Jump to content

Matt Harvey 2021


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, SilverRocket said:

 

I didn’t get to see the game today but “really good stuff” and only 5 missed bats doesnt add up to me.

But glad to see that he was fairly successful today.  If he can do that more often than not, he will prove to have some value.  Wouldn’t be surprised if it becomes obvious that he would be better in relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I didn’t get to see the game today but “really good stuff” and only 5 missed bats doesnt add up to me.

But glad to see that he was fairly successful today.  If he can do that more often than not, he will prove to have some value.  Wouldn’t be surprised if it becomes obvious that he would be better in relief.

They couldn’t really square up on him though. Good movement to keep it off the barrel. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

I thought he looked good today, definitely didn't look like he just got "lucky". He was missing barrels, just wasn't efficient.

In some ways he got quite unlucky. The double hays lost in the sun, the come backer that ricocheted off of him, at least one sharp grounder that squeaked under a diving glove and into the OF for a single (not a bad defensive play, but a break he didn’t catch). 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well no but if he had good movement (again, I didn’t see it) and that is sustainable, that can be a recipe for players not squaring up on him that well.

I haven't seen that much data concerning pitchers being able to consistently impact launch angle or exit velocity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I haven't seen that much data concerning pitchers being able to consistently impact launch angle or exit velocity.  

i.e., "soft contact"? That basically describes his outing today. I imagine it would correlate with low ERA and BABIP as well as your metrics.
Location and movement, as Palmer would say (as opposed to sheer velocity).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, now said:

i.e., "soft contact"? That basically describes his outing today. I imagine it would correlate with low ERA and BABIP as well as your metrics.
Location and movement, as Palmer would say (as opposed to sheer velocity).

We know that pitchers, as a general rule, can't control babip.  

I'm not sure what we saw was a repeatable skill.

Would be nice if it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I haven't seen that much data concerning pitchers being able to consistently impact launch angle or exit velocity.  

Pretty sure Zack Britton can consistently impact launch angle.   Don’t know about exit velocity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

87% of the outs that Harvey recorded (13 out of 15) came via the Groundout and the Strikeout.

Prior to the 6th inning, Harvey had retired 13 out of the previous 15 Red Sox batters that he faced.

Harvey had a moderate improvement in his Strikes-to-Balls ratio as compared to his last outing.

 

 

15 OUTS: )  8 Groundouts, 5 Strikeouts, 2 Flyouts

 

 

MATTHEW EDWARHARVEY )))))))) (vs. RED SOX, 4/08)

IP:l.l5 -PLUS

H:llll.7 ) l(1 Home Run, 3 Doubles, 3 Singles)

R:lll. 4

BB:ll1

SO:ll5

Pitches: l) 84 )(57 )Strikes, )27 )Balls)

2021 ERA: l) 5.59 )  9.67 IP  (6 ER) 

2021 WHIP: l)  1.552  )  9.67 IP  (15 H/BB) 

2021 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: l)  .317  )(13 for 41)   

 

PITCHES BY INNING  

*******************  

25 llll(15 llllStrikes, ll10 llllBalls)

81 llll(71 llllStrikes, lll11 lllBalls)

18 llll(12 lllStrikes, lll61 lllBalls)

71 llll(51 lllStrikes, llll21 lllBalls)

18 llll(13 lllStrikes, llll51 lllBalls)

81 llll(51 llllStrikes, llll31 lllBalls) ) *

 

* )) Harvey did not record any outs before departing in the 6th inning.

 

o

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The game is already tied. If he gets thrown out, the O's still have a runner in scoring position and just one out. You really didn't have much to lose by sending him there, with a chance to end the game.
    • Yes.  He’s not a great bunter but at least try it once.   Santander was today’s choker.  He’s gotta be able to hit a freaking fly ball there.  
    • Same exact question Ravens fans ask every season.  No killer instinct.  In the game’s biggest moments, they come up small.  Exactly what you saw today.  Pathetic 
    • Should we have gone with a suicide or safety squeeze with Mullins? He might be better at bunting than hitting deep fly balls. Just a thought. 
    • I agree with the second but not the first. If the first fails, that's an extra out. If the second fails then they just get an out at home instead of an out at first, which is not really relevant with Gunnar going to 3rd. For the first case I'd think you need to be like 80% to succeed for it to be right, but for the second like 20%.
    • Bump. Tonight's game wasn't just "winnable" -- it would have been one of the top 2-3 wins of the season. Down 2 in the 9th and we come out single, single, walk, double to tie the game and have two of our fastest runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs, with our 2-3-4 hitters coming up next.  And our guys gagged. They wilted under pressure. They choked.  Again.  This has happened so many times this season that I believe we need to consider the real possibility that the Orioles as currently constructed lack the character, stamina, -- the heart, if you will -- to win games like this. I think these players fail so often because they expect to fail. I remember after we won it all in '83 reporters were interviewing Ken Singleton in the locker room and one of them asked if the Orioles had been lucky. "You make your own luck" he responded. Well, the 2024 Orioles are making their own bad luck over and over again. How does that cycle of failure come to an end? I wish I knew.
    • I know the OH hates Holliday, but it's a no brainer keeping him over Soto. We're talking about bench players who are going to, at most, have a small role in a few games. Soto has no pop and is slow. He's a warm body as it is. Holliday's ability to run can be very useful in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...