Jump to content

Tate to begin year on IL plus other notes


eddie83

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

A lot can happen.  I think Akin goes for Givens.  Then it sounds like Tate with will be 7-10 days behind that.  We could send down Baumann just to keep everyone.  However, I think Perez needs to show something over the next 2-3 weeks or he's in trouble.  

What worries me is that with Givens and Tate back, we won't have optionable pieces.  

Buatista - not going anywhere - three optons

Cano - Same - two options

Baker - two options

Tate - two options

Givens - no options

Columbe - no options

Akin - one option

Perez - no options

Baumann - one option

Voth - no options

 

Depending on how things go with Tate, maybe since he's got two options, that he's not a given to come back right away.  

Tate does provide flexibility since they can store him in Norfolk until they're 100% sure he's ready.

I don't see any scenario where they dump both Akin and Perez and leave Danny Coulombe as the only left-handed pitcher on the entire roster.

More likely that they cut back down to two catchers and sit pitcher-heavy for a little while, especially with the way the pen has been getting used and abused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FlipTheBird said:

Tate does provide flexibility since they can store him in Norfolk until they're 100% sure he's ready.

I don't see any scenario where they dump both Akin and Perez and leave Danny Coulombe as the only left-handed pitcher on the entire roster.

More likely that they cut back down to two catchers and sit pitcher-heavy for a little while, especially with the way the pen has been getting used and abused.

There's an MLB limit for how many pitchers a 26 man roster can have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • But again, nothing you say here changes anything. This team is going to be built from within. They are not going to try to build any other way…and they are right about that. This doesn’t mean they don’t need to spend but again, those guys will supplement the roster. And don’t think they won’t talk about how they added guys at the deadline for 2025. That they are “like free agent signings”.
    • It was the holder, not the kicker.  Jackson may not be perfect, but he's far from the problem this year. He's got a fumbling issue that may at some point cost this team a game or two, but there is no doubt he's playing some good football right now.
    • Yeah I'm surprised that Cleveland has been this bad. They were good last season. 
    • Gunnar also signed a one year contract.
    • The when is really two questions.  One is when do the O's stop being handicapped by the risk-averse mindset that's governed their behavior since 2018, and the second is when does a 74 year-old billionaire tire of being told he has to wait a little longer because Jackson Holliday needs to further refine his new toe-tap?  Oh, and we also need to nail down a position for Coby Mayo, and so on.  No question?  I think the questions are numerous and many of them pretty important, and because they're so important, I think we'll start seeing a change in approach beginning this offseason.  I certainly hope so. Nothing I've said disputes the need for internal development or diminishes the role our current core of young players - some of whom haven't exactly made a seamless transition - will need to play for sustained success.  Nor is it a call for stupid FA spending.  It very much is an argument that time needs to be thought of differently now that two very successful regular seasons are behind the O's and the huge impediment of Angelos ownership is no longer a factor.
    • If he wants to join Hyde’s staff in some capacity, I’d be fine with that. Or are you actually talking about him being on the team as a player?
    • So why would you have sought payment if you were owner as you previously stated?  Since you are not known for being litigious and all? Also as I am sure you’re already aware the media exclusivity rights in Vegas are already shared by 6 major league teams. Which clearly was not the situation in DC as the territory was expressly the territory of the Baltimore Orioles.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...