Jump to content

2020 Comp Pick A (30): Jordan Westburg - SS - (JR) (Mississippi State)


Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

So much for the picking Kjerstad so we could use some underslot savings on a high upside High Schooler theory....     

I didn't realize the draft was over. 

Kelley was the best potential over-slot guy IMO, and he is still there.  No reason to take him at 30 if it was unlikely that anyone 31-38 had enough money to take him.  I'm not sure I'd keep letting him slide past our #39 pick, though.  Seems like there could be some other teams that could be able to go over-slot on him in round 2 - Boston for one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

To play Devil's advocate, maybe the money for the International market came out of the draft?

That is certainly possible. I hope that it isn't the case. I will be very disappointed if we don't spend all (or very close to all) of our draft allotment. Still doesn't make the original claim any less ridiculous when we gave Adley a record breaking signing bonus a year ago. Here's hoping we snag some premium over-slot talent and that our two picks today end up winners. At the end of the day all any of us want is a winning club to cheer for. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

For what it’s worth:

“9:53

Chris: There are going to be some unbelievable pitchers available tomorrow….

9:53

Eric A Longenhagen: Agreed, some of them will need to be over slot”

I like the sound of that. Lets bring some home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith Law on Westburg and the underslot strategy:

If that pick was to save money, rather than a straight preference for Kjerstad, they didn’t take advantage of it at pick 30, the first selection of the Competitive Balance A round, where they took Mississippi State shortstop Jordan Westburg, a very good athlete who also strikes out too much and has to work on pitch recognition as well as reducing his leak at the plate.

https://theathletic.com/1865805/2020/06/10/law-thoughts-and-analysis-from-day-1-of-the-mlb-draft/?source=user_shared_article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Sydnor said:

Keith Law on Westburg and the underslot strategy:

If that pick was to save money, rather than a straight preference for Kjerstad, they didn’t take advantage of it at pick 30, the first selection of the Competitive Balance A round, where they took Mississippi State shortstop Jordan Westburg, a very good athlete who also strikes out too much and has to work on pitch recognition as well as reducing his leak at the plate.

https://theathletic.com/1865805/2020/06/10/law-thoughts-and-analysis-from-day-1-of-the-mlb-draft/?source=user_shared_article

If the idea was to take a high school over-slot guy plus a college player with picks 30 and 39, why take the over-slot guy first if you have assessed that the teams picking 31-38 aren't likely to go over-slot?  If you wanted Westburg, taking him first looks like a good idea if you're confident that the over-slot will still be there at 39.  I'll go with Elias over Law every day of the week.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Number5 said:

If the idea was to take a high school over-slot guy plus a college player with picks 30 and 39, why take the over-slot guy first if you have assessed that the teams picking 31-18 aren't likely to go over-slot?  If you wanted Westburg, taking him first looks like a good idea if you're confident that the over-slot will still be there at 39.  I'll go with Elias over Law every day of the week.

I think Law was suggesting that the savings from Kjerstad should’ve enabled the O’s to go over slot at both 30 and 39. Perhaps they will go over slot at 39 and 74. I’m somewhat skeptical that they’re going to spend their full allotment, but will be happy to be wrong (I’m aware that they’ve traditionally spent the full allotment, but this is a different year with Covid and the new presence in Latin America). We will find out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

Don't we have Gunnar Henderson as the shortstop we're grooming for the big leagues?  Did we just use round 1A draft pick to fill a minor league roster for the next 12 years?

Not everyone expects Gunnar to stick at SS. There's also no rule that you can only have 1 SS prospect in the minors. If they can stick at that position -- they can likely play anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found this quote,

Westburg passes the analytics test thanks to strong exit velocities and he was very good with wood bats against elite competition in the Cape Cod League last summer. In a draft light on quality shortstops, Westburg could sneak into the first round as a below-slot bonus guy

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-mock-draft-2020-spencer-torkelson-austin-martin-go-1-2-marlins-select-first-pitcher-off-board/amp/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Found this quote,

Westburg passes the analytics test thanks to strong exit velocities and he was very good with wood bats against elite competition in the Cape Cod League last summer. In a draft light on quality shortstops, Westburg could sneak into the first round as a below-slot bonus guy

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-mock-draft-2020-spencer-torkelson-austin-martin-go-1-2-marlins-select-first-pitcher-off-board/amp/

Ok, well at least those are reasons they liked him that I can understand - even if I think they drafted him too high.  And the mocks that I saw had him going about where he went - some a little higher and some a little lower.  Still, he's gotta make contact to make the exit velo count. 

They better have some starting pitchers targeted for at least rounds 2 and 3.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...