Jump to content

How many games will the O’s win in 2023?


Frobby

How many games will the Orioles win in 2023?  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. How many games will the O’s win in 2023?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/30/23 at 17:00

Recommended Posts

This is where I get pessimistic.   I also say right around 80 so I went with 79-82.    I'm concerned about the bullpen.   The starting pitching should be about average but what really made the team last year was the bullpen.   Bautista should be great and Perez looks like he's ready to continue what he did last year.   The rest?   I have my doubts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Pickles said:

These are very narrow ranges.  I went with 83-86, because I believe that is the most likely  outcome.  However, the odds strongly favor the win total not falling in that range.

Grayson, DL Hall and Means are going to be key contributors if the Orioles end up on the higher end of their projected win total this year. If Grayson and Means can be effective starters this year and pitch up to their potential the O's stand a good chance of getting into the postseason.

Means likely won't be all the way back until 2024, but for this year if he can be effective and take away innings that might otherwise go to less effective pitchers is good enough. Additionally if the Orioles are in the wildcard race is there any chance Elias will be able to trade for a veteran starting pitcher that will push the team into the playoffs.

I know Elias has stated the Orioles will add payroll when they're ready to win, but it's just talk until it happens. I just question ownership's appetite to add payroll even when it's the difference between making the playoffs or staying home after game 162.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

 

I know Elias has stated the Orioles will add payroll when they're ready to win,

The Orioles will not be adding much to payroll outside of some arbitration cases. This was the year and they didn’t do it. That signals that it will never happen until the team is sold. Elias was lied to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

83-86.

Balanced schedule and less games against the AL East should wipe out any regression in performances from certain players.

 

That was my vote too and with similar rationale. The part of my heart that the O's break most seasons thinks it will be more like 78 wins, but I think overall there is more talent on the team this year than at the start of last year and more and better depth in the minors for a lot of positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

That was my vote too and with similar rationale. The part of my heart that the O's break most seasons thinks it will be more like 78 wins, but I think overall there is more talent on the team this year than at the start of last year and more and better depth in the minors for a lot of positions. 

I agree that there's more talent here than in previous seasons.  

IMO, this season will be as successful as the rotation takes us.  If Gibson can match what Lyles did last year and if Kremer and Bradish can provide what they did towards the end of last year, I like our chances.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted to pick 87-90, but went with 83-86. 

I'll be surprised if we fall majorly short of last year, because we have so many intriguing depth options in the upper minors to plug holes when necessary. But I'm also not sure this team has enough elite talent to be a top contender yet.

I expect the Yankees, Jays, and Astros to be the top teams in the AL, with the O's are in the mix with about 7 other teams for the remaining playoff spots. I think they'll be in the race til the end but are more likely than not to fall a few games short. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...