Jump to content

O’s ranked 30th in ESPN power rankings


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Projected record: 58-104 (0.2% playoff odds)

If everything goes right ... Cedric Mullinsbuilds on his All-Star season, Adley Rutschman and Grayson Rodriguez establish themselves as future stars, the pitching staff -- which had a 5.84 ERA in 2021 -- lowers its ERA by a run a game thanks to the fences getting moved back at Camden Yards, and the Orioles win ... 70 games. 

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/33647294/2022-mlb-season-preview-power-rankings-playoff-odds-everything-need-all-30-teams
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

Can't imagine that their "if everything goes right" blurb for the Orioles in 2012 led to a 92 win maximum. 

Although they would need at least a dozen more than 70 wins to reach the 0.2% playoff odds, so perhaps I am being nitpicky.

If our bullpen has the best WPA of all time, crazy things can happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

Can't really argue with their take all that much.  Pretty well-reasoned.

I'd take the bet against Mullins repeating 30-30 though.

It’s strange that so people on here love getting it out there that Mullins will regress. It has to be the most expressed belief on here. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Can't imagine that their "if everything goes right" blurb for the Orioles in 2012 led to a 92 win maximum. 

Although they would need at least a dozen more than 70 wins to reach the 0.2% playoff odds, so perhaps I am being nitpicky.

I'm pretty sure Buster Olney's "Best Case Scenario" for 2012 was 69 wins.

Not that I'm expecting a repeat of that, but it's baseball.  Youneverknow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, waroriole said:

It’s strange that so people on here love getting it out there that Mullins will regress. It has to be the most expressed belief on here. 

Well, I think it's very likely Mullins does regress.  He was worth 5.7 WAR last year, and had an OPS+ of 135.  I would take the under on both numbers.

That isn't to say he didn't make real improvements last year.  He did.  Or that it was all a mirage.  It wasn't.  

But I expect him to be more of a 3-4 WAR, and 120 OPS+ going forward.  I'd be thrilled if I was underselling him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, waroriole said:

If our bullpen has the best WPA of all time, crazy things can happen. 

Yep, that and winning 80+ percent of one-run games leads to success!

My point remains that a 70 win best case scenario is not optimistic enough for my taste and obviously doesn't jibe with 0.2% playoff odds. (although I think a 0.2% playoff odds are about right).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Well, I think it's very likely Mullins does regress.  He was worth 5.7 WAR last year, and had an OPS+ of 135.  I would take the under on both numbers.

That isn't to say he didn't make real improvements last year.  He did.  Or that it was all a mirage.  It wasn't.  

But I expect him to be more of a 3-4 WAR, and 120 OPS+ going forward.  I'd be thrilled if I was underselling him.

That’s reasonable. Not a comment on your post specifically, more about the volume of people saying it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

If we finish with the worst record again, what does the new CBA do to our draft pick?

I haven’t read the fine print, but I believe in that scenario we go into the lottery with the most ping pong balls (16.5% odds of getting the no. 1 pick, tied with the 2nd and 3rd worst teams).   All non-playoff teams are in the lottery, which runs for 6 picks.   After that, it goes by worst record.  There are some restrictions on how often a team can get a lottery pick, but I don’t think they kick in until the 2024 draft.   I’m not completely sure though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I haven’t read the fine print, but I believe we go into the lottery with the most ping pong balls.   There are some restrictions on how often a team can get a lottery pick, but I don’t think they kick in until the 2024 draft.   I’m not completely sure though.  

Tied for most.

 

Would be hilarious if the O's lost 110 games again and ended up picking 18th.

 

 

The odds for receiving the No. 1 selection are as follows:

Worst record: 16.5%

Second-worst record: 16.5%

Third-worst record: 16.5%

Fourth: 13.25%

Fifth: 10%

Sixth: 7.5%

Seventh: 5.5%

Eighth: 3.9%

Ninth: 2.7%

10th: 1.8%

11th: 1.4%

12th: 1.1%

13th: 0.90%

14th: 0.76%

15th: 0.62%

16th: 0.48%

17th: 0.36%

18th: 0.23%

 

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/guide-to-the-new-cba-draft-lottery-expanded-playoffs-and-more/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...