Jump to content

We really are in a monster of a division


dystopia

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

I think Toronto is a bigger threat than the Yankees...and Tampa will cool off...dont sleep on the Jays...

Franchy has veen demoted.

I heard on the radio someone said the Yankees 7,8 and 9 hitters are the least productive in the Americsn League. I guess it is true but I look at some other teams like the Tigers and think maybe not  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's important that we kick the **** out of KC because after that we have the Braves, Rays and then the Pirates.  After a 4 game set against the Angels, we've got the Jays again and then the Yankees, Rangers and the Guardians.  It's not about to get easier.

The Rays schedule is going to get tough for them, too.  They have the Pirates this week, then the Yankees, us, the Yankees again, the Mets, the Brewers, the Jays, the Dodgers, the Cubs (not completely awful this year) and then the Red Sox.

I think the May schedule is going to tell us a lot about these two teams.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Plus it’s the Royals and I’ll never forgive them for the 2014 ALCS. I want to Orioles to sweep the Royals every time they play no matter the circumstances. 

Most frustrating series of baseball I have ever watched. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, interloper said:

Most frustrating series of baseball I have ever watched. 

Even before that series started in 2014, I was nervous. I did not like that match up and  would have preferred the Angels. The Royals had a killer bullpen, very good team speed running the bases and a stellar defense. Just the type of team built for the grind of postseason baseball.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Even before that series started in 2014, I was nervous. I did not like that match up and  would have preferred the Angels. The Royals had a killer bullpen, very good team speed running the bases and a stellar defense. Just the type of team built for the grind of postseason baseball.

 

And then they just dinked and doinked us every game it seemed like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Are you old enough to have watched the 1969 World Series?

No sir! Born in '83, so the Buck years were really my first memorable playoff years. I was hit or miss with fandom as a kid in the 90s, but really started to lock in during the early 2000s Dark Years. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Plus it’s the Royals and I’ll never forgive them for the 2014 ALCS. I want to Orioles to sweep the Royals every time they play no matter the circumstances. 

There's the angle.     The YES Network guy who has a book coming out on the 25th anniversary of the '98 Yankees had an anecdote how after the slow 1-4 start Torre was mad and called a meeting.   David Cone spoke of the need to find a way to hate your opponent every night.

Adley needs to look at Jordan Lyles Thursday like some of us would look at Eric Hosmer.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's important that we kick the **** out of KC because after that we have the Braves, Rays and then the Pirates.  After a 4 game set against the Angels, we've got the Jays again and then the Yankees, Rangers and the Guardians.  It's not about to get easier.

The Rays schedule is going to get tough for them, too.  They have the Pirates this week, then the Yankees, us, the Yankees again, the Mets, the Brewers, the Jays, the Dodgers, the Cubs (not completely awful this year) and then the Red Sox.

I think the May schedule is going to tell us a lot about these two teams.  

Would you take .500 for May? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Going Underground said:

Franchy has veen demoted.

I heard on the radio someone said the Yankees 7,8 and 9 hitters are the least productive in the Americsn League. I guess it is true but I look at some other teams like the Tigers and think maybe not  

 

Franchy now veen promoted. Or taking the place of the Judge. Franchy is a tough man to kept down or walk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...