Jump to content

That's discipline.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Yossarian said:

The plan is complete when the O's win the last game of the Major League season.

I mean great and I don't have many issues with the trade, but that will be hard to do if you keep kicking the can down the road and plan to sell every deadline you are in the playoff chase just because you don't think they match up well with playoff teams. The playoffs are a crap shoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we're making a mountain out of a mole hill with the Lopez trade. My opinion. And if and when Santander goes it'll be the same thing. Our whole bullpen has been nails and only one piece is gone. Plus, we've been collectively clamoring to get more of Vespi. Same with Stowers. I personally don't really think the team has changed much at all and don't expect a collapse from these moves. Making room and getting some pieces in the process. 

Next year it'll be Mullins or Hays making room for Cowser. Don't get too attached. As has been mentioned, 16 of our top 17 prospects are in AA or higher. More of this will happen but unlike in previous years we won't be left with a black hole at the position we part with.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

They are fine..you could always get arms like them.  They are readily available in deals.  Every team has them.

I agree, but we really do not have enough.  I know you are not totally in disagree mode here, but let's evaluate where the Orioles are at the end of today.

So far we have moved one bat with 2.5 months of service left and one arm with 2+ years of service left for 6 arms, several of which look like potential rotation pieces.

And it is entirely likely that the Orioles and Elias are not done.  But we have a GM that is sticking to a plan and has shown he can be creative.   I mean, a three team deal for crying out loud.

So far, I am totally on board with the Mancini deal, and curiously open but underwhelmed by the Lopez deal.  IF we landed a controllable starter to use tomorrow with another move, I would be pretty impressed.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Tip of the cap to Mike Elias for sticking to his plan and not letting pollyanna fans think that this is a year they should be going "all in" in an attempt to get a third wild card berth. 

Good to know we've got a GM who's not resting until his plan is complete.  That's discipline and not chasing shiny objects.  Any fans who are pissed off about this will most likely forget how they felt in early August 2022 in a year or so when there's a legit contender on the field.  

Mike, if you're reading, now trade Santander, too.  Keep it going.

And by the way....Moose this is a fantastic post.  But Jeep it going!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, now said:

I hear ya. But then, I think back to the wishful contention of 1965, and the three for one (Pappas, Baldschun, Simpson) to net Frank Robinson. So I guess the real moral of the story is to pick the right "star" to put you over the top (and the right pieces to deal for him). At the end of the day, superior talent evaluation matters most.

A bit of a tangent, but here's an intriguing theoretical: Would you trade young Finley-Harnisch-Schilling for 30-yr.-old F. Robinson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Elias definitely isnt worried about optics with the Lopez trade. All Star closer with 2.3 years of control traded for 4 unknowns. 

Depends on how its framed. Elias might say - "Journeyman pitcher with a 6.00 ERA before this year who's had 48 innings of success and still blown 17% of his saves and who is in line for a big increase in salary that could be better spent on positions where we don't have a replacement already available."

Optics depend on perspective. The optics of this move for me is sell high to fill the organizations biggest area of need - pitching depth.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...