Jump to content

Os #5 top farm per MLB.com


sevastras

Recommended Posts

The article reminds that we have the #5 pick in next year's draft, implying that is one of our several strengths. I'm wondering what folks foresee at that spot. I don't know the names (except for the Vanderbilt duo) but could well imagine the first four picks going to the top two pitchers, the best bat and the best power bat. So what does that leave us at #5 -- the third best pitcher, or perhaps the best speed/defense guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, now said:

The article reminds that we have the #5 pick in next year's draft, implying that is one of our several strengths. I'm wondering what folks foresee at that spot. I don't know the names (except for the Vanderbilt duo) but could well imagine the first four picks going to the top two pitchers, the best bat and the best power bat. So what does that leave us at #5 -- the third best pitcher, or perhaps the best speed/defense guy?

LSU  SP Jaden Hill?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ScGO's said:

Elias has done a good job acquiring talent and depth, but Duquette deserves a shout out here too as 14 of the top 30 prospects on their list were acquired by DD

That 16 of them (vs. 14) were acquired by Elias seems to be more of a testament to him given that he's only had two drafts, DD traded most of the big pieces prior to his arrival, and there's almost no way that international signings could have made their way to this list yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

That 16 of them (vs. 14) were acquired by Elias seems to be more of a testament to him given that he's only had two drafts, DD traded most of the big pieces prior to his arrival, and there's almost no way that international signings could have made their way to this list yet.

Having higher draft picks always helps. Anyone on this board could have picked Adley. 
 

How Gunnar, Kjerstad and the others do will tell us much more about the job Elias did. 
 

I do think the trades in 18 collectively weren’t great. Eating O’Day’s deal impacted return for Gausman.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...