Jump to content

Predict the 26


seak05

Recommended Posts

With just over a week until Opening Day, who makes the final MLB roster? 

Safe = 18:

SP: Gibson, Ivin, Bradish, Kremer

RP: Bautista, Baker, Perez, Akin

IF: Mateo, Mountcastle, Urias, Henderson, Frazier, Rutschmann, McCann

OF: Santander, Mullins, Hays

Prediction:

SP: Rodriguez

RP: Wells, Voth (especially with Givens injured, I think these two are definitely on the roster), Bauman, Politi

IF: Vavra

OF: McKenna, Stowers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Givens' injury a known thing? I thought the quote was that his knee was sore but hoping to go?

I don't think Baumann makes it. Tough choice between Voth and Politi but I'd go with the guy we'd lose and option the other. Krehbiel could make it but I'd also rather option him and keep Politi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Is Givens' injury a known thing? I thought the quote was that his knee was sore but hoping to go?

I don't think Baumann makes it. Tough choice between Voth and Politi but I'd go with the guy we'd lose and option the other. Krehbiel could make it but I'd also rather option him and keep Politi.

Neither  Voth nor Politi can be optioned.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bench: Urias/Mateo, McCann, McKenna, Cordero (but could definitely be Vavra over Cordero)

Bullpen: Bautista, Baker, Perez, Akin, Voth, Politi, Khrebiel, Hall (until stretched out to SP innings; having him on OD roster keeps him eligible for ROY draft comp) 

Givens on the IL, if he is healthy then Khrebiel is optioned. 

Wells and Watkins remained stretched out as SP depth at AAA. Wells get an extra year of service time back by staying down a couple weeks; he’ll be back on the MLB roster as a SP or RP in some capacity depending on need and what they think of his future chances as a SP. 

Baumann probably the next man up for the pen, but he could still use more time getting used to the short RP role and I think they defer to Khrebiel initially based on his role last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C : Rutschman and McCann (obviously)

INF: Mountcastle, Frazier, Urias, Mateo, Henderson

OF: Stowers, Santander, Mullins, Hays, McKenna

UTL: Terrin Vavra

SP: Gibson, Bradish, Irvin, Kremer, G-Rod

RP: Bautista, Perez, Givens, Akin, Baker, Voth, Politi, Wells

If Givens is on the IL, then it's probably Khrebiel, but maybe Baumann. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't really matter.  If MLB had some silly rule about being only able to use the 26 guys you have on Opening Day for the entire season then this becomes a big topic.  But they start roster shuffling and sending guys up and down after the first or second series.  

 

1 hour ago, jamalshw said:

C : Rutschman and McCann (obviously)

INF: Mountcastle, Frazier, Urias, Mateo, Henderson

OF: Stowers, Santander, Mullins, Hays, McKenna

UTL: Terrin Vavra

SP: Gibson, Bradish, Irvin, Kremer, G-Rod

RP: Bautista, Perez, Givens, Akin, Baker, Voth, Politi, Wells

If Givens is on the IL, then it's probably Khrebiel, but maybe Baumann. 

That said, this is probably as good of a guess as anyone can make.

I will say that this is the first time in a long time where I expect the majority of the OD guys to be on the roster at Game 162.  Seems like the last few years there's been the chance that you could have a completely different Game 162 roster than you did on Opening Day because most everyone was expendable.

So that's a nice change.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It doesn't really matter.  If MLB had some silly rule about being only able to use the 26 guys you have on Opening Day for the entire season then this becomes a big topic.  But they start roster shuffling and sending guys up and down after the first or second series.  

 

That said, this is probably as good of a guess as anyone can make.

I will say that this is the first time in a long time where I expect the majority of the OD guys to be on the roster at Game 162.  Seems like the last few years there's been the chance that you could have a completely different Game 162 roster than you did on Opening Day because most everyone was expendable.

So that's a nice change.

This was in the Banner:

Last year, Kelvin Gutiérrez started at third base on opening day; he only played 12 games for the Orioles before he was optioned and later released.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unpopular take but I bet Rodriguez starts off at AAA.  Both Watkins and Voth are set up to take his place in the rotation. This would allow Rodriguez to have shortened starts for a bit while not taxing the Baltimore bullpen. He hasn’t exactly been dominant either. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oriole said:

Unpopular take but I bet Rodriguez starts off at AAA.  Both Watkins and Voth are set up to take his place in the rotation. This would allow Rodriguez to have shortened starts for a bit while not taxing the Baltimore bullpen. He hasn’t exactly been dominant either. 
 

 

You spelled attempt to game his service time wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. The opening day roster doesn’t mean anything.   They start the shuttle between Norfolk/Bowie and Baltimore after the first or second series of the season, whoever starts on the roster on opening day doesn’t matter. 
 

I will say I don’t think Holliday makes it, but whatever. He’ll be up soon enough. Most everyone that’s received long looks in ST will make an appearance in Baltimore at some point or another. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...