Jump to content

BA's Orioles top 10 list is coming Wednesday


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nice to see the Big Three as 1-3 for the 2011 rotation. Burnett would probably still be a #3 by then if we were to sign him, but Tillman and Matusz should be 1-2...

2011 may be a little early for these guys to be 1-2. At best, they will each be in their 2nd full year in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it surprising the statement about Guthrie being better suited for the middle to the back end of the rotation. Pitchers sporting a 3.70 and 3.63 ERA with a WHIP around 1.2 in the AL east should be considered better then back-end material.

It just boggles me that Guts is regularly overlooked. Not only does he have a variety of pitches and good control but he also seems to field his position extremely well.

obviously, I like Guthrie and wish the media would jump on the bandwagon too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it surprising the statement about Guthrie being better suited for the middle to the back end of the rotation. Pitchers sporting a 3.70 and 3.63 ERA with a WHIP around 1.2 in the AL east should be considered better then back-end material.

It just boggles me that Guts is regularly overlooked. Not only does he have a variety of pitches and good control but he also seems to field his position extremely well.

obviously, I like Guthrie and wish the media would jump on the bandwagon too.

Eh, who cares what they think? My main wish for Guthrie in 2009 is that he gets through the entire year healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only surprise is Mickolio. Lingo brought him up but I didn't realize they thought that highly of him. Obviously I respectfully disagree with him being so high over guys who have a much better upside and even guys who've had more success at the same levels.

Is he better than Hoey and McCory, I think so, but I think top ten is a little high for him.

As for Erbe, I said all along that my Erbe placement would be lower than most people. Again, time will tell who's right. If I saw more movement on that fastball I'd be more excited but I think that lack of movement will hurt him at the higher levels unless he can start using that two-seam sinker more effectively and more often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only surprise is Mickolio. Lingo brought him up but I didn't realize they thought that highly of him. Obviously I respectfully disagree with him being so high over guys who have a much better upside and even guys who've had more success at the same levels.

Is he better than Hoey and McCory, I think so, but I think top ten is a little high for him.

As for Erbe, I said all along that my Erbe placement would be lower than most people. Again, time will tell who's right. If I saw more movement on that fastball I'd be more excited but I think that lack of movement will hurt him at the higher levels unless he can start using that two-seam sinker more effectively and more often.

I honestly have no idea where they came up with [Luis Hernandez for 2011 starting SS]. Miclat or Blake Davis would be much better in house choices for that position.

I think the Mickolio pick and the idea that LH could be our 2011 SS are evidence that BA doesn't follow our organization as closely as OH. Accordingly, I don't necessarily give much weight to the fact that BA ranked Erbe as high as they did. Remember, they also had Erbe as the #8 prospect in the Carolina League, so obviously they like him. I like him too, but you explained very well your reasons to downgrade him so all I can do is wait until 2009 and hope he proves you wrong.

What do you (or our other posters who have observed our players) think about their "best tools" ratings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it surprising the statement about Guthrie being better suited for the middle to the back end of the rotation. Pitchers sporting a 3.70 and 3.63 ERA with a WHIP around 1.2 in the AL east should be considered better then back-end material.

I just wrote to BA asking them exactly which which teams they think Guthrie would be a back-end starter on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you (or our other posters who have observed our players) think about their "best tools" ratings?

Can't really argue with the tools picks. You can nitpick and put Avery over Henson for best athlete, but really, they're both outstanding and Henson gets the edge for having the better arm.

Overall it's solid assessment although I have to caveat that with the fact I've never seen Matusz pitch live yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, I've been out of the country for a few weeks but I found one part of this very confusing.

The Orioles decided to try Loewen as a position player and removed him from the 40-man roster after the season, with plans to re-sign him, but he decided to join the Blue Jays instead.

Did this really happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, I've been out of the country for a few weeks but I found one part of this very confusing.

Did this really happen?

What part of the world were you in that Loewen's defection wasn't front page news? What a backwater it must have been!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • How many starts per week for Kjerstad and where?
    • People are really overanalyzing the promotion of a player that may be on the team for a week. Clearly sending Holliday down wasn't plan A, and neither is bringing up McKenna. If Kjerstad gets sent down when Hays comes back then we have a problem. My main takeaways from this are that Hays is coming back shortly and Kjerstad is going to get Holliday's opportunity in the lineup. Perhaps he runs with it.
    • Well 708 isn’t exactly that good either.  
    • His real age will match his baseball age in June.   He could have a role next year assuming Hays doesn't come back.  
    • High school players are also less likely to make the majors than college players. Picking Abrams or Witt would also increase the chances your 1:1 pick is a bust, or at least less than you hoped for. When I say Adley wasn't a "safe" pick, I meant that the Orioles didn't sacrifice much, if any, ceiling to raise the floor. I remember the vast majority of pundits saying that Adley was the most likely player in the draft to be an excellent baseball player. A few said they thought Witt or Abrams had a higher ceiling, but they also were less likely to reach it than Adley. And even they were like, "slightly higher ceiling, much lower floor, and C is more valuable than SS." Even if more all-star level players come out of high school, in that particular draft Adley was a special player who had a super high floor and a super high ceiling. The fact that high school players are more likely in general to be all-stars shouldn't blind one to the fact that there was an incredibly special college talent available at 1:1. Bottom line is the idea that the O's should have picked anyone other than Adley in that draft was a small minority opinion on draft day, and the fact that Witt and maybe Abrams ended up hitting their ceilings doesn't change the fact that Adley was the obvious choice with the information available at the time, and it's not like it didn't work out awesome for us. I would say Adley is definitely more likely to be a HOF than Abrams and probably Witt, too.
    • Yeah, but Westburg has become such a staple to the lineup and begun to establish himself offensively I thought they might do the Gunnar thing and say 3B is yours.  No more back and forth. 
    • I'm rambling now, but the 1928 A's may have been one of the coolest teams ever to hang around. Not only did they have a bunch of these old IL Orioles, and an unbelievable stock of young talent. But Mack had brought in some old guys, I guess to provide leadership and mentoring and the like. So on this one team they had the younger HOFs: Mickey Cochrane, Al Simmons, Jimmie Foxx, Lefty Grove. They had the Orioles in Boley, Bishop, Grove, Earnshaw. But on top of all that, they had 41-year-old Ty Cobb, 40-year-old Tris Speaker, 41-year-old Eddie Collins, 44-year-old Jack Quinn, and 35-year-old Bullet Joe Bush. Of course Cobb, Speaker, and Collins are inner-circle HOFers, among the best to ever play their position. Quinn was a grandfathered spitballer, probably worthy of a book or three, who won 96 games in his 40s and pitched his last MLB game at the age of 50. And Bush had a 17-year career where he won 196 games. The '28 A's won 98 games and only finished 2.5 games behind a Yanks team that was the freakin' '27 Yanks the year before. For '29 Mack say goodbye to Cobb, Speaker, made Collins a coach, plugged in the kids, and ran away with the league for three straight years. Until the Depression hit, Connie didn't have any other sources of income or wealth, and for the 2nd time had to sell off his stars to make payroll.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...