Jump to content

2023 Ongoing Lineup Thread


Ripken

Recommended Posts

Just now, DirtyBird said:

You really think there is a reason for Vavra to be on the team if Cowser is promoted?

He may have a bench role to be a left handed pinch hitter? O'hearn can go and he can stay as the last bench guy. But I sure would prefer playing the better player in Cowser if we are serious about trying to win.

Other than plate discipline/swing decisions, what does Varva do well? And from my untrained eye, he sure looks overmatched against power stuff up in the zone. 

Varva and Frazier are redundant players. And since Frazier is better and we are paying him 8 million, I say keep him and get a real outfielder to play righties instead of Varva... Oh wait we have some options already at AAA like Cowser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow we face a LHP. I'm betting that James McCann is in the lineup as Catcher. And with the way the guys are currently hitting, I'd be considering putting Santander back in the #3 spot just because he's taking a better approach at the plate and being more selective with what he swings at, where as Mountcastle isn't really making the pitcher pitch inside the strike zone. (Mounty seems to be swinging at too many balls outside the zone, and smart pitchers know they can get him out without having to throw anything he can really hit.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Tomorrow we face a LHP. I'm betting that James McCann is in the lineup as Catcher. And with the way the guys are currently hitting, I'd be considering putting Santander back in the #3 spot just because he's taking a better approach at the plate and being more selective with what he swings at, where as Mountcastle isn't really making the pitcher pitch inside the strike zone. (Mounty seems to be swinging at too many balls outside the zone, and smart pitchers know they can get him out without having to throw anything he can really hit.)

I was there tonight and Mounty drilled 2 line drives to RF but right at-ems. He had a 7 pitch AB to single in the 9th, advanced to 3rd on Santander's single, and broke for home to score the winning run. Before his single to advance Mounty, Santander had hit fly balls to all 3 fields. Neither is hitting for average but Mounty's OPS is almost 100 points higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

Varva and Frazier are redundant players. And since Frazier is better and we are paying him 8 million, I say keep him and get a real outfielder to play righties instead of Varva... Oh wait we have some options already at AAA like Cowser.

Vavra and Frazier both looked overmatched tonight, and Vavra doesn't look very fleet of foot. He handled a few pretty routine chances but didn't look comfortable in RF to me. The outfielder in AAA who hits lefties and is on the 40 man isn't named Cowser, it's Stowers. If anyone thinks Vavra is the answer, they are asking the wrong question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Vavra and Frazier both looked overmatched tonight, and Vavra doesn't look very fleet of foot. He handled a few pretty routine chances but didn't look comfortable in RF to me. The outfielder in AAA who hits lefties and is on the 40 man isn't named Cowser, it's Stowers. If anyone thinks Vavra is the answer, they are asking the wrong question.

I don’t understand why they prefer Varva over Stowers. 
 

But having said that, Cowser is the much better prospect than Stowers. And he will give you better corner outfield defense and better speed. The issue for both are the strikeouts.

But if they brought up Stowers first to replace Varva that would be fine with me. Varva is such a low ceiling player, who IMO only possesses 1 tool - plate discipline/swing decisions. But against power pitchers who can challenge him up in the zone, he’s pretty much useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

I don’t understand why they prefer Varva over Stowers. 

It seems pretty obvious to me that the biggest factor is that we highly value plate discipline now. My guess is that we are keeping Vavra up because he has the best plate discipline, a little more versatility, and we want to see if he can stick. Even if he ends up being somewhat of a hole in the lineup, he should at least have pretty good at bats, so that’ll run up the pitch count and wear down pitchers so our better hitters can take advantage. I definitely don’t mind having Vavra in the 9  hole for a little while just to see how he does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vavra is batting .190, OPS .482 and just had a 2 pitch AB last night resulting in a DP. When Det went to a leftie they subbed McKenna for him. Vavra is not a good defensive 2B, had some good results at 3B in ST, but has no business in RF at all except in emergency. So much for versatility. He is redundant with Urias who is a better hitter and the reigning GG at 3B who is basically a Util IF because of Gunnar. We are playing a man short every day Vavra is on the roster. Imagine an actual RF that can hit lefties in that spot.

Edited by AnythingO's
typo
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Vavra is batting .190, OPS .482 and just had a 2 pitch AB last night resulting in a DP. When Det went to a leftie they subbed McKenna for him. Vavra is not a good defensive 2B, had some good results at 3B in ST, but has no business in RF at all except in emergency. So much for versatility. He is redundant with Urias who is a better hitter and the reigning GG at 3B who is basically a Util IF because of Gunnar. We are playing a man short every day Vavra is on the roster. Imagine an actual RF that can hit lefties in that spot.

It's hard to see why they've kept Vavra in the majors if all he's going to do is play RF here and there. Stowers serves the same purpose and as everyone keeps pointing out, he's likely got the better bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

It's hard to see why they've kept Vavra in the majors if all he's going to do is play RF here and there. Stowers serves the same purpose and as everyone keeps pointing out, he's likely got the better bat.

I think the feeling was that Vavra was the better pure hitter and would have better AB's than Stowers, especially with sporadic playing time.   Vavra has not performed so I think his spot might be in jeopardy but I doubt it's Stowers who takes his place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think the feeling was that Vavra was the better pure hitter and would have better AB's than Stowers, especially with sporadic playing time.   Vavra has not performed so I think his spot might be in jeopardy but I doubt it's Stowers who takes his place.

Westburg has been playing OF more often. There’s obviously more of a need for a RH bat in that role. I’m assuming we see him once he heats up a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think the feeling was that Vavra was the better pure hitter and would have better AB's than Stowers, especially with sporadic playing time.   Vavra has not performed so I think his spot might be in jeopardy but I doubt it's Stowers who takes his place.

I agree and I think that was the thinking, but now there is a role to be had for Stowers to play 3 times a week versus RHP. That’s not a bad way to crack into the bigs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I agree and I think that was the thinking, but now there is a role to be had for Stowers to play 3 times a week versus RHP. That’s not a bad way to crack into the bigs. 

I think O'Hearn will pick up any AB's that Vavra would have had.    I don't think you're going to see Stowers right away but honestly I don't know who would replace Vavra.   Maybe Ortiz.   Maybe Westburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think O'Hearn will pick up any AB's that Vavra would have had.    I don't think you're going to see Stowers right away but honestly I don't know who would replace Vavra.   Maybe Ortiz.   Maybe Westburg.

With this FO, you never know but there's already a logjam at MIF. It would need to be someone who can play OF.

I don't want anyone to get hurt, but Mateo going on the DL had the potential to get some things moving maybe. Ortiz comes up, plays great, forcing them to make some decisions. Maybe a trade gets made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...