Jump to content

Wednesday, September 14: Orioles complete 2 game series in Washington


SteveA

Recommended Posts

So the Nats started the bullpen car last year at some point.   This is about the 10th game I've been to since then and that is the FIRST TIME I have ever seen a reliever take the cart in.   It always stops by the bullpen, offers the reliever a ride, he refuses, and it circles the warning track so everyone can read the sponsor name.

But Baker actually rode in it!  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

Three problems with that:

  1.  We don't play Tampa 6 times like we do Toronto so we need a lot of help from other teams.
  2.  We went 9-10 against them so they have the tiebreak (vs Toronto we have the tiebreak).   So being 4 back of Tampa is really like being 5 back.  Sucks that they took away tiebreak playoff games.
  3. Having that 3 game series at the end of the season with Toronto meant that all we had to do is get within 3 games by October 2 and we'd at least have a fighting chance, basically a 1982 style situation.   If we are 3 back of Tampa with 3 left, sure we are still in it mathematically but not only would we need a sweep but we would need [whoever] to sweep Tampa too which would be a complete pipe dream.

So the Jays taking 3 of 4 is actually quite bad for us, hurts our chances bigtime.

If we had beaten Tampa ONE more time, we would be one game better, they would be one game worse, and we would have the tiebreaker two so instead of what is essentially a 5 game deficit right now (4 with them having the tiebreak), it would be just 2.   Someone go back over our 10 losses to Tampa and find The One That Got Away.

I know all those things. I was merely going by who we re now going to be closer to. It’s tough regardless... but just keep winning and playing well and let the cards lie where they will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

This seems like a good time to make my thoughts on these Nationals hats. They are in a word, AWful. They look like a 1980's minor league hat.

I've said they look like something you'd get on the mall in DC for about ten bucks. Has a made in Bangladesh tag in it. 

Only think missing is mouse ears or a raccoon tail down the back. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

So the Nats started the bullpen car last year at some point.   This is about the 10th game I've been to since then and that is the FIRST TIME I have ever seen a reliever take the cart in.   It always stops by the bullpen, offers the reliever a ride, he refuses, and it circles the warning track so everyone can read the sponsor name.

But Baker actually rode in it!  

Doolittle always took it I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

I know all those things. I was merely going by who we re now going to be closer to. It’s tough regardless... but just keep winning and playing well and let the cards lie where they will. 

Yeah. Just have to keep winning. 
 

Kevin Brown said it was good news the Jays won….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

This seems like a good time to make my thoughts on these Nationals hats. They are in a word, AWful. They look like a 1980's minor league hat.

Somehow they found a way to make the Walgreens logo caps look better. The new Nationals hats look like they came from a 1980's or early 90's movie about a fictional baseball team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PHRESH said:

Any reliever ever DRIVE it in? 

Not that I’m aware of. It’s a wonder Stanhouse never did it. 
 

I’m too young to remember 79 but I’ve seen the replay of some of the games and the cart was still used then. I know they had it for the WS teams 69-71.  Not sure what was first year it started. I think most teams ended it in early 80’s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Three problems with that:

  1.  We don't play Tampa 6 times like we do Toronto so we need a lot of help from other teams.
  2.  We went 9-10 against them so they have the tiebreak (vs Toronto we have the tiebreak).   So being 4 back of Tampa is really like being 5 back.  Sucks that they took away tiebreak playoff games.
  3. Having that 3 game series at the end of the season with Toronto meant that all we had to do is get within 3 games by October 2 and we'd at least have a fighting chance, basically a 1982 style situation.   If we are 3 back of Tampa with 3 left, sure we are still in it mathematically but not only would we need a sweep but we would need [whoever] to sweep Tampa too which would be a complete pipe dream.

So the Jays taking 3 of 4 is actually quite bad for us, hurts our chances bigtime.

If we had beaten Tampa ONE more time, we would be one game better, they would be one game worse, and we would have the tiebreaker two so instead of what is essentially a 5 game deficit right now (4 with them having the tiebreak), it would be just 2.   Someone go back over our 10 losses to Tampa and find The One That Got Away.

I would nominate the July 27 game as The One That Got Away.

The Orioles came from behind to tie the game on a ninth-inning homer by Mateo.  The Orioles had been doing very well in extra-inning games, and with All-Star Jorge Lopez coming in to pitch the top of the tenth, I had to like their chances of winning this one.

But Yandy Diaz hit a little dribbler down the third-base line for an infield single and Lopez walked Brandon Lowe.  That brought up Arozarena with no place to put him, and he smacked a two-run double.

Lopez got out of the inning without allowing any more runs, but Fairbanks put the O's down 1-2-3 and the Rays won, 6-4.

Lopez would pitch only one more game in an Oriole uniform.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Not that I’m aware of. It’s a wonder Stanhouse never did it. 
 

I’m too young to remember 79 but I’ve seen the replay of some of the games and the cart was still used then. I know they had it for the WS teams 69-71.  Not sure what was first year it started. I think most teams ended it in early 80’s. 

Back in the ‘60s and ‘70s the Dodgers used one for relievers every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Beating the Walgreens Nationals is always a plus. 

BcxgprcCAAAkdce?format=jpg&name=small

What people are missing in this comparison is that the Nationals' logo is simply continuing the one used by the Washington Senators 1963-71:

https://www.sportslogos.net/logos/list_by_team/79/washington_senators/

So in a sense it's not the Nationals who unthinkingly resemble Walgreens, but the other way around: https://1000logos.net/walgreens-logo/

Wegman's also had a "flying W" and sued Walgreens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Adley is having a down year. I believe he will bounce back.
    • I admire those of you who have such confidence in this offense. It’s been absolutely terrible for months, other than the last week of the season. It was beyond terrible yesterday- yes Ragans was good but the approach was awful by every hitter. I’ll be thrilled for them to prove me overly pessimistic, but I have zero faith in these bats.  This is at least partially a defense mechanism. I am not ready for the baseball season to be over, and another terribly quick exit from the postseason would just be so dreadful. I don’t need them to win the WS. But winning one GD game would be nice. Not looking forward to six months without baseball. 
    • You don’t have to twist yourself into a pretzel to defend Hyde. If Santander’s defense costs us, it means we got to extra innings and pinch running for OHearn was the right call. Also, are you really trying to say that OHearn is so valuable a defender at 1B that we couldn’t stand to lose that glove in extras? I doubt he’s even better than Santander. 
    • Here's what people thought a couple weeks ago.   
    • Wieters' bWAR was 13.3 through his first 4 seasons (2009 - 2012).  It ended at 18.3 after his last season in 2020, so he was basically ineffective for the last 8 years of his career. Adley's bWAR is 13.1 through his first 3 seasons. So it isn't like Wieters didn't have a strong start to his career just like Adley did.  I think the concern that folks have is that the rest of Adley's career will play out like the rest of Wieters' career.  It seemed very unlikely halfway through this year, but this has been one hell of a drop-off.   And after Wieters never lived up to expectations, it is definitely a fear that we may be reliving this again.  Let's hope this second half was just an aberration.   
    • Adley has been in a horrible almost 4 month slump. Before that, he was the WAY BETTER offensive player. But I pose this question: What does it matter if Rutschman turns out to be worse than Wieters? Matt Wieters was drafted almost TWENTY YEARS AGO. No one in this org had anything to do with him being on our roster. HEck none of our current front office was even here for his entire Orioles' career.
    • I do feel like Adley is out of shape or at least has gotten more out of shape than usual. That’s part of the reason I think he’s hurt…not working out as much. If he is healthy and the slump is this bad, I’m ok questioning whether or not the new GF(ie the distraction) is part of it. Is he putting everything into the game that he should?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...