Jump to content

I'm already over this offseason.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tryptamine said:

Sounds like a decent chance Rodon and Kikuchi are coming off the market tonight.

Down market, $4mm was sufficient to get Dylan Bundy (Twins) and see if anything is left.

If Rodon/Kikuchi do go, setting aside Kershaw's uncertain health, that would leave only Tyler Anderson and Zack Greinke from ESPN McDaniel's Top 50, and they were at the very end of the list.

I guess at that point John Means would near the top of the list of 2022 rotation options for anyone still looking to add.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

But you make him turn it down.  If he says no, so be it.  But you make him turn down the extra 30M. 

Of course it is possible that offer was made and turned down. Or that his agent simply never picked up the phone to talk to us. I would certainly have welcomed a Stroman signing for more years and dollars than he got. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

Of course it is possible that offer was made and turned down. Or that his agent simply never picked up the phone to talk to us. I would certainly have welcomed a Stroman signing for more years and dollars than he got. 

Sure it’s possible..but I’m pretty sure we would have heard about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

I know you’re just instigating here, but 91 losses isn’t 115.   Not close.   That’s what Elias walked into.   And he didn’t really do a teardown; that had been done at the trade deadline before he arrived.   You could say he finished off the teardown, but all the really choice assets had been dealt already.   

It will be interesting to see where the Cubs go from here.   
 

I think the narrative that Elias walked into some kind of wasteland is hyperbole. The farm system was far better than advertised and the major league roster had respectable veterans on it. 

Ownership wanted to do a tanking strategy and they hired Elias because he had the resumé to do it from his time with the Astros. If the Angelos sons wanted to go with a different strategy, they would have hired someone else. Elias is here to tank, plain and simple.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Porky said:

I think the narrative that Elias walked into some kind of wasteland is hyperbole. The farm system was far better than advertised and the major league roster had respectable veterans on it. 

Ownership wanted to do a tanking strategy and they hired Elias because he had the resumé to do it from his time with the Astros. If the Angelos sons wanted to go with a different strategy, they would have hired someone else. Elias is here to tank, plain and simple.

Couldn’t disagree with you more.   The roster was horrible.  They won 47 games and, of course, played even worse than that after trading Manny, Schoop, Gausman, Britton etc.   That team was bound to be awful for the next few years no matter what.   

As to the farm system, I agree it was a bit underrated, but (1) it was still a below average system, and (2) the best talent in it was far away from the majors.   

And, of course, we had zero international talent in the pipeline and didn’t even have a pipeline built.

My point here is limited.   I am simply saying Elias wasn’t in a situation where he had a decision to make whether to do a teardown vs. a patch job.   The teardown was 90% complete when he arrived.   Patching wasn’t an option.   

The issue of what to do this offseason is a separate question.  


 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Couldn’t disagree with you more.   The roster was horrible.  They won 47 games and, of course, played even worse than that after trading Manny, Schoop, Gausman, Britton etc.   That team was bound to be awful for the next few years no matter what.   

As to the farm system, I agree it was a bit underrated, but (1) it was still a below average system, and (2) the best talent in it was far away from the majors.   

And, of course, we had zero international talent in the pipeline and didn’t even have a pipeline built.

My point here is limited.   I am simply saying Elias wasn’t in a situation where he had a decision to make whether to do a teardown vs. a patch job.   The teardown was 90% complete when he arrived.   Patching wasn’t an option.   

The issue of what to do this offseason is a separate question.  


 

The bottom line is that the cupboard wasn’t bare and he was able to walk into the highest draft pool and highest picks available.  
 

I agree with Porky that the narrative surrounding Elias coming into the system is a bit overstated.

The way people talk about it, you would think the Orioles had nothing here.  That’s not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Couldn’t disagree with you more.   The roster was horrible.  They won 47 games and, of course, played even worse than that after trading Manny, Schoop, Gausman, Britton etc.   That team was bound to be awful for the next few years no matter what.   

As to the farm system, I agree it was a bit underrated, but (1) it was still a below average system, and (2) the best talent in it was far away from the majors.   

And, of course, we had zero international talent in the pipeline and didn’t even have a pipeline built.

My point here is limited.   I am simply saying Elias wasn’t in a situation where he had a decision to make whether to do a teardown vs. a patch job.   The teardown was 90% complete when he arrived.   Patching wasn’t an option.   

The issue of what to do this offseason is a separate question.  


 

Also Elias was hired late his first offseason. So that first offseason was kind of a waste because he didn’t even have a chance to bring in his people. Looks like he nailed that first draft without a lot of his people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

The bottom line is that the cupboard wasn’t bare and he was able to walk into the highest draft pool and highest picks available.  
 

I agree with Porky that the narrative surrounding Elias coming into the system is a bit overstated.

The way people talk about it, you would think the Orioles had nothing here.  That’s not true.

I also think Bundy was an underrated chip that Elias didn't get a lot for.

Bradish is the O's 17th ranked prospect (OH list) with the other three not making the top 30.

Two years of Bundy should have brought back more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Also Elias was hired late his first offseason. So that first offseason was kind of a waste because he didn’t even have a chance to bring in his people. Looks like he nailed that first draft without a lot of his people. 

You or I could have nailed the draft simply by picking Adley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The bottom line is that the cupboard wasn’t bare and he was able to walk into the highest draft pool and highest picks available.  
 

I agree with Porky that the narrative surrounding Elias coming into the system is a bit overstated.

The way people talk about it, you would think the Orioles had nothing here.  That’s not true.

I don’t know. The cupboard was pretty bare. Which players MLB/MILB were around then?  Mountcastle, Means, Mullins, Hays, Stewart, Givens, Castro, Cashner, Cobb, and Chris Davis?  Let’s not forget the Calvary 2.0 of Akin, Lowther, Baumann, etc…, too depressing to name anymore of those pitchers. 
 

That’s pretty darn bare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I don’t know. The cupboard was pretty bare. Which players MLB/MILB were around then?  Mountcastle, Means, Mullins, Hays, Stewart, Givens, Castro, Cashner, Cobb, and Chris Davis?  Let’s not forget the Calvary 2.0 of Akin, Lowther, Baumann, etc…, too depressing to name anymore of those pitchers. 
 

That’s pretty darn bare. 

Hall and Grayson.....

 

Also it's Cavalry.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I also think Bundy was an underrated chip that Elias didn't get a lot for.

Bradish is the O's 17th ranked prospect (OH list) with the other three not making the top 30.

Two years of Bundy should have brought back more.

Brnovich and Peek had “good” years though. I believe they were on the just missed list here. I’d say overall we’ve done really well with our trades with the Angels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • They traded a fair bit of depth out of the farm after June.
    • I mean kinda, but everything you list was known in June and going into the playoffs.  None of that is new.  I hoped for Adley and Gunnar to be 1st half versions of themselves but feared they would not be.  Mayo and Holliday glow was already dimmed.  Etc etc.
    • I am concerned by guys like Gunnar.  That crap show he put on for a good three weeks where he threw EVERYTHING away was insane.  That was right at the time of the collapse.  Adley was sucking.  Gunnar was mega sucking.  It all was hell.  And it never got any better.  Gunnar only got like ten home runs in the second half of the season.  The suck was off the charts.  
    • It's not the exact same reason. Adley and Gunnar have a year of team control gone. Means is gone and Bradish will probably miss the 2025 season. Mayo and Holliday have lost that new prospect glow. The farm system is significantly weaker.
    • Well, it's been 4 decades actually.  And I really can't tell you or anyone else how to be a fan.  But my gut says that if you made it this far, you're gonna be ok.  These last two years have been hard, but they have been pretty special too.  I do not want to return to the dark ages of having the Yankees and Red Sox fans own our stadium and our team.  I know you hurt, we all do.  But you're gonna be fine.  Now the Orioles?  Well, I hope so.  Lol.
    • It is but for the exact same reason we were nervous going into the playoffs.  Everything about the team was different after June.  We literally expected win every series and usually did...and then it stopped.  And for awhile we focused on all of the injuries, but then even the people still here at times stunk.   The question is can they get it back.  I think they can, but even if we never know what happened or not, the team needs to figure it out.  And yes, for us...it will be hard to expect something different until we see it.  I mean, if we win 101 games and take the East, I expect many to still be nervous even if we have a MVP, ROY, CY Young all playing for the home team.
    • What is unsettling to me is in how much better a position the team appeared to be in last year at this (approximate) time.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...