Jump to content

If only Elias hadn't traded the 11th best player in baseball (Bundy) for next to nothing


Rojo13

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, billw76 said:

I think some are valuing Bundy based off of this season, and not the Bundy of the past few years. He never lived up to his potential here, and I honestly don't think Elias or many other GMs could have gotten more for him. 

I don't think I am.  I think a league average pitcher making reasonable money with two years of team control is worth more to a pitching hungry team than the O's received.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Really don’t care about ARB! As I mentioned, saved money doesn’t matter unless it spent elsewhere.

The money does not have to be spent today. Every dollar saved now gives us more flexibility to sign a Correa or Lindor in 2022. Or extend Mountcastle or Santander or Rutschman. Maybe that is wishful thinking but $3M is not nothing and the dollars do add up. If you can replace Castro with a guy making $500K you do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

The money does not have to be spent today. Every dollar saved now gives us more flexibility to sign a Correa or Lindor in 2022. Or extend Mountcastle or Santander or Rutschman. Maybe that is wishful thinking but $3M is not nothing and the dollars do add up. If you can replace Castro with a guy making $500K you do it. 

Or it doesn't.  We don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Not every trade ....Givens is the only deal that Elias has made that I like. With the payroll so low I’m sure you’ll admit that they don’t need to slash payroll?

I wish they'd open the books so we know.  We do have a good inkling that in a non-COVID year their revenues are less than 40% of the Yankees'.  Behind by $400M.  So if the Angelos boys told me that I have $125M or $150M to do whatever with, from staff to players to drafting to building academies in Uruguay, I know I'd slash payroll down to nothing until I was good and ready to spend on this year's wins.  There are a heck of a lot of things I could do with $10M or $20M that make more long term impact than two or three extra wins in 2020 or 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

We do not know if those funds will be made available in the future.

We don't know anything for sure.  But we do know with some certainty that a few million spent on the Orioles' payroll this year does almost nothing to help the next good Orioles team and it might do some long term good spent elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think I am.  I think a league average pitcher making reasonable money with two years of team control is worth more to a pitching hungry team than the O's received.

There's a line of 4.50 ERA relievers that stretches around the block.  Relievers that strike out nine men a game are the new AAA first basemen.  Turn over a log and you'll find six.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think I am.  I think a league average pitcher making reasonable money with two years of team control is worth more to a pitching hungry team than the O's received.

I definitely don't disagree that to the Angels of all teams he should have been worth more. If Bundys numbers come back to career normals before the season is out I wonder how many will still feel the same about what we received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There's a line of 4.50 ERA relievers that stretches around the block.  Relievers that strike out nine men a game are the new AAA first basemen.  Turn over a log and you'll find six.

That line of 4.50 ERA is probably the same for starting pitchers as well. Teams aren't gonna give up a top prospect for a league average SP these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

The money does not have to be spent today. Every dollar saved now gives us more flexibility to sign a Correa or Lindor in 2022. Or extend Mountcastle or Santander or Rutschman. Maybe that is wishful thinking but $3M is not nothing and the dollars do add up. If you can replace Castro with a guy making $500K you do it. 

Doesnt work that way Sir!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...