Jump to content

Rutschman vs Witt


Filmstudy

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No it doesn’t but, normally speaking, effort and practice does equal defense and if you can combine that with athleticism, you should be ok.

https://www.prospectslive.com/scoutingreports/bobby-witt-jr
 

They like his defense.

 

https://www.royalsreview.com/platform/amp/2022/8/10/23206867/it-is-time-to-talk-about-bobby-witt-jr-s-defense

Good breakdown here and references multiple outlets saying he’s a good defender.

I don't know what to tell you, but DRS, OAA, and UZR all have him as a well below average fielder this year.  And it's really hard to tease anything meaningful out of traditional minor league fielding data, but his minor league range factor at short was even lower than his MLB.

Completely a guess, but it sounds like he's really athletic and toolsy and looks good, but just it just hasn't translated to a lot of outs.

The Statcast breakdowns make it look like he's okay going in and back on balls, but really lacking in lateral range.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't know what to tell you, but DRS, OAA, and UZR all have him as a well below average fielder this year.  And it's really hard to tease anything meaningful out of traditional minor league fielding data, but his minor league range factor at short was even lower than his MLB.

Completely a guess, but it sounds like he's really athletic and toolsy and looks good, but just it just hasn't translated to a lot of outs.

The Statcast breakdowns make it look like he's okay going in and back on balls, but really lacking in lateral range.

Sounds like a candidate to move to CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't know what to tell you, but DRS, OAA, and UZR all have him as a well below average fielder this year.  And it's really hard to tease anything meaningful out of traditional minor league fielding data, but his minor league range factor at short was even lower than his MLB.

Completely a guess, but it sounds like he's really athletic and toolsy and looks good, but just it just hasn't translated to a lot of outs.

The Statcast breakdowns make it look like he's okay going in and back on balls, but really lacking in lateral range.

I think what SG is saying is that Witt may have had a bad defensive season but with his tools he shouldn’t be an inherently bad defender down the road.  I’ll cut Witt some slack because he’s a rookie who spent a shorter than normal amount of time in the minors.  Most infielders come to the majors only after 3 years or so of working out the kinks in the minors.   (Counterpoint: Manny Machado, who was awesome from day one despite limited MiL time and virtually none at 3B.)  But, we’ll see if he improves next year.  And, we’ll see where Henderson ends up and how he does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think what SG is saying is that Witt may have had a bad defensive season but with his tools he shouldn’t be an inherently bad defender down the road.  I’ll cut Witt some slack because he’s a rookie who spent a shorter than normal amount of time in the minors.  Most infielders come to the majors only after 3 years or so of working out the kinks in the minors.   (Counterpoint: Manny Machado, who was awesome from day one despite limited MiL time and virtually none at 3B.)  But, we’ll see if he improves next year.  And, we’ll see where Henderson ends up and how he does.  

Counter-counter point: there's a lot more down than up in a player's defensive career.  Everyone is unique, but I'd say 80-90% of players are better defenders at 22 than 28 and almost everyone is better at 28 than 35.

I bet if we had Statcast tracking for everything from Little League through the Majors we'd see that defense peaks at 20 or 22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think what SG is saying is that Witt may have had a bad defensive season but with his tools he shouldn’t be an inherently bad defender down the road.  I’ll cut Witt some slack because he’s a rookie who spent a shorter than normal amount of time in the minors.  Most infielders come to the majors only after 3 years or so of working out the kinks in the minors.   (Counterpoint: Manny Machado, who was awesome from day one despite limited MiL time and virtually none at 3B.)  But, we’ll see if he improves next year.  And, we’ll see where Henderson ends up and how he does.  

It will be interesting to follow Witt's defensive development. I'm actually curious to know if toolsy prospects have come up and had really bad defensive numbers across the spectrum then suddenly got better with experience. If statcast is suggesting his lateral movement may not be good now, I'm skeptical that a 6-1, 200 pound 22-year old is going to get quicker. 

He'll be an interesting use case to use when our prospects come up and we get statcast data on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Counter-counter point: there's a lot more down than up in a player's defensive career.  Everyone is unique, but I'd say 80-90% of players are better defenders at 22 than 28 and almost everyone is better at 28 than 35.

I bet if we had Statcast tracking for everything from Little League through the Majors we'd see that defense peaks at 20 or 22.

That's an interesting point and one that I really can't significantly argue with, but my gut feeling would say the peak is more around 22-25 defensively and speed wise. We've seen players show better burst speeds in the outfield from one year to the next, even improving as they gain experience dealing with upper decks in the outfield, but it would be an interesting subject to study. 

Too bad MLB refuses to gives us access to minor league statcast data.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser’s  swing decisions are determined before the pitch is even thrown. And I’ve been saying this all year, and I even said this at the game. I go it’s too early to pinch it for him because his defense is too good but he is 100% going to strike out and that’s exactly what he did with bases loaded. He decides whether he is going to swing a pitch before even thrown This is why he swings at a thrown pretty close to his face . And To be fair,he  had a pretty good season doing that but obviously can be  easily exploited
    • Cowser's progress was one of the more encouraging elements this season, especially on the defensive side. I was already crediting him with being Some Kind of Good major leaguer a post back. Between his and Adley's standout bad performances on the HBP and 2-0 count, I give Cowser more of a grace.     Sure he had predetermined intent to swing, but I think the follow through was some raw instinct as hand bones fractured. Adley not swinging was the lowlight how incapacitated he was.    I believe he commands the strike zone, but to feel so low you can't pull the trigger in that spot...sheesh.
    • I believe Elias plans to bring in two more SP's, the quality isnt what im sure about. But no question he'll want to replace Burnes. Which is why I didnt comment in this thread yet because Povich might not have a spot open at the beginning of the year. 
    • So a “Pollyanna” then like me, @wildcard and others (joking of course) 😇 I’m in your camp but really wonder if Elias/Hyde and Co. can truly“flip the script” as @Just Regular alludes.
    • So thats because the extra space in the OF allows for more balls to fall in? If so, I don't really see an issue if its providing offense in a different way. 
    • I'm neutral on it. I don't like how the old dimensions played like a wiffle ball field. Both teams have to play on it and the O's do have two good OF's so in that sense it helps us. RHH will probably hate it so very few would ever sign in Baltimore unless they thought the O's were in World Series contention. If they put it in the middle ground then the dimensions become like every other park and Im not sure I want that. At least Camden Yards plays different. 
    • I agree with this.  It was a completely idiotic take to criticize the fans.  And Russo on MLB Network did as well.  Did those guys watch this team at all this year? They were under .500 for the last 88 games of the season.....the worst team in the AL East.  These were the home series they played over the last three months: Chicago Cubs (swept and outscored 21-2), Yankees (lost 2 of 3 and needed two Yankee errors to walk off the last one), San Diego (lost 2 of 3), Toronto (won 3 of 4), Washington (split 1 of 2), Boston (split 2 of 4), Houston (split 2 of 4), White Sox (won 2 of 3 but lost last one 8-1), Tampa (lost 2 of 3), San Fran (lost 2 of 3), Detroit (lost 2 of 3). What is that, 15 - 20 in their last 35 home games?  And then they top it off by losing to the Royals 1 - 0 in the first game?  So fans are supposed to be excited and encouraged by that stretch of baseball?   You want people to show up to games, play like the Padres. Don't have your prized prospects go bust, don't have your stars fall off a cliff, and learn how to play fundamental baseball instead of obsessing about each swing's potential exit velocity.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...