Jump to content

Results of MLB Covid-19 Intake Testing to start camp


SteveA

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Very dismayed to read this. Average age out there must be older, relatively speaking, and so quite concerning. Since I will be in Miami, I am encouraged to see that its mayor is reclosing to a certain extent. Superficially, the mortality rate (deaths / total confirmed infected) has been decreasing, but this is deceptive; it's due to the rapid increase in the number of cases outrunning the increase (not decrease) in number of deaths.

I think as more people are tested daily, is pushing the mortality rate down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Very dismayed to read this. Average age out there must be older, relatively speaking, and so quite concerning. Since I will be in Miami, I am encouraged to see that its mayor is reclosing to a certain extent and that the mortality rate (deaths / total confirmed infected) has actually been decreasing https://corona.help/country/united-states/state/florida/miami-dade.

This is certainly not my field, but it stands to reason that a sudden sharp increase in confirmed cases will naturally accompany a reduction in mortality rate for a time.  An increase in the number of deaths would occur later, as there is logically some time that passes between initial infection and death.  It seems to me that a more informative ratio to determine mortality rate would be the number of deaths divided by all concluded cases (number of deaths plus number of recoveries.)  The ratio of deaths divided by total confirmed cases that you mentioned results in a distorted rate, as it treats all of those that are currently infected by the virus as if they have recovered.  The number of deaths has risen, but the death rate, as you have calculated it, seems to have gone down because of the sudden dramatic increase in new cases that are currently battling the virus.  I'm not trying to be alarmist, but rather believe that we need to be sure of what the statistics we are looking at mean.  Hopefully, the day will come where there will be no new cases.  When that day comes, however, it seems likely to me that there will continue to be victims that succumb to the disease for a period of time until everyone that's been infected recovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Sorry LA2, I see that you edited your post while I was typing my reply and that you have indeed noted the deceptiveness of the mortality rate in view of the sudden increase in new cases.

No problem!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

I am sure a lot of people in Texas are trying to get tested right now.  Perhaps they should have picked a different state to train in.  Seems the places where players have a hard time getting tested are places with high rates of new infections.   Not sure why you would want your players to travel to Texas, Florida or California right now.  Should have picked minor league stadiums in areas with low infection rates to train. 

Seems like Houston is about the worst area in the country right now.  So Astro''s decide to have their training camp there?  

The tests are supposedly all coming directly from a lab that MLB contracted with in Utah, so the location of teams shouldn't make a difference as to the availability of the tests.

There is no way that Minor League stadiums have enough office space and room in the clubhouse to allow for enough distancing with 60-man rosters and MLB on and off-field staff. As it is, the Orioles have like 6 new double-wide trailers in the parking lot at Camden Yards for additional space.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I think as more people are tested daily, is pushing the mortality rate down.

It is a combination of many things, including this one.    A few factors:

1.   As you say, as we detect a greater percentage of the people who have the coronavirus, the percentage of detected cases resulting in death necessarily goes down.

2.    We have learned a lot about how to treat the disease in the last 3-4 months.    So we are getting better at stopping known cases from becoming fatal.   

3.    The cases are more spread out throughout the country, so most places that have patients aren’t in a situation where their systems are overwhelmed, as opposed to the early situation in NYC.   There are some places that may be reaching this point now, but they are generally not as populous as NYC.

4.    The growth rate in cases the last 3-4 weeks has been very large, and the deaths resulting from those new cases haven’t occurred yet.    

My best guess is we will see more deaths in July than we did in June, but it won’t be proportional to the spike in new confirmed cases we’ve seen in the last 3 weeks.    And hopefully it won’t get to April/May levels.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It is a combination of many things, including this one.    A few factors:

1.   As you say, as we detect a greater percentage of the people who have the coronavirus, the percentage of detected cases resulting in death necessarily goes down.

2.    We have learned a lot about how to treat the disease in the last 3-4 months.    So we are getting better at stopping known cases from becoming fatal.   

3.    The cases are more spread out throughout the country, so most places that have patients aren’t in a situation where their systems are overwhelmed, as opposed to the early situation in NYC.   There are some places that may be reaching this point now, but they are generally not as populous as NYC.

4.    The growth rate in cases the last 3-4 weeks has been very large, and the deaths resulting from those new cases haven’t occurred yet.    

My best guess is we will see more deaths in July than we did in June, but it won’t be proportional to the spike in new confirmed cases we’ve seen in the last 3 weeks.    And hopefully it won’t get to April/May levels.    

 

you make more sense than I did, thanks.

I personally do not believe this is round 2 expected in the fall, I think this spike is just people getting anzy and wanting to get back to normal, too soon, and a disregard for the role the mask plays is keeping us safe.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

The tests are supposedly all coming directly from a lab that MLB contracted with in Utah, so the location of teams shouldn't make a difference as to the availability of the tests.

There is no way that Minor League stadiums have enough office space and room in the clubhouse to allow for enough distancing with 60-man rosters and MLB on and off-field staff. As it is, the Orioles have like 6 new double-wide trailers in the parking lot at Camden Yards for additional space.

Someone has to perform the tests.  They could go to a college . Not all 60 man rosters are at one facility now.  Don't make excuses for poor decision making by MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

It is a combination of many things, including this one.    A few factors:

1.   As you say, as we detect a greater percentage of the people who have the coronavirus, the percentage of detected cases resulting in death necessarily goes down.

2.    We have learned a lot about how to treat the disease in the last 3-4 months.    So we are getting better at stopping known cases from becoming fatal.   

3.    The cases are more spread out throughout the country, so most places that have patients aren’t in a situation where their systems are overwhelmed, as opposed to the early situation in NYC.   There are some places that may be reaching this point now, but they are generally not as populous as NYC.

4.    The growth rate in cases the last 3-4 weeks has been very large, and the deaths resulting from those new cases haven’t occurred yet.    

My best guess is we will see more deaths in July than we did in June, but it won’t be proportional to the spike in new confirmed cases we’ve seen in the last 3 weeks.    And hopefully it won’t get to April/May levels.    

 

5.  Governors aren't forcing nursing homes to take in covid patients anymore. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Number5 said:

This is certainly not my field, but it stands to reason that a sudden sharp increase in confirmed cases will naturally accompany a reduction in mortality rate for a time.  An increase in the number of deaths would occur later, as there is logically some time that passes between initial infection and death.  It seems to me that a more informative ratio to determine mortality rate would be the number of deaths divided by all concluded cases (number of deaths plus number of recoveries.)  The ratio of deaths divided by total confirmed cases that you mentioned results in a distorted rate, as it treats all of those that are currently infected by the virus as if they have recovered.  The number of deaths has risen, but the death rate, as you have calculated it, seems to have gone down because of the sudden dramatic increase in new cases that are currently battling the virus.  I'm not trying to be alarmist, but rather believe that we need to be sure of what the statistics we are looking at mean.  Hopefully, the day will come where there will be no new cases.  When that day comes, however, it seems likely to me that there will continue to be victims that succumb to the disease for a period of time until everyone that's been infected recovers.

There is a lot more testing now than when this was peaking.  Early on only the sickest got tested.  Also nursing homes were infected in great numbers and that is where most of the people died. 2/3rds of the deaths in Maryland were in nursing homes.  Now older people and people in poor health are taking more precautions than younger people so more younger people are getting sick. I think the CDC estimate that covid-19 has an overall mortality rate of 0.6 percent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Elias knows he has his work cut out for him.  Even in April it was clear the bullpen needed help.  It looked like the discovery of Suarez and the return of Wells might fill the need in the bullpen, not the rotation.  Well, Wells is done at least until next season and Suarez is in the rotation.  And then Coulombe goes down.   I have confidence Elias will make some moves, probably rental type moves, though I'm crossing my fingers for a blockbuster trade for Skubal and a couple of impact bullpen arms.   Even if we end up with all rentals we may need an extra lower impact starter just in case someone else gets hurt again.  It depends on how much confidence the front office has on Povich and other minor leaguers going forward.
    • I put on my @DrungoHazewoodhat and looked up the 1927 Yankees because they're always the first team I think of when I think of a truly great baseball team. First of all, I wasn't aware of the run differential, although I shouldn't have been surprised; 975 runs scored, 599 allowed. So they didn't get blown out very much...if at all.  But they did have one game on July 9th where they lost 14-4 to the Tigers, the second game of a doubleheader in which they won the first game 19-7.  They also lost 14-8 on August 20th to the Indians. The 1983 Orioles lost 16-8 on May 4th to the Angels.  I wonder if Roy went apoplectic that night, too.
    • McDermott pitched today and lasted one third of an inning.  
    • I can dismiss it as one bad game and I will. Povich certainly has issues but you can see where he'd be pretty good if he had some command.  And he's shown flashes of having good command for some stretches. The book on him is very far from being written and I'm not so cavalier to think that the Orioles can fix anyone, but I just want to see some improvement as he goes along for the rest of the season.  Keep in mind, he shouldn't be here now...had things gone to plan, we'd have Bradish and/or Wells/Means in the rotation.   So while I was disappointed with how he looked today, I am willing to give him a little bit of a leash before passing judgement.  His flaws are obvious but I do believe they are fixable. But to go so completely overboard about this being some sort of indictment on the state of the team is a bit  absurd.  I'd say this to anyone who wrote that OP, but @Roy Firestonec'mon dude.  We've overtaken the Yankees for first place without Bautista, Means, Wells and Bradish.  We're still on pace to win over 100 games.   I'm not going to ignore some of the problems this team has right now and I do expect Elias to make some significant deals at the deadline to address the rotation and the bullpen.   But let's stop acting like the game today was some sort of tell-tale sign about the state of the team.  This board is full of educated baseball fans who have been watching for decades, everyone here should know that a team -no matter how good they are- can get blown out from time to time.
    • Today was just additional confirmation of what everyone has known for a long time: We desperately need both starting and relief pitching.  (And also for some strange reason we absolutely suck with the bases loaded).   We kind of needed starting pitching before Bradish went down.  Now, we desperately need starting pitching- possibly 2 decent starters (I'm still worried about Kremer even though he's been pretty good this year overall).  We need 2 good relievers too.  Ouch.  That's a lot of pitchers to need.     Today was just a stark reminder of that.  Povich certainly looks like he needs some more time at Norfolk.  And don't forget, this was the A's lineup- the 29th in the MLB...   Sadly, we don't have any pitchers in the minors who can help.  I'm not sure McDermott will ever have enough control to be succsssful and he's nowhere near ready for the MLB.         
    • I can’t find the stat you are citing, but the O’s are above average in RISP situations, in RISP situations with two outs, in high leverage situations, with a runner on 3B and less than two out, and with the bases loaded.  All of those are more important to me than some cherry-picked “bases loaded, less than two outs” stat I can’t find that has to be in some minuscule number of at bats (the O’s have only had 69 PA total with the bases loaded, so the less than two out subset is even smaller than that).  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...