Jump to content

Give me your rosiest semi-realistic scenario for 2020


Frobby

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Alex Cobb pitches well enough to make himself trade-able.

Mancini puts up similar numbers as last year in the first half.

Givens rebounds and is dominant in the first half. 

We somehow go into the trade deadline with the best available SP, RP, and bat.

Detriot takes Hancock/Torkelson with the #1 pick in June, and we take SS Austin Martin.

Our young players show hope, but we lose enough because of terrible SP to get the #1 pick in 2021. 

And we spend all of our international bonus pool money. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

Honestly, even if most of that happened, I think we’d only win about 65 games.   And obviously, it won’t all happen.

Just remember that you could come up with a fairly lengthy list of things that went wrong in '89, in '12, in '14.  It doesn't take everything going right to have a good year, just a lot of things.  

Maybe not likely, but Mancini could miss 130 games with Dengue fever and they still win 68 games.

I think the likely case is that they win 55-60 games.  And it's not going to vary a whole lot around that because they don't have many players who could conceivably have a breakout.  And Elias and team have shown they can find enough random talent to keep them out of the '62 Mets, '03 Tigers zone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hallas said:

Of course, if all of this happens, we almost certainly make some trades, which probably means we’re back down to 65 wins.

The '18 Orioles traded Schoop, Machado, Gausman, Brach and they were a few percentage points better in the second half.

The '19 Orioles traded Cashner and played significantly better the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

I root for the O's to win every game, but I don't understand how actually wining many more games than last year correlates to anything "rosy." Seems to me that would just set back the rebuild and make us wait longer for a true winner..

It will be a positive thing for the rebuild if players like Akin, Mountcastle, Hayes establish themselves as solid major leaguers, and players like Means and Alberto prove their 2019 seasons weren't flukes.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It will be a positive thing for the rebuild if players like Akin, Mountcastle, Hayes establish themselves as solid major leaguers, and players like Means and Alberto prove their 2019 seasons weren't flukes.

That would be rosy, unless it means we win too many games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mountcastle and Hays get ROY consideration.  If one of them wins it, that would be amazing.

Alberto rakes against lefties still, comes around on righties to make himself a good every day player.  

Mancini repeats last years performance.

Means is in line with what he did last year.

Hunter Harvey is electric, stays healthy all season.

Davis is released at some point or another.

Rutschman kills it in the minors.

Hall irons out his control issues, is electric.

Gray-Rod is dominant, ascends to top 25 prospect status.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Yankees have more injuries than last season

That is like a homeless person wishing that a Rockefeller gets a bunch of speeding tickets.   If we ever get competitive again that is when I start worrying about the Yankees.  They can win the World Series this year for all I care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The '18 Orioles traded Schoop, Machado, Gausman, Brach and they were a few percentage points better in the second half.

The '19 Orioles traded Cashner and played significantly better the second half.

Yeah at a certain point it is hard to get worse.  Especially when you have a bunch of games against the Tigers and Blue Jays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don't get why everyone on here is in love with "potential" instead of "results." I remember last year when Means was rehabbing in the minors this board was saying he'd maybe be a bullpen piece. I was thinking, "Do these people not remember 'John Means day'? The guy knows how to pitch and gets results. I trust him WAY more than Grayson. Sadly Means got hurt and didn't get a chance to pitch in the playoffs. When the playoffs roll around in 2024, if Suarez still has a 1.57 ERA and .99 WHIP, I'm giving him the damn ball way before I give to a guy with a 3.53 ERA and 1.33 WHIP who has a career 27 ERA In the post-season.  Don't misunderstand me, Grayson has a TON of potential but he's reminding me a lot of Kevin Gausman at this point in his career - a guy who repeatedly got our hopes up as being a dominant TOR guy but never was for us. Suarez has a 1.2 WAR this year in 34 innings. Grayson has a 0.5 in 51 innings. If we had to pick a top 3 for the playoffs tomorrow, I wouldn't put Grayson as the #3.
    • I hear you on the 19 year olds. I don’t buy it as an absolute. There is data both ways. COVID is still a factor too. Depends on the kid. Each player is judged on their own merits. Bobby Witt Jr. was 19 when drafted. 🤷🏼‍♂️ 
    • Lindsey reminds me of Trea Turner at the same age. Not a comp, just a similar player. I watched Amick and Christian Moore last night. I don’t have enough to give an opinion. I thought both were interesting talents and athletes. I am concerned about Santucci right now. I can understand wanting a college arm, depends on health and track record. 
    • Wrong, Idiot. Mullins is too bad to use.
    • Re: Tanner Scott. I looked up his baseball savant page and laughed out loud.    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/tanner-scott-656945?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Check out his BB rate.   Laff laff laff…. Everything else is pretty good. I was mistaken about his stats-wise, but I still don’t want to trade for him. I just know he’d turn back into a pumpkin.
    • Eh, this was his first definitively bad start IMO. He was always going to go downhill from the ~1 ERA he posted in April. I'm still interested in seeing him called up for Suarez's spot, though I'm guessing he won't at this point with Suarez already taking two turns and performing well. 
    • Bradley has pretty distinct splits. I think we throw all the LH bats at him tonight: (If Westburg is ready) Gunnar - SS Adley - C O'Hearn - 1B Santander - RF Cowser - LF Westburg - 3B Stowers - DH Mateo - 2B Mullins - CF
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...