Jump to content

What if this is the next O's contending team?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, wildcard said:

33% through the season. Two weeks ago the consensus was that the 2020 O's were not a contending team.  Not enough talent to contend.  Read what you posted.    Has your opinion changed?

 

On 8/2/2020 at 11:16 AM, Frobby said:

This is not our next contending team.   Could it fluke into a .500ish season and have a shot at making a 16-team playoff?    I wouldn’t rule that out completely, and I’d enjoy it, but I don’t think that makes them a contending team by my definition.    

My opinion has not changed.     But our odds of having a shot at the 16-game playoffs have improved.     You know the old saying about baseball “it’s a marathon, not a sprint?”     Well, this is a sprint, and we’re in good position 33 meters into the 100 meter dash.   I’m having a lot of fun watching it happen.    

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Philip said:

The 2005 team was 36-24 after 60 games.

We are on exactly the same pace.

the 2005 team fell completely apart after that point, but after 60 games they still had 102 remaining. We will not.

The 2005 team was long in the tooth, for the lineup at least. Raffy and Surhoff were both 40.  Mora and Tejada were > 30, a 36 year old Sosa and 34 year old Javy Lopez.   Way more talent on paper, but it also had some low-character guys, juicers and bums like Ponson.  So its no surprise they fell apart.

Edited by GuidoSarducci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GuidoSarducci said:

The 2005 team was long in the tooth, for the lineup at least. Raffy and Surhoff were both 40.  Mora and Tejada were > 30, a 36 year old Sosa and 34 year old Javy Lopez.   Way more talent on paper, but it also had some low-character guys, juicers and bums like Ponson.  So its no surprise they fell apart.

Yeah, over a long season, generally talent and luck will level out so you end up pretty much the way you should be. That would probably be the case with us as well, the guys we have who seem to have made genuine improvements aren’t significant enough to have a “terrible to terrific” effect.

I think in a full season we would be respectable but still not very good, but in the short season, flaws will be minimized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Philip said:

Yeah, over a long season, generally talent and luck will level out so you end up pretty much the way you should be. That would probably be the case with us as well, the guys we have who seem to have made genuine improvements aren’t significant enough to have a “terrible to terrific” effect.

I think in a full season we would be respectable but still not very good, but in the short season, flaws will be minimized.

Or exaggerated.  The 2010 Orioles were a generically bad 66-96 (.407).  But they started 1-11 and were under .300 at the 60-game mark.  Everyone knows about the '88 team, that started 0-21, and were 15-45, 40-win pace, 60 games in.

One reason the '82 Orioles had to sprint in September to try to catch the Brewers is that they started 2-10 and didn't stay over .500 until early June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

Reeling, but still alive ........ save for Alex Cobb's start on Monday, the starting rotation has been putting a lot of pressure on both the bullpen and the offense as of late.

 

(AUGUST 18th)

 

The Orioles' starting rotation has a 7.53 ERA over its last 7 games, and said pitchers have covered just 28.67 innings in that stretch.

They have 4 starts of 4 innings or less over the past 7 outings.

 

SOURCE: ) Steve Melewski

 

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2020/08/caleb-joseph-on-return-to-baltimore-plus-other-notes.html

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 8/2/2020 at 8:32 AM, wildcard said:

 

Yeah, yeah, yeah ...... SSS, too early and all that.

The Orioles took 2 out of 3 from the Red Sox. They should have split with the Yankees if the ump was better. And now, they will have won at least 2 of 3 from Tampa Bay. Maybe we can't call this team a contender yet, but it does deserve the chance to be a contender. 3 of the starters look like they will be good. There are a group of relievers that look good. The offense is scoring at least 5 most games. The defense looks much tighter.

However, Elias made it clear in his most recent video explaining the Bleier trade that his focus is on the future, and not the present team. I think that trading Bleier was a logical move sometime this season. But trading him a week into the season when the team is still contending was a radical move. The timing was radical.   

Normally a GM sees what his team is doing verse its competition, and either adds or subtracts about half through the seasonHe (usually) gives the team a chance to show what it can do. Then he makes moves accordingly. Elias did not do that. He didn't wait three weeks to see how his team was doing. We saw the results last night. Bleier has been a good setup pitcher in the 8th inning over his Orioles career. Last night, the Rays tied the game by scoring 3 runs in the 8th. That is just the first example of missing Bleier.

There is no way to know if this team is the next contending team. I hope that Elias gives them a chance.

Here is Elias' presser, about the trade of Bleier:

 

https://www.masnsports.com/videos/2020/08/mike-elias-on-the-orioles-recent-roster-moves.html

 

 

o

 

(37 DAYS LATER)

 

"The Orioles' record isnt supposed to matter in 2020, but thats like being told that average is a useless stat until a player has a chance to win the batting title."

 

Roch Kubatko

 

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/09/what-else-is-going-on-with-orioles-besides-pennant-race.html

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

This is a much different team than the one from even a few weeks ago.

Not sure they still make it but they obviously have a chance with NY faltering so much and being so injured.  The other teams aren’t any better than the Os. 

I think it is safe to say that not all of the playoff teams in 2020 would be considered good by traditional metrics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LET'S GO!

This is getting exciting.  Means would be a great piece of the puzzle to have back in place.  Mountcastle has provided a big jolt.  Stewart is coming on.  Mullins looks better.  Not sure how many long term answers we really have on this team, but who cares?  We are competing every night.    

I've seen some metrics on Kremer's start with not a good strike % and only 8 swinging strikes.  The velo was impressive.  If he can tick up the strike % a bit and lower the BBs, he may just be a major league starting pitcher.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...