottery ticket. If no one wants to pay that then keep him on a modest 2-3 year deal at 5.5-6.5 per.

 

i saw the Indians mentioned....Perhaps Bracho, Civale, and a 18 year old international kid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

I'd be after one Organizational top 10, one 20-30, and a lottery ticket. If no one wants to pay that then keep him on a modest 2-3 year deal at 5.5-6.5 per.

 

i saw the Indians mentioned....Perhaps Bracho, Civale, and a 18 year old international kid

So you're basically committing to just keeping Villar if that's your asking price. It's like saying your Honda Civic is for sale and then listing an asking price of $50,000. And why wouldn't the Indians just try to convert one of their SS prospects to 2B? And they could use Mike Freeman to bridge the gap. He's been pretty solid in limited action (.368 OBP). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Villar's surplus value is maybe $6-8M.  You're not getting six years each of two reasonably good prospects for that.  You might get one guy ranked #10 in a decent farm system.

 

Even that seems like a stretch to me. I'm just hard pressed to believe there's going to be a demand for Villar until I actually see it or hear it. I can't recall a single trade rumor surrounding him since his been an Oriole. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

 

Even that seems like a stretch to me. I'm just hard pressed to believe there's going to be a demand for Villar until I actually see it or hear it. I can't recall a single trade rumor surrounding him since his been an Oriole. 

 

I believe his actual production as measured by tangible metrics, contract situation, and age over a general feeling that he's not a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

 

Even that seems like a stretch to me. I'm just hard pressed to believe there's going to be a demand for Villar until I actually see it or hear it. I can't recall a single trade rumor surrounding him since his been an Oriole. 

 

That doesn’t seem like too much of a stretch to me.   We certainly traded guys who were in the bottom half of our top 10 for rentals of less than a year on several occasions.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

 And one more thing, Villar's OPS+ is 109. With offense up in MLB his stats don't look as good when they are normalized against league average and ballpark effects. 

I see your point, but he had a similarly good season four years ago and a decent one last year. I don't think you can blame it all on this year's increase.

6 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So Villar is a player who can only produce when he gets 500+ ABs? That's interesting because PLENTY of players have been able to post good numbers in small sample sizes over time. Again, this whole back and forth isn't so much as a knock against Villar as it is a knock against you suggesting we sign him to a 2-3 year deal. We can argue all day about whether or not Villar is a good player (or will continue to be one), but there is no scenario in which it makes sense to give him a 2-3 year deal. 

lol.. No, Villar is a player who improved and fought his way into a starting role and has not yet relinquished it in four seasons. It took him awhile to get going which also happens to PLENTY of players. I also wouldn't consider this an argument since the only points you can come up with are demonstrably false and sensationalized to fit your "Villar is bad" narrative. I also do not think a 2/12 deal would be a bad one, but at the very least, there is no reason to be in all this hurry to get rid of him. He has put up a 10.4 WAR over the last four seasons as an every day player which may still change before the end of this one. I would not consider that "bad" at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So you're basically committing to just keeping Villar if that's your asking price. It's like saying your Honda Civic is for sale and then listing an asking price of $50,000. And why wouldn't the Indians just try to convert one of their SS prospects to 2B? And they could use Mike Freeman to bridge the gap. He's been pretty solid in limited action (.368 OBP). 

 

What an exaggerated comparison. Nice try though!

If you can't get fair value keep him. Fair value isn't somebody else's trash.

In most systems a guy ranked 20-30 is still a long shot. 

 

I suggested Bracho (18 year old Dominican SS) he's their 12th best prospect according to MLB. Civale ranks 24th and is likely a reliever in the majors at best.. The 3rd guy is likely a 17-18 year old throw away.

Hardly premium value IMO for a 2-3 war everyday 2B. In his prime

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2019 at 6:40 AM, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think the trade market for Villar is going to be limited. A playoff team looks at Villar's defense and base running, and they see him as a player who will run into the last out of a playoff series. Or make the errant throw or miss a ground ball that gets through for the go ahead run.

Villar has value, but the question is would the return in a trade be enough to justify paying him $7M or $8M in 2020. And one more thing, Villar's OPS+ is 109. With offense up in MLB his stats don't look as good when they are normalized against league average and ballpark effects.  

 

I don't think his baserunning would ever be considered a liability.  He's tops in the majors in baserunning runs according to fangraphs, and over 2018-2019, he's 6th in the majors.  For all the times he runs himself into an out he generates a lot more runs.  I think you have a reasonable argument regarding his defense, but he's not terrible there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hallas said:

I don't think his baserunning would ever be considered a liability.  He's tops in the majors in baserunning runs according to fangraphs, and over 2018-2019, he's 6th in the majors.  For all the times he runs himself into an out he generates a lot more runs.  I think you have a reasonable argument regarding his defense, but he's not terrible there.

I would keep Villar.  He is a good major league player.  We have too few of them to give them away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’re going to lose 100 games in 2020. I think we should be trying to acquire as many assets for 2022 and beyond. 

These 100+ seasons are ugly, but we should be trading away guys that won’t be here in 2022+ as soon as they reach peak value. 

I do like the idea that Villar helps the lineup out tremendously. He helps Mancini. Takes pressure off anyone else having to hit lead off. Allows other players to slot into their right slots. I think Alberto could fill in though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...