Jump to content

Hanser Alberto’s season


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Is it an either/or argument with Valaika and Alberto? And does it have to be? I get Rio Ruiz is a year and a half younger and I don't believe he's arbitration eligible until 2022, but I'm not sure he's an answer moving forward either and thus, does he hold on to his spot? The money is, obviously, a factor, but it should be interesting to see what happens this offseason. We should see a real shake up in the 40-man roster to make room for some good prospects that need protecting. I think we've taken a nice step forward in the rebuilding process where we are now at the point where we have a roster crunch. In the end, I hope that roster crunch doesn't nab any of the aforementioned players ahead of Davis.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It depends on if being competitive is a goal for next season.  If the plan is to secure another high draft pick then it doesn't matter.

I don't think having Alberto really affects whether or not the O's are competitive or not. At least not drastically. I just think they don't really have the depth at those positions unless they want to field a bunch of Martin/Velazquez types which would be incredibly boring offense-wise. 

Rylan will hopefully push next year, but there are no other 2B or 3B prospects that are close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, interloper said:

I don't think having Alberto really affects whether or not the O's are competitive or not. At least not drastically. I just think they don't really have the depth at those positions unless they want to field a bunch of Martin/Velazquez types which would be incredibly boring offense-wise. 

Rylan will hopefully push next year, but there are no other 2B or 3B prospects that are close. 

Sure, I'll agree that it isn't as cut and dried as I said.

What I meant was that if you goal is to be competitive you don't balk at paying 3M for a Hanser Alberto and instead pay league minimum for a guy you hope is as productive.

If the goal is to keep payroll as low as possible and secure another top pick you let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

When Valaika has gotten regular playing time in the majors he has done pretty well.

In 2017 he got 195 PAs and had an 817 OPS.  Most the those PAs were when Story was injured so Valaika was playing fairly regularly during that period.

In 2020 he played pretty regularly, got 150 PAs and  had a 791 OPS.    In the other years he did not get regular playing time and that is reflected in his offense numbers.

As a utility player he has played many positions thus the lower overall fielding rate.  But if you look at how he has preformed at 2B the fielding rate is higher than Alberto at 2B.

There is reason to be believe that Valaika given regular playing time will perform well.  Its appears he will perform better than Alberto has in the last two years.

I am always skeptical of breaking down already relatively small samples into smaller samples and trying to discern trends and make projections based on a 100 PAs here, 200 PAs there.  You're almost always better off assuming that career marks will be where the player ends up.

Also, if consistent playing time drives better performances, in the minors Valaika played 136 games/589 PAs in 2016 split between AA and AAA.  He OPS'd .722 with a .297 OBP.  In 2015 in AA he played 124 games/512 PAs, .642 OPS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I am always skeptical of breaking down already relatively small samples into smaller samples and trying to discern trends and make projections based on a 100 PAs here, 200 PAs there.  You're almost always better off assuming that career marks will be where the player ends up.

Also, if consistent playing time drives better performances, in the minors Valaika played 136 games/589 PAs in 2016 split between AA and AAA.  He OPS'd .722 with a .297 OBP.  In 2015 in AA he played 124 games/512 PAs, .642 OPS. 

He had a 320/364/589/952 in 2019 in 383 PAs in the PCL.  While I would discount any numbers from the PCL I would certainly think Valaika did a lot better that a 642 OPS that you pointed out and this is more current then the 2014 data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I hope that Elias is not that dogmatic when it comes to FA pitching acquisitions. If you don't draft them and you don't sign them, you are limiting top pitching acquisitions to come only via trade. That strategy is not sustainable. Another Burnes type trade will hurt us bad. I would to go after any of the first four names on your "not in play" list. If we are letting Burnes walk out the door, most of these names cannot give you anywhere near the production and you will likely be at a disadvantage come game 1 in the playoffs. Some of the names from your "possible free agents" list should not even be considered IMO. Max Scherzer/Justin Verlander/Alex Cobb are all the end of the line and are very likely to be injured just like they were this season and the season before that. Those guys need to retire. Again, if you are not going to fish at the deep end the pool, then we will probably need two guys from your "possible free agent targets" list. Maybe Eovaldi +Montas? It's not great but gives us a shot to have a deeper rotation to go along with Eflin, Rodriguez, and Kremer. Then maybe you get Bradish back for the postseason? Maybe?
    • I’m pretty confident in saying that he won’t be the consensus #1 prospect like the others were.
    • A question precedes #2: when will the left field wall be fixed?  I think I remember Elias saying they probably went too far, which is quite literally true.  No reason they can't fix it quickly.  I had no problem with them moving it back but it is pretty absurd where it is.
    • On #3, I would guess that Elias is very wary about going longer than 3 years for a starting pitcher (maybe four years if pitcher is younger and AAV is favorable).  I think Mike and Sig believe the history of long-term SP deals isn’t favorable and the wrong deal could derail a mid-market team with dead money.  I’m not sure they are wrong (e.g., Patrick Corbin, Strasberg).   I don’t think ownership cares directly; I would guess they just give Elias an annual baseball ops budget and forecast and he can choose how he manages against that.   Not in play Gerrit Cole Corbin Burnes Max Fried Blake Snell Jack Flaherty    Possible free agent targets Yusei Kikuchi Nathan Eovaldi Nick Pivetta Sean Manaea Luis Severino Alex Cobb Max Scherzer Justin Verlander Jose Quintana Frankie Montas Spencer Turnbull Andrew Heaney Matthew Boyd   Possible trade targets Garret Crotchet Sandy Alcantera Jesus Luzardo Eduardo Cabrera Reid Detmers Emerson Hancock Jordan Montgomery Lance McCullers Jr.
    • Is Webb anything special.  I would rather replace Webb with Norfolk shuttle guy.
    • Our SS is Gunnar, our CF in this scenario would be Cowser, and C is Adley. Hopefully none of those guys are in contention for being the team's worst hitter next season. We don't need a power bat in LF - we need to add a good contact bat, that can use all fields and run.
    • Kemp was part of it but bringing back 2 UTIL IF is blocking your best prospect when your manager covets veteranosity. If they aren’t resigned then Holliday gets a longer leash. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...