Jump to content

Hays and Mountcastle are the Problem


baltfan

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

If Elias thinks sending kids to Bowie last year to get some playoff run exposure is very valuable then it would be very valuable to bring up a lot of our kids and let them feel what it is like trying to get a playoff spot.  And maybe just maybe they give us a boost.   Machado sure did wonders for the defense in 2012.  And he actually held his own with the bat also at the age of 19.   We should not just give up on this season without firing all our bullets.

But that costs 40 man roster slots and starts service clocks.

He doesn't think it's that important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

If Elias thinks sending kids to Bowie last year to get some playoff run exposure is very valuable then it would be very valuable to bring up a lot of our kids and let them feel what it is like trying to get a playoff spot.  And maybe just maybe they give us a boost.   Machado sure did wonders for the defense in 2012.  And he actually held his own with the bat also at the age of 19.   We should not just give up on this season without firing all our bullets.

I don’t think we have any ready to fire. Henderson’s K numbers that I saw at AAA are 1 out of 3 (83/247). I’d hate to damage him with a hasty call up. Stowers is 103/345 is nearly as bad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think we have any ready to fire. Henderson’s K numbers that I saw at AAA are 1 out of 3 (83/247). I’d hate to damage him with a hasty call up. Stowers is 103/345 is nearly as bad!

Yea, those guys the Braves called up from AA looks shattered beyond repair.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

Holly crap that is like having two Odors batting in the middle of your lineup.   

The Orioles have battled really well the second half of  the season considering two of their middle of the order bats are slumping plus the trades of Lopez & Mancini. 

At some point if the Orioles realistically expect to keep competing for the wildcard Hays/Mountcastle have to start hitting or start getting benched more often. 

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Odor has been showing up to the tune of a 584 OPS over the last 28 days.

Urias has been showing up to the tune of a 606 OPS over the last 28 days. (last 14 and 7 day splits are even worse)

The delta between those numbers and the expectations for those players is much lower than it is for Mountcastle and Hays. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gurgi said:

If Elias thinks sending kids to Bowie last year to get some playoff run exposure is very valuable then it would be very valuable to bring up a lot of our kids and let them feel what it is like trying to get a playoff spot.  And maybe just maybe they give us a boost.   Machado sure did wonders for the defense in 2012.  And he actually held his own with the bat also at the age of 19.   We should not just give up on this season without firing all our bullets.

From your mouth to God's ears.  Fingers crossed.  This offense needs a jolt.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a bit of a broader discussion about having correct expectations for the different parts of this team.  I don't think it's a coincidence that this year, the first season playing in a stadium with drastically altered dimensions and by some measures moved the park effects from 3rd to about 27th, the pitching has overperformed while the hitting has underperformed even on park-adjusted stats.  I don't think the park effects are fully baked in yet (they typically rely on 3 year rolling averages and we don't have 3 years yet.)

 

The long and the short of it here is that I don't think we should be quite as worried about our offensive ineptness as the stats might indicate, because i don't think park effects are correctly reflecting the change.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m sure Mountcastle’s batted ball data is great. 
 

The issue is, you know, batting the ball. 
 

Anyway, I don’t know if these two guys are THE problem but they certainly are a problem.  All hitters slump but their slumps seem to be extended. And their on base percentage suffers because they don’t walk. 
 

That’s the thing, if they walked a lot and didn’t swing at everything, their slumps probably aren’t as painful; they’d still be getting on base to a degree.  Right now they’re both pretty much automatic outs and nothing else. 

Edited by Moose Milligan
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yea, those guys the Braves called up from AA looks shattered beyond repair.

I live in Atlanta and I watch a ton of Braves games.  Definitely enjoying watching Harris and Grissom play.  If they were in the Os system, we wouldn't see them in the majors until 2026 due to some well crafted, combined excuse of service time, too many strike-outs, uniform doesn't seem to fit well around the crotch area, and just needs "more seasoning."

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

They are a problem but the problem is the bottom of the lineup can't pick them up when they are slumping

Wait. What?

Urias carried us through a stretch. Mateo has been a key part of the lineup over the past two months. Odor has had clutch moments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Hays is replaceable. Mountcastle is a bigger issue because we don't have an obvious successor in the pipeline. Both still have >100 OPS+ so they aren't terrible but it seems they are both disappearing at the same time when we need them to step up. 

Finding a first baseman/DH who can OPS 100-110 is one of the easier challenges for a GM.  If they wanted to.  Mountcastle isn't even arb eligible for another year, so carrying his 113 career OPS+ and letting him try to fix things isn't hurting much.

Hays needs to turn things around, obviously, but he's still on pace for a 2.5 win season or more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think we have any ready to fire. Henderson’s K numbers that I saw at AAA are 1 out of 3 (83/247). I’d hate to damage him with a hasty call up. Stowers is 103/345 is nearly as bad.

Where are you getting your numbers from?  Henderson has only been at Norfolk part of this year.  He has 32 bb to 66 k's at Norfolk.  His entire minor league career is 140/275 bb/k.  So slightly less than 1/2 ra

Stowers is 57/136 in Norfolk.  His totality of his minor career is 138/328.  So it's closer to what you posted but still quite a bit off.

I'm a little baffled as to where you're getting these numbers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Hallas said:

I think there is a bit of a broader discussion about having correct expectations for the different parts of this team.  I don't think it's a coincidence that this year, the first season playing in a stadium with drastically altered dimensions and by some measures moved the park effects from 3rd to about 27th, the pitching has overperformed while the hitting has underperformed even on park-adjusted stats.  I don't think the park effects are fully baked in yet (they typically rely on 3 year rolling averages and we don't have 3 years yet.)

 

The long and the short of it here is that I don't think we should be quite as worried about our offensive ineptness as the stats might indicate, because i don't think park effects are correctly reflecting the change.

The wall counts down on homers.  They could still be hitting a lot of doubles.  They could still have better averages, OBP, BB rates, etc…they could still be trying to do a better job of using all fields. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Not for someone who has money riding on him winning the award.
    • Well, now that we’ve established the hitting sucks, is it a good time to complain that this pitching is obviously over performing and will crash and burn any day now?
    • The bullpen has much more depth this year than last year but it just feels like you don’t know who will be the guy each night.  Last year it was get to the 8th and you knew it was Cano and Bautista and lights out.  This year it doesn’t seem to be set roles especially with Kimberly strugggles and out as clasper for now possibly.  I also think Hyde gets a lot of grief about how he handles the bullpen but I think he has been great at looking at the game situation and with who he wants facing what guys.  Cano might come in the 6th one night then close the next, same with Webb or even Coulumbe.  I know a lot of it is analytics but as a group they make a plan and seem to stick with it instead of some managers that have 7 inning guy an 8th inning guy and closer and don’t deviate much.  
    • On the replay you can see that Julio was lightly jogging after the ball-- either assuming the RF would get it, or assuming Hays wouldn't run. Good on Hays for taking advantage and turning it into a double. 
    • I think in general people are more negative in life not just in sports and they need to blame someone or something.  In previous years we had a scapegoat in Peter and John.  Elias didn’t go out and make a trade it was because he didn’t have the money to go get anyone or the owner didn’t want to spend.  Now for the most part people seem to think new ownership will give the ok to spend more so now if we don’t do it it is on Elias, Sig, and Hyde for not getting best out of the players.  We dint make a big trade last year and most people just went with well John is cheap we don’t do what they want now it will fall on Elias more then last year in peoples eyes imo.  
    • Mike Baumann.  An enigma wrapped in a conundrum.  Ride the wave!
    • The Yankees have been extremely healthy on offense as well.  If that somehow happens all year they will be right there with us but if I was a betting man I don’t think Judge, Stanton, Rizzo can stay healthy all year and they have very little depth behind those guys.  Besides Adley we have guys at every other position that can fill in if someone goes down.  There might be a drop some but I don’t think it would be catastrophic like losing Judge or Soto.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...