Jump to content

Appears Grayson pitched his way to AAA to start the year


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

I’ll be slightly contrarian and say I wasn’t expecting much more than 4 IP/75 pitches this outing.  He was in danger of not reaching 4 IP for the fourth consecutive attempt, when he’d thrown 46 pitches after two innings, including 25 in the second (which was longer than it needed to be due to O’Hearn’s error).  So, the fact that he got through the 3rd and 4th in only 29 pitches was a good sign.  Unlike his other starts where he started strong and faded in the 3rd/4th, here Grayson fought through a slow start and held it together.   

That said, 4 walks in 4 innings is not Grayson-like, and from reading reports of those who were able to watch (I couldn’t get the feed to load), he threw a lot of pitches that were nowhere near the strike zone.  His overall 64% strike rate wasn’t bad, but it sounds like he had to groove them a bit, and couldn’t throw those pitches that start out as strikes and dive out of the zone late.  He’s got to have those back in his repertoire before he gets called up.  

Would love some more observations from those who were able to watch.  

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that people have PTSD when it’s comes to Os prospects, especially pitchers but Grayson will be fine. He’s arguably the most talented pitching prospect we have had in 30 years. 

They will get it figured out. 

If they could figure out Kremer and Bradish, they can figure out Rodriguez.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Would love some more observations from those who were able to watch.  

More than anything, it looked like he couldn't throw his breaking pitches for strikes.  That allowed hitters to sit on the fastball, which looked fine, but it's gonna get hit when guys are looking for it.  I didn't think the HR he allowed was on a fastball but someone can correct me.  Last two innings were a bit better and it was really wet.  I'm not totally discouraged, and he sure looks healthy, but I'll stop holding my breath when he finally has a good 6 inning performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’ll be slightly contrarian and say I wasn’t expecting much more than 4 IP/75 pitches this outing.  He was in danger of not reaching 4 IP for the fourth consecutive attempt, when he’d thrown 46 pitches after two innings, including 25 in the second (which was longer than it needed to be due to O’Hearn’s error).  So, the fact that he got through the 3rd and 4th in only 29 pitches was a good sign.  Unlike his other starts where he started strong and faded in the 3rd/4th, here Grayson fought through a slow start and held it together.   

That said, 4 walks in 4 innings is not Grayson-like, and from reading reports of those who were able to watch (I couldn’t get the feed to load), he threw a lot of pitches that were nowhere near the strike zone.  His overall 64% strike rate wasn’t bad, but it sounds like he had to groove them a bit, and couldn’t throw those pitches that start out as strikes and dive out of the zone late.  He’s got to have those back in his repertoire before he gets called up.  

Would love some more observations from those who were able to watch.  

 

It was just a start where nothing went right.  A couple slow hit seeing eye singles.  A couple double plays that should have been turned that weren’t.  He was throwing hard, I saw a lot of 97s.  Everything was missing glove side, which tells me something is off that shouldn’t be too difficult to fix, it’s not like he was all over the place.  He got a lot of strike calls that I don’t think he would have gotten in MLB, so to me 64%Strikes thrown is a little generous.  The off speed wasn’t crisp but that could easily be due to the weather.  Looked like a guy that didn’t want to be pitching in AAA on a rain day.  Imagine he makes adjustments and has a better outing next time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ripken said:

More than anything, it looked like he couldn't throw his breaking pitches for strikes.  That allowed hitters to sit on the fastball, which looked fine, but it's gonna get hit when guys are looking for it.  I didn't think the HR he allowed was on a fastball but someone can correct me.  Last two innings were a bit better and it was really wet.  I'm not totally discouraged, and he sure looks healthy, but I'll stop holding my breath when he finally has a good 6 inning performance.

The secondaries have been an issue since coming back from his injury. 

That is what needs to get figured out.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ripken said:

More than anything, it looked like he couldn't throw his breaking pitches for strikes.  That allowed hitters to sit on the fastball, which looked fine, but it's gonna get hit when guys are looking for it.  I didn't think the HR he allowed was on a fastball but someone can correct me.  Last two innings were a bit better and it was really wet.  I'm not totally discouraged, and he sure looks healthy, but I'll stop holding my breath when he finally has a good 6 inning performance.

Home run was a 97 mph fastball right down the middle. 
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be way off here because the clock was in place last year in aaa but I think pitch clock was negatively affecting him. He looked frustrated/rushed. I think if he was able to step off the mound take some deep breathes to regain his composure it would of helped. The clock is the new norm and he and everyone will have to adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Not gonna panic about one start… but if you derive anything from spring training you could argue it’s 3-4 starts.

Not gonna panic about 3-4 starts, either.

And the handful of iffy starts at the end of last season post injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...