Jump to content

Adley is in the Show!


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, jdwilde1 said:

Absolutely.  He has a sound approach and a good eye, but then he is not punishing very hittable mistakes. That’s exactly why I am not concerned yet.  With his track record, sooner or later he is not going to miss the mistakes.  Now, if he starts getting consistently overpowered by good fastballs then I’ll worry.  I’ve said it before, if you can’t handle a major league fastball you can’t hit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2022 at 9:05 PM, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

I am definitely not saying to send him down but honest question: what would it take to get a demotion to Norfolk?

Nobody took a stab at this, what would it take to get a demotion? O for 50? Just asking the question. Certainty not saying he should be demoted. My guess is something VERY severe but not sure what that is honestly. What does everyone think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

Nobody took a stab at this, what would it take to get a demotion? O for 50? Just asking the question. Certainty not saying he should be demoted. My guess is something VERY severe but not sure what that is honestly. What does everyone think?

It would take him looking like he was down on himself to the point it was hurting him.  If his spirits stay up, he will get a long leash.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

Nobody took a stab at this, what would it take to get a demotion? O for 50? Just asking the question. Certainty not saying he should be demoted. My guess is something VERY severe but not sure what that is honestly. What does everyone think?

The Giants just sent down Joey Bart after 108 plate appearances of .156/.296/.300/.596.

But they are trying to contend this year, however, so they can't afford that level of production in the lineup.   We aren't.   Also, Adley Rutschman actually has a higher OPS than the guy he replaced, Anthony Bemboom.  So clearly, lack of production at the major league level is not going to be a reason at all to send him down.   We aren't trying to win so the lack doesn't hurt us, and we don't have a replacement who is likely to do any better.

Therefore, the ONLY reason to send him down would be if you feel it would somehow help his development.  He's 24 years old and has nothing left to prove in the minors.   

The only possible rationale for sending him down is if you think that it has gotten in his head so badly that some type of mental reset would be needed that can't happen at the major league level.   Seems very unlikely to me.   Now maybe your hypothetical 0 for 50 might get us there.   Or continuing what he is doing for a really long time, like another month.  But I don't think either of those are likely.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest part of hitting a baseball besides excellent hand/eye coordination is confidence at the plate.  The best way for him to get his confidence back is to bat against pitchers he can get a bunch of hits off of.   That is what s/b done.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Oriole1940 said:

The biggest part of hitting a baseball besides excellent hand/eye coordination is confidence at the plate.  The best way for him to get his confidence back is to bat against pitchers he can get a bunch of hits off of.   That is what s/b done.  

If you want to talk confidence, I'd argue a demotion could be worse for his confidence than a AAA hot streak would be good for it. He already knows he can hit minor league pitching. 

I think a demotion would only happen if he started striking out at alarming rates. His 24.6% K rate and 6.6% BB rate are both worse than we want. But names like Bo Bichette, Randy Arozarena, and Ryan Mountcastle show up right next to him in both those stats. Unless he starts striking out in a way that indicates he's truly overmatched as a big leaguer, he'll stick around and figure out how to start hitting earlier in the count and with more authority. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2022 at 4:41 PM, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Wynns has turned into Ted Williams this year with a .504 OBP and .365 batting average in AAA. 

If Wynns turns into an All Star catcher, you have to live with that.  He had AAAA/subpar MLB backup C written all over him.  Sort of like how Caleb Joseph turned himself into a ML catcher after years at AA. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, SteveA said:

The Giants just sent down Joey Bart after 108 plate appearances of .156/.296/.300/.596.

But they are trying to contend this year, however, so they can't afford that level of production in the lineup.   We aren't.   Also, Adley Rutschman actually has a higher OPS than the guy he replaced, Anthony Bemboom.  So clearly, lack of production at the major league level is not going to be a reason at all to send him down.   We aren't trying to win so the lack doesn't hurt us, and we don't have a replacement who is likely to do any better.

Therefore, the ONLY reason to send him down would be if you feel it would somehow help his development.  He's 24 years old and has nothing left to prove in the minors.   

The only possible rationale for sending him down is if you think that it has gotten in his head so badly that some type of mental reset would be needed that can't happen at the major league level.   Seems very unlikely to me.   Now maybe your hypothetical 0 for 50 might get us there.   Or continuing what he is doing for a really long time, like another month.  But I don't think either of those are likely.

Nick Markakis was OPSing .597 after 196 PAs.  One of the few things the 2006 Orioles did right was letting him work through it.  From that point to the end of the year he OPS'd .799.

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Nick Markakis was OPSing .597 after 196 PAs.  One of the few things the 2006 Orioles did right was letting him work through it.  From that point to the end of the year he OPS'd .799.

Agree. Look at the first month this season for Torkelson/Witt/Rodriguez.  Then look at months 2-3.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rutschman is going nowhere. He will eventually hit just fine at the major league level. 

As fans it's frustrating to see the team's highly publicized and thought of prospect struggle early in his major league career. But as been pointed out by many, Cal and Markakis struggled early on too. 

Besides, as Orioles fans, we should know by now that we aren't allowed new fresh things to get excited about. :D 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would much rather watch Rutschman battle to figure it out at the Major League level than watch Bemboom or more Chirinos. If I remember correctly, he was a bit slower adapting at each level before dominating. I have faith that he'll be fine. 

On a side note, what would it take to have Nottingham promoted as his backup in place of Chirinos. I know the team loves the veteran presence and defense for Chirinos, but Nottingham has been hitting well in AAA and is just 27. I don't think he'll be anything great in the Majors, but (depending on his defense) he would seem the only candidate anywhere close to be a legit backup to Rutschman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also remember Cal Ripken went 5-for-40 with no extra base hits and one walk in his 1981 callup.  OPS'd .278 (-19 OPS+). Then started '82 hitting .165/.185/.304 through May 9th. 

So in his first 47 games and 122 PAs he was OPSing .419, or way worse than 2018 Chris Davis.  He figured it out.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Also remember Cal Ripken went 5-for-40 with no extra base hits and one walk in his 1981 callup.  OPS'd .278 (-19 OPS+). Then started '82 hitting .165/.185/.304 through May 9th. 

So in his first 47 games and 122 PAs he was OPSing .419, or way worse than 2018 Chris Davis.  He figured it out.

Unfortunately we did not have the Orioles Hangout to document his failure as a ballplayer and probably a person. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...