Jump to content

When we "lift off", who should they be trying to acquire?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

My dream for Aaron Judge is that some team (not us) goes nuts and pays him WAY more than he’ll be worth.   He’s a great player having a career year at the perfect time (for him).  He’ll end up getting 3-5 years more than his actual productive life.  

And my dream is that that team is the New York Yankees, though Cashman doing the PR move of releasing details this spring hurts the relationship.     I suppose Cashman could get deep Zen master credit if it was all calculated to put the chip on his shoulder that is devastating the American League.     Mostly I think Clubs only go to the bother of trying to make Players look bad with that amount of detail when they suspect somewhat strongly the relationship is nearing an end.

Complacent Judge on the 2023-2032 Yankees payroll would be all kinds of wonderful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BLUF - O’s really need two quality starting pitchers. I’d like a FA signing of Carlos Rodon and one of the following:

Chris Bassitt

Justin Verlander

Jacob deGrom (if he can make it through the rest of the year without getting injured again)

Adding a comparable starter via a trade would be fine too.  I’d probably bring back Lyles as a #4/5 starter, whether it’s exercising the option or bringing him back on a new contract (depends on how he finishes out the season). 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RarityFlaherty said:

I’m not entirely sure of all the rules for MLB contracts, but I wonder if we could sign some starting pitchers to front loaded contracts so the hit is bigger now while our payroll is low, but cheaper later so we will have room in the payroll to resign guys. 

Front loading is just an accounting trick. It does seem more rational to pay for expected performance but for a team that is in business for the long term, all that matters is the total dollar amount. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

One of the pitchers I was hoping the O's would trade for at the deadline, Snell, has been pitching much better of late.  6 shutout innings w/ 10 K's today.  I can't imagine the Padres trading him, since their starting pitching seems thin for next year.  Was probably a lot more possible when he looked like a 5th starter kind of guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

One of the pitchers I was hoping the O's would trade for at the deadline, Snell, has been pitching much better of late.  6 shutout innings w/ 10 K's today.  I can't imagine the Padres trading him, since their starting pitching seems thin for next year.  Was probably a lot more possible when he looked like a 5th starter kind of guy.

Yep.  And that positive “regression” was foreseeable in his stats.  It’s not a fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/5/2022 at 8:02 PM, jdwilde1 said:

BLUF - O’s really need two quality starting pitchers. I’d like a FA signing of Carlos Rodon and one of the following:

Chris Bassitt

Justin Verlander

Jacob deGrom (if he can make it through the rest of the year without getting injured again)

Adding a comparable starter via a trade would be fine too.  I’d probably bring back Lyles as a #4/5 starter, whether it’s exercising the option or bringing him back on a new contract (depends on how he finishes out the season). 
 

 

Syndergaard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snell today, I was at Nationals Park for a kids event.   My main takeaway was the infrastructure by the gate you come in by the garage where they have 20 foot tall baseball card type pictures of the Starting Lineup, they didn't have the appropriate portraits for like 5 of the 9 guys in the lineup.     Victor Robles was still batting 9th though.

Hopefully we don't flub either of the two games we have left with WAS.    Do we still get our six with them no matter what with the rebalanced schedule next year?    Those could be handy for 2023-2024 wildcard (or better!) races if the other 159 games are mostly the same for everyone.    I believe all AL teams will have 3 next year with all NL teams, so only games 4-5-6 would be different.

Now that the Padres have held Snell, still have the free agencies of Manaea and Clevinger looming, and Gore gone, his theoretical availability has probably plummeted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Snell today, I was at Nationals Park for a kids event.   My main takeaway was the infrastructure by the gate you come in by the garage where they have 20 foot tall baseball card type pictures of the Starting Lineup, they didn't have the appropriate portraits for like 5 of the 9 guys in the lineup.     Victor Robles was still batting 9th though.

Hopefully we don't flub either of the two games we have left with WAS.    Do we still get our six with them no matter what with the rebalanced schedule next year?    Those could be handy for 2023-2024 wildcard (or better!) races if the other 159 games are mostly the same for everyone.    I believe all AL teams will have 3 next year with all NL teams, so only games 4-5-6 would be different.

Now that the Padres have held Snell, still have the free agencies of Manaea and Clevinger looming, and Gore gone, his theoretical availability has probably plummeted.

ERA down to 3.66.  Was well over 5 and people here were saying how he’s not good anymore.  
 

105 Ks in 78.2 IP.  But yea, he’s not as valuable as Santander!  Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...