Jump to content

Who on our active roster/IL today will have the best career?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Leaders in the clubhouse:

Chris Davis 11.9 rWAR*

Matt Harvey 10.0 

Freddy Galvis 8.8

Trey Mancini 7.1

John Means 6.9

Is it one of these five players who ends up having the best career of anyone currently on our roster (including the IL), or does one of the younger players surpass these guys when it’s all said and done?

No listing of minor leaguers even if on the 40 man roster.   

* Props to SteveA for reminding me that Davis was once a good player and that he’s on the IL.   I left him off this list initially.   I’m still having a hard time thinking of him as someone who’s had a good career, given how miserable he’s been the last four seasons.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Leaders in the clubhouse:

Matt Harvey 10.0 rWAR

Freddy Galvis 8.8

Trey Mancini 7.1

John Means 6.9

Is it one of these four players who ends up having the best career of anyone currently on our roster (including the IL), or does one of the younger players surpass these guys when it’s all said and done?

No listing of minor leaguers even if on the 40 man roster.   

I think you left Chris Davis off your list.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I think you left Chris Davis off your list.

LOL, you’re right!   He actually tops the list at 11.9 rWAR, which is down from 17.6 at the end of 2016.   It’s hard for me to think of him as having had a “good career” at this point, but I guess you have to give him credit for his good seasons.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy there’s sure not much competition is there.

Means is the obvious choice but I’d put Santander second. He has injury issues just like Hays, but I don’t think his are as bad as Hays’.

And I think Santander is going to have a long steady stable career of 2-3WAR per season.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I respect your opinion and your research. I hope it’s only $5 million the rest of the way so that he’s actually an option for us. With him making a second healthy successful start, I assume the definite details of what is owed will be talk about here soon.  He’s going to be #1 on all the sites/platforms of players most likely to be trade or best available. However they word it.  So the question is… Is McDermott enough to outbid all of baseball, and would we be comfortable with that?  Assuming the Rangers would want pitching for pitching as most teams do. 
    • Good thread.  I hadn’t realized he was on a roll like this.  Hopefully, he keeps it up.  Definitely an option this year and next.
    • Amparo made it to at least 49 PA with a strikeout but he went down once yesterday so the no K streaks are over.  Felix Amparo just edged out Adriander Mejia for the most PA without striking out.
    • they could also reward batting discipline by forcing pitchers to throw real strikes with at least a robo challenge system
    • Perfect, let’s go get him AND Verlander! 
    • I didn’t catch it myself but someone pointed out that Matthew Etzel did not make the top 45.   That’s either an oversight or just plain ridiculous.
    • You could. But I think that's harder because every player has their own bat they like. Bats aren't, and haven't ever been, subject to the same kind of requirements balls are. The ball is a very specific size and weight and COR, etc. The rules about the bats are basically that they can't be longer than X (something crazy like 48", which nobody has used in a century+), or heavier than Y (again, tailored to deadball or Ruth era batters). I think the pushback from fans and players if they went away from wood would be very substantial. I think much more substantial than the pushback for the pitch clock or other recent changes. Just guessing, but I think it would be easier to convince the world that moving the mound back is a better option. Just moving away from the sound of ball hitting wood bat might spark a revolution. There are no shortage of people who say college baseball isn't real baseball because of aluminum bats (even if they've moved to composite? I don't watch enough college ball to know.) Also, if you're not careful you could get into a college baseball situation where before they got the bats under control teams were scoring like 10 runs a game or more. And I have no idea of the underlying reasons, but in 2023 the median runs/game across all college baseball leagues was nearly seven, which is a level that hasn't been approached in MLB since the 1800s. The ACC averaged 7.5, which makes pre-humidor Coors look like a Camden Yards where every batter is a right-handed pull hitter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...