Jump to content

20 round draft in 2021


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure. Why wouldn’t it be?  Less minor league teams mean you don’t need to draft as many guys which means, overall, you save money.

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

I think the undrafted bit is key.  Most of the folks drafted after round 20 could just be signed as UFA.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 4/2/2021 at 7:03 PM, Frobby said:

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

Or you have guys bouncing around the minors for longer than they would have otherwise - with no real chance at getting called up to the bigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2021 at 10:03 PM, Frobby said:

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

Actually, this is better for the guys who get drafted after the 20th round. Now they can be free agents and potentially get multiple offers and be able to pick the organization that he may be better fit in with more opportunity. If I'm a  catcher, do I want to sign with a team that drafted three catchers already  or one that may have more of an opportunity for me to play right away?

I like the 20 rounds. With free agency and DSL players that should be plenty and allow the cream to rise instead of drafting a bunch of senior college signs with very little chance of becoming major leaguers.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Just now, OriolesMagic83 said:

Don't teams sign about 25 guys every year?  A lot of the guys in the lower rounds below 20, take a college scholarship, which has a lot more value than $10k or whatever they offer late round picks. 

Three things.

1- I don't think that many scholarships are out there for Baseball.

2- Teams can include money for college without infringing on their draft pool number.

3- A decent number of the guys drafted are already in college.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Three things.

1- I don't think that many scholarships are out there for Baseball.

2- Teams can include money for college without infringing on their draft pool number.

3- A decent number of the guys drafted are already in college.

Each D1 team has 11.7 scholarships to give out. No one gets a full scholarship, and the top guys get about half of one. They do have other funds to use, grants and things like that. Kevin O’Sullivan (UF) told me that no player gets a full scholarship. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jammer7 said:

Each D1 team has 11.7 scholarships to give out. No one gets a full scholarship, and the top guys get about half of one. They do have other funds to use, grants and things like that. Kevin O’Sullivan (UF) told me that no player gets a full scholarship. 

A typical D1 guy will wind up with a scholarship that is one third of cost of attendance. A highly regarded pitcher would be more like 40% or 50%. That's one of the reasons academics are stressed because coaches are looking for a guy who can combine his athletic scholarship with academic money. 

And there are differences by state. Georgia has a program available to their high school graduates that pays some or all of their first year of a Georgia college. Lottery money is available in some states to pay for college costs. Louisiana has a good program I believe. Vandy has private funds they can access for guys they want. 

To corn's point above, MLB teams will provide funds for college as a part of a standard contract. They look at the cost of attendance at the school a kid is committed to and agree to provide that amount. As the years have gone by, there have been limitations on when that money is available and when it must be used, or lost. As you would guess, when a high school kid is weighing options between signing to play pro baseball or go to college, the college funds offered by the standard contract seem far away and less significant because most guys in that situation firmly believe they'll make it in MLB and play for a dozen years. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 7Mo said:

A typical D1 guy will wind up with a scholarship that is one third of cost of attendance. A highly regarded pitcher would be more like 40% or 50%. That's one of the reasons academics are stressed because coaches are looking for a guy who can combine his athletic scholarship with academic money. 

And there are differences by state. Georgia has a program available to their high school graduates that pays some or all of their first year of a Georgia college. Lottery money is available in some states to pay for college costs. Louisiana has a good program I believe. Vandy has private funds they can access for guys they want. 

To corn's point above, MLB teams will provide funds for college as a part of a standard contract. They look at the cost of attendance at the school a kid is committed to and agree to provide that amount. As the years have gone by, there have been limitations on when that money is available and when it must be used, or lost. As you would guess, when a high school kid is weighing options between signing to play pro baseball or go to college, the college funds offered by the standard contract seem far away and less significant because most guys in that situation firmly believe they'll make it in MLB and play for a dozen years. 

A really great post. I was under the impression the MLB contracts do not do the college funds anymore, just what I was told about two years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

A really great post. I was under the impression the MLB contracts do not do the college funds anymore, just what I was told about two years ago.

They may not. My information is about 8-9 years old but that was the MLB speech at that time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I don't really want to see an all in trade given the risk involved with picking up any pitcher in the game right now. I want to see if veteran players on a big contract are an option now with Rubenstein. A player like Max Scherzer should be on the table as a means to add another viable starting pitcher. I have to think under Angelos a player like Scherzer would be too expensive and a nonstarter. I'd rather pay $$$ for some high priced veterans over giving up top prospects for one pitcher that you pray doesn't get a sore elbow. 
    • I’m not an actuary. That’s @Filmstudy realm. He’s a master at calculating odds. Here’s what I will say. I think (just my two cents) that Elias should be aiming to come away from the trade deadline with a starting pitcher who is a real difference maker. And hopefully a bullpen arm or two that have power/strikeout stuff (unlike all of our relievers currently not named Kimbrel). Elias should be trying to increase our odds as high as possible. I don’t know by what percent our odds will increase. But I do know that if we add a top of the rotation type pitcher to what we have, the odds of us likely being successful against ANY TEAM in the Fall will go up. This again is just my opinion (for whatever that is worth) but it sends the right message to the players that you are invested in truly trying to get this team over the line (World Series trophy). If the message that is sent to the players continues to be “one foot in and one foot out”. I’m not sure if that is a strong appeal to ultra competitors like Gunnar and Adley. People might say well who cares what the players think? But it is probably going to play a roll (what they think/how they feel) in whether or not they are willing to re-up here longterm. And I can’t envision a version of the Orioles that is as strong and as viable to maximizing the earnings/value of the franchise without them. I’ve said this before, but I attend a lot of games and I’m around town very often. I see all of the #2 and #35 shirts on people’s backs in the stadium and around the community. Lastly, I believe that it is very important that we do right for players like Stowers and Norby. I get and I’m sure they understand that there may not be a place for them on the Baltimore Orioles. But you can’t leave guys buried at AAA for years and never give them a chance, especially when we are talking about prime years. These guys only have so many years to make money by playing the game. If you can’t use them, send them elsewhere. I have never been a big believer that you get rewarded by treating people (and that is what all the players actually are) wrong.
    • Holliday isn’t being traded lol. And I highly doubt Mayo is traded. Basallo is expendable to me. We have Adley. 
    • Seems logical with the lefties coming up. It's time. Get him a taste before the AS break, temporarily option someone, then make a deal at the deadline to jettison someone like Urias. 
    • I couldn’t help myself, I checked the replies and that guy on Twitter is saying it’s a rumor from the Mayo family but didn’t say where and he said it’s not anyone verified. So absolutely wouldn’t put any stock in that.  That said - I do see some logic here if there are a string of LHP coming up. Send Cowser to AAA for some more regular ABs, get Mayo up for the LHP and buy some time. Mullins plays CF and maybe Mateo is the backup CF or starts there vs the LHP (with Mayo 3B and Westburg 2B). The trade deadline is in 3 weeks. If they are committed to trading Urias, they could call up Cowser after the minimum AAA stint and DFA Urias, and then IIRC the DFA period to trade Urias is something like a week and would run through the trade deadline. They’d lose some leverage in trading him after a DFA, but that way they’ll know they will either get something for him then or there just never would have been enough demand across the league to move him. 
    • As much of a crapshoot as the playoffs are, I'd say a 5% boost is worth quite a bit. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...