Jump to content

Yankees Need Catching Depth


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ScGO's said:

Sisco and Scott for Andujar and what else? That could be a deal to look into.

This afternoon, I was going to jokingly post that the Orioles could complete the trade of Sisco for Andujar by adding Gray Fenter to sweeten the deal as soon as they get him back. Guess they can pick up the phone now.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

This afternoon, I was going to jokingly post that the Orioles could complete the trade of Sisco for Andujar by adding Gray Fenter to sweeten the deal as soon as they get him back. Guess they can pick up the phone now.

Sisco has no value. But if we can trade him for something, I’m all for it! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Philip said:

I’m late to the party. Who is Jasson, and why is he more desirable than AR?

18 year old Yankees OF that to my knowledge has yet to play pro ball. Has kind of a Rickey Henderson build and is 5'10 5'11. Supposedly high exit velocities. I think thats all anyone knows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

18 year old Yankees OF that to my knowledge has yet to play pro ball. Has kind of a Rickey Henderson build and is 5'10 5'11. Supposedly high exit velocities. I think thats all anyone knows. 

Ummmmmm Then I’m going to jump in to the fray on the side of the people who think they’re making a trade like that is… Unwise.

Remember kids, if Dan would do it, then you shouldn’t!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

I favor Rutschman over Dominguez but I don’t think this is a good argument.    The CBA creates completely different market conditions for foreign vs. domestic players.   

Well I'll lose sleep tonight knowing you don't like my argument. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

You're right, Frobito, I can't dispute that.  

Then again, college ball and A ball aren't always direct indicators, are they?  You said it yourself, AA would be a better indicator for Adley.  And that's all I'm saying.  You're right, there's slightly more information out there about Adley than there is Dominguez.  I just don't think the information is all that great.  Lots of college players rake and don't make it in the big leagues.  I don't think you dispute that, either.

Moose, you have dug yourself so far of a hole with nonsense that it just might be time to just take a deep breath, and realize some of your statements do border on the ridiculous in this argument. I'm fairly certain you would even argue with yourself in this thread. lol 

You have every right to not like Rutschman because he's a catcher (hating on catchers is one of the most insane things I've seen on here, but then again, we live in a crazy world right now), but to suggest a sure fire #1 overall selection out of college has the same risk factor as an 18-year old 5-foot-10 Dominican who has never even played an inning in the DSL takes the cake for exaggerated statements to support an argument.

Saying A-ball stats mean nothing is also borderline crazy. Do AA stats mean more, certainly, but to suggest players can't be evaluated before AA is just not true. 

Obvious all success before the majors are just indications of what they will do in the majors and not 100% sure fire results. But the fact is we have seen Rutschman play against major leaguers in SSS and not look out of place. We have reports that he was the best hitter in Bowie last year against pitchers who have pitchers in the majors or did pitch in the majors. We have a lot of information that makes Rutschman's risk factor much, much lower, which is why he's the #2 prospect in all of baseball by every major prospect ranking outlet.

It's 100 percent fine to have the opinion that it's a "no-brainer" to trade Rutschman for Dominguez, but realize you are in the very small minority that think that way and I doubt any GM or scout would say the same thing.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Moose, you have dug yourself so far of a hole with nonsense that it just might be time to just take a deep breath, and realize some of your statements do border on the ridiculous in this argument. I'm fairly certain you would even argue with yourself in this thread. lol 

You have every right to not like Rutschman because he's a catcher (hating on catchers is one of the most insane things I've seen on here, but then again, we live in a crazy world right now), but to suggest a sure fire #1 overall selection out of college has the same risk factor as an 18-year old 5-foot-10 Dominican who has never even played an inning in the DSL takes the cake for exaggerated statements to support an argument.

Saying A-ball stats mean nothing is also borderline crazy. Do AA stats mean more, certainly, but to suggest players can't be evaluated before AA is just not true. 

Obvious all success before the majors are just indications of what they will do in the majors and not 100% sure fire results. But the fact is we have seen Rutschman play against major leaguers in SSS and not look out of place. We have reports that he was the best hitter in Bowie last year against pitchers who have pitchers in the majors or did pitch in the majors. We have a lot of information that makes Rutschman's risk factor much, much lower, which is why he's the #2 prospect in all of baseball by every major prospect ranking outlet.

It's 100 percent fine to have the opinion that it's a "no-brainer" to trade Rutschman for Dominguez, but realize you are in the very small minority that think that way and I doubt any GM or scout would say the same thing.

Tony, don't disagree with any of it, but it's still risk.  I'd still take AR to the airport in a trade for Dominguez.

A ball stats, small sample sizes, etc, reports from an alternate site where he played against major leaguers or did pitch in the majors...IMO, it's not much.  The alternative site reports are a nothingburger.  You know as well as I do that the guys who "were pitched in the majors" that were there weren't great competition.  It was taxi squad guys.

Again, he's not done it against higher level AA or AAA pitching.  You even said it yourself, AA stats certainly mean more.  You said it too, small sample sizes.  

This weird attachment to a #1 pick who really hasn't done much in the minors (again, not his fault that Covid wiped out a whole minor league season) with people clinging to small sample sizes, anecdotes from a alternate site and a college career that he's 2 years removed from is overrated to me.  I will agree with you that A Ball stats provide some insight but no one can extrapolate if someone is going to be a good major leaguer based on A ball stats.  

Here's a hypothetical:  let's say we didn't draft AR in 2019, say the Royals did.  And we drafted Bobby Witt Jr last year.  Would we be interested in trading Witt Jr for AR?  Probably not, we'd have an allegiance to Bobby Witt Jr because OMG HE'S THE FUTURE.  And why would you trade a SS for a catcher anyway?  At the end of the day, we're rooting for laundry, just like Seinfeld said. 

Once again, I hope AR has a great career.  I hope he becomes the player we all think he can be.  But as for now, small sample sizes (the same small sample sizes we make fun of wildcard for) and alternate site reports?  Bro, I ain't impressed.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Tony, don't disagree with any of it, but it's still risk.  I'd still take AR to the airport in a trade for Dominguez.

A ball stats, small sample sizes, etc, reports from an alternate site where he played against major leaguers or did pitch in the majors...IMO, it's not much.  The alternative site reports are a nothingburger.  You know as well as I do that the guys who "were pitched in the majors" that were there weren't great competition.  It was taxi squad guys.

Again, he's not done it against higher level AA or AAA pitching.  You even said it yourself, AA stats certainly mean more.  You said it too, small sample sizes.  

This weird attachment to a #1 pick who really hasn't done much in the minors (again, not his fault that Covid wiped out a whole minor league season) with people clinging to small sample sizes, anecdotes from a alternate site and a college career that he's 2 years removed from is overrated to me.  I will agree with you that A Ball stats provide some insight but no one can extrapolate if someone is going to be a good major leaguer based on A ball stats.  Yes 

Here's a hypothetical:  let's say we didn't draft AR in 2019, say the Royals did.  And we drafted Bobby Witt Jr last year.  Would we be interested in trading Witt Jr for AR?  Probably not, we'd have an allegiance to Bobby Witt Jr because OMG HE'S THE FUTURE.  And why would you trade a SS for a catcher anyway?  At the end of the day, we're rooting for laundry, just like Seinfeld said. 

Once again, I hope AR has a great career.  I hope he becomes the player we all think he can be.  But as for now, small sample sizes (the same small sample sizes we make fun of wildcard for) and alternate site reports?  Bro, I ain't impressed.

Just wanna say that I love me some OH chatter and because of you guys, I had a dream in which no other than Bobby Witt, Jr. appeared.  He was dressed in black and from what I could tell, he really worked hard at his craft.  He was actually very secure with his OPS and fit in well with his big name brethren.  Just sayin'. @Tony-OH ?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think you are discounting the huge amount of risk with Jasson.  Sure he has some amazing tools but so did Bubba Starling.

 

Barring injury Adley is a lock to be a plus defensive catcher with the ability to run into one and put it over the fence.

The difference is floor.

I don't disagree.  

Still driving AR to the airport.  Because in the words of Kenny Powers "...but I am not going to stop yelling, because then that would mean I lost the fight."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Tony, don't disagree with any of it, but it's still risk.  I'd still take AR to the airport in a trade for Dominguez.

A ball stats, small sample sizes, etc, reports from an alternate site where he played against major leaguers or did pitch in the majors...IMO, it's not much.  The alternative site reports are a nothingburger.  You know as well as I do that the guys who "were pitched in the majors" that were there weren't great competition.  It was taxi squad guys.

Again, he's not done it against higher level AA or AAA pitching.  You even said it yourself, AA stats certainly mean more.  You said it too, small sample sizes.  

This weird attachment to a #1 pick who really hasn't done much in the minors (again, not his fault that Covid wiped out a whole minor league season) with people clinging to small sample sizes, anecdotes from a alternate site and a college career that he's 2 years removed from is overrated to me.  

Moose, there’s no “weird attachment” here.   There’s nothing weird about preferring the consensus 1-1 pick, who lots of analysts said was the clearest no. 1 overall pick in about a decade, over some 18-year old who hasn’t played at nearly as high a level.    

As to Rutschman’s 2019 stats, I was not overwhelmed and don’t think an .894 OPS at Aberdeen is any more meaningful than his .594 at Delmarva or .607 in the GCL.    The whole sample size is so small that it tells me almost nothing.   But the scouting consensus on Rutschman is so strong that to me he’s a stud until proven otherwise, rather than the reverse.   

In any event I’m just crossing my fingers that the MiL season is not further delayed and Rutschman actually gets the chance to show us he’s the stud that the experts think he is.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser’s  swing decisions are determined before the pitch is even thrown. And I’ve been saying this all year, and I even said this at the game. I go it’s too early to pinch it for him because his defense is too good but he is 100% going to strike out and that’s exactly what he did with bases loaded. He decides whether he is going to swing a pitch before even thrown This is why he swings at a thrown pretty close to his face . And To be fair,he  had a pretty good season doing that but obviously can be  easily exploited
    • Cowser's progress was one of the more encouraging elements this season, especially on the defensive side. I was already crediting him with being Some Kind of Good major leaguer a post back. Between his and Adley's standout bad performances on the HBP and 2-0 count, I give Cowser more of a grace.     Sure he had predetermined intent to swing, but I think the follow through was some raw instinct as hand bones fractured. Adley not swinging was the lowlight how incapacitated he was.    I believe he commands the strike zone, but to feel so low you can't pull the trigger in that spot...sheesh.
    • I believe Elias plans to bring in two more SP's, the quality isnt what im sure about. But no question he'll want to replace Burnes. Which is why I didnt comment in this thread yet because Povich might not have a spot open at the beginning of the year. 
    • So a “Pollyanna” then like me, @wildcard and others (joking of course) 😇 I’m in your camp but really wonder if Elias/Hyde and Co. can truly“flip the script” as @Just Regular alludes.
    • So thats because the extra space in the OF allows for more balls to fall in? If so, I don't really see an issue if its providing offense in a different way. 
    • I'm neutral on it. I don't like how the old dimensions played like a wiffle ball field. Both teams have to play on it and the O's do have two good OF's so in that sense it helps us. RHH will probably hate it so very few would ever sign in Baltimore unless they thought the O's were in World Series contention. If they put it in the middle ground then the dimensions become like every other park and Im not sure I want that. At least Camden Yards plays different. 
    • I agree with this.  It was a completely idiotic take to criticize the fans.  And Russo on MLB Network did as well.  Did those guys watch this team at all this year? They were under .500 for the last 88 games of the season.....the worst team in the AL East.  These were the home series they played over the last three months: Chicago Cubs (swept and outscored 21-2), Yankees (lost 2 of 3 and needed two Yankee errors to walk off the last one), San Diego (lost 2 of 3), Toronto (won 3 of 4), Washington (split 1 of 2), Boston (split 2 of 4), Houston (split 2 of 4), White Sox (won 2 of 3 but lost last one 8-1), Tampa (lost 2 of 3), San Fran (lost 2 of 3), Detroit (lost 2 of 3). What is that, 15 - 20 in their last 35 home games?  And then they top it off by losing to the Royals 1 - 0 in the first game?  So fans are supposed to be excited and encouraged by that stretch of baseball?   You want people to show up to games, play like the Padres. Don't have your prized prospects go bust, don't have your stars fall off a cliff, and learn how to play fundamental baseball instead of obsessing about each swing's potential exit velocity.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...