Jump to content

Miclat at Aberdeen


rooter

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't know what to say in response -- looks like you were going for effect and not furthering a discussion :confused: I'll give it a shot...

Healthy Miclat = Roberts-light (less power)/Pedroia-light (less power/more arm).

Injured Miclat = AAAA player that is a ML-fielder but doesn't have the arm consistency for SS and doesn't hit enough.

Not sure whether he'll fully-recover best guess at this point Miclat = Conservative estimate of a middle-of-the-road hitter whose command of the strikezone won't help him as much if his bat speed isn't all-the-way there and pitchers can come right at him. Fringy-SS (because of arm strength) but could handle it. I equate that to Jason Donald (again with the concession that I don't enjoy making comparisons but understand why people ask for them). Donald has more raw power (larger frame) but I view him as a fringy-SS (range and arm) that fits in best as a bottom 1/3 of the order gap-to-gap guy.

I'll be right here on the edge of my seat, awaiting your one-liner....

I apologize for my lack of explanation - no offense was intended. But Donald - as you just said - is a much bigger guy who most project to 2nd base. And gleening from what I've read about the 2 and what they've done, Donald has far more power potential and hitting potential than Miclat - who doesn't seem to be anywhere near the prospect Donald is - much less anywhere near the potential of Pedroia. Pedroia is clearly not a bottom of the order type hitter - He's one of the outstanding young players in the game. It seems strange to me to compare him to players who appear to be far more talented, but maybe I'm missing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I apologize for my lack of explanation - no offense was intended. But Donald - as you just said - is a much bigger guy who most project to 2nd base. And gleening from what I've read about the 2 and what they've done, Donald has far more power potential and hitting potential than Miclat - who doesn't seem to be anywhere near the prospect Donald is - much less anywhere near the potential of Pedroia. Pedroia is clearly not a bottom of the order type hitter - He's one of the outstanding young players in the game. It seems strange to me to compare him to players who appear to be far more talented, but maybe I'm missing something.

Well, I think I laid out my explanation a little better in the post you quoted. Also note Pedroia wasn't projected by most to be a top-of-the-order hitter. I'm not a huge fan of Donald -- very solid but unspectacular -- and that's sort of how I think Miclat turns out. Upper end of the spectrum is Brian Roberts with less power and a Pedroia-like strikezone awareness/ability to put the ball in play. Bottom of the spectrum AAAA guy. Middle-of-the-road, solid regular but nothing special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I think I laid out my explanation a little better in the post you quoted. Also note Pedroia wasn't projected by most to be a top-of-the-order hitter. I'm not a huge fan of Donald -- very solid but unspectacular -- and that's sort of how I think Miclat turns out. Upper end of the spectrum is Brian Roberts with less power and a Pedroia-like strikezone awareness/ability to put the ball in play. Bottom of the spectrum AAAA guy. Middle-of-the-road, solid regular but nothing special.

Thanks - I appreciate your thoughts. I'm a little surprised, because Pedroia was a stud at AZ State, and I thought he was always extremely highly regarded. Unless what I heard is wrong, Ian Kinsler transferred because he couldn't beat him out at SS. But what matters is that he's a great player - now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks - I appreciate your thoughts. I'm a little surprised, because Pedroia was a stud at AZ State, and I thought he was always extremely highly regarded. Unless what I heard is wrong, Ian Kinsler transferred because he couldn't beat him out at SS. But what matters is that he's a great player - now.

I think the concerns with Pedroia related to strength. He was among the best in all of minor league baseall in not striking out, which is a huge deal -- it just didn't look like he'd have much pop (21 HR in 1040 MiL AB). Solid but unspectacular average (around .300 above HiA) and very good OBP .385ish above HiA. Solid gap-to-gap power with 58 2B in 264 H above HiA.

This is sort of what I see as Miclat's tragectory if things go well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Healthy Miclat = Roberts-light (less power)/Pedroia-light (less power/more arm).

I think this is a bit of a reach if the primary support is just the sophomore year's statistics. Miclat does seem to have a nice upside and perhaps if he had been healthy he could have gone a round or two earlier. There are probably 100 kids per draft, three to five per team, that "could have gone earlier".

We'll see with Miclat. What I do know is that Roberts was a prolific hitter and was taken in the first round on merit. I do not see near-all star capabilities in Miclat's future, but a best case of slightly above average, every day major league SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a bit of a reach if the primary support is just the sophomore year's statistics. Miclat does seem to have a nice upside and perhaps if he had been healthy he could have gone a round or two earlier. There are probably 100 kids per draft, three to five per team, that "could have gone earlier".

We'll see with Miclat. What I do know is that Roberts was a prolific hitter and was taken in the first round on merit. I do not see near-all star capabilities in Miclat's future, but a best case of slightly above average, every day major league SS.

I'm not a huge stat guy (I'm fuctional in stat analysis, but not fluent) -- my comparison is primarily from watching Micalt play. I thought the stats were interesting, though.

As an aside, a slightly above-average every day MLer, to me, is synonomous with "Brian Roberts-light" or "Dustin Pedroia-light". Just to give you an idea of where I am coming from. Looks like our views aren't really that far apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a huge stat guy (I'm fuctional in stat analysis, but not fluent) -- my comparison is primarily from watching Micalt play. I thought the stats were interesting, though.

As an aside, a slightly above-average every day MLer, to me, is synonomous with "Brian Roberts-light" or "Dustin Pedroia-light". Just to give you an idea of where I am coming from. Looks like our views aren't really that far apart.

I've seen him play too, many times, and your comparison to Pedroia is pretty accurate. He won't hit homers, but he'll get on-base, steal bases, and play great defense (assuming his shoulder comes around).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • In a nonsave situation, Mike Baumann was tagged with an unearned run Sunday in 26-pitch ninth inning to seal Seattle's 5-1 win in a three-game sweep of the Angels. https://www.mlb.com/gameday/angels-vs-mariners/2024/06/02/745252/final
    • So would Kjerstad, Norby or Mayo man center?
    • Are we really sure that Vieira would be claimed.  I remember the O's have hung on to guys for dear life and then when they are DFA'ed, no one wants them.
    • Maybe he’s throwing shade at somebody who hijacks every game thread.
    • And hader, with the second biggest contract in reliever history, is 19th in average annual value just in current contracts (Diaz is 17th). There are 4 relief pitchers in the top 50 pitchers in annual salary (and that’s if you go by spotrac calling Kyle Hendricks a reliever, which he hasn’t been). Which tells you how mlb values starters vs relievers. If you have a chance to get even a  mid rotation starter, chances are it’s more valuable than very good high leverage relievers. They pitch a ton more innings that impacts the team more.  Relievers are volatile, and don’t exactly have longer shelf lives despite the lower inning workload.    if you get a pitcher with good enough stuff that can be a starter, you can always fall back on them being relievers if they don’t make it as starters. Taking someone with no starter potential limits their upside. That’s not what I want with an early pick. I’ll take all the sharkey types in later rounds, but if I get Brecht, I want him in the minors trying to be a starter as long as they think he can be one. 
    • All right I'll pull that back, he does only have a decent shot at his best year. the rest of the season has not happened yet, hell tomorrow could be his last game. I dont like sewing together partial seasons either. Last year half season started with July and August being a scorch fest followed by a cold September which featured shoulder problems and an IL stint. he does have one constant though, the defense is turning Elite. Yes bad AB today, but the more I look at him the more I see what his supporters see. I'm starting to come around to him.  
    • Hey everyone! I’m so sorry that I’m late in getting the results accumulated and a winner announced. I haven’t had time to login to the Hangout in probably 10 days or so due to life and work.  I’ll tally up the entries and post the winner this week, hopefully within the next day or two. Thanks for all the interest!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...