Jump to content

MASN loses in NY Court of Appeals


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I’m not at all surprised by this result.   The rights fees for 2012-16 are now settled per the decision of the RSDC, affirmed by the court.  There are collateral issues about set-offs for distribution of MASN profits, and any interest due, that now have to be resolved through a AAA arbitration if the parties don’t agree.   These are simple issues that normal parties would resolve quickly without the need for further arbitration, but I won’t be shocked if MASN and the Orioles drag this out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

Thanks for staying on top of this Frobby. I have a strange question. Do you know under the terms of the MASN deal who actually owns the TV rights to the Nats. For instance, could MASN sell or outsource the broadcast rights to another RSN? 

I have a copy of the MASN contract and can check that.  Don’t have time right now, but I will get back to you on that.  

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so does this now mean the rights fees are a settled issue? If so, what reason would the Orioles have to further delay payment, unless seeking appeal in a higher court? Also, I'm slightly confused about the NY court system, the NY court of appeals is the highest court in the state so no further appeals in NY?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I’m not at all surprised by this result.   The rights fees for 2012-16 are now settled per the decision of the RSDC, affirmed by the court.  There are collateral issues about set-offs for distribution of MASN profits, and any interest due, that now have to be resolved through a AAA arbitration if the parties don’t agree.   These are simple issues that normal parties would resolve quickly without the need for further arbitration, but I won’t be shocked if MASN and the Orioles drag this out.  

So the Washington Post who said a ruling was coming around this week was sort of right. So now the Orioles can move since Baltimore City filed a brief to the court saying if you rule against the Orioles, they would not be sustainable in Baltimore. 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Going Underground said:

So the Washington Post who said a ruling was coming around this week was sort of right.

I believe they said last week that a ruling could come as early as the end of last week.   Close enough!  I wonder how they knew that.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Going Underground said:

From the Sun:

The Orioles could, in theory, appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, but it’s unlikely the court would accept the case. The decision Tuesday could pave the way for the Nationals to receive roughly $100 million that the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network placed in escrow in 2019.

I really hope this is the beginning of the end of this saga. I can't help but feel that there was bad faith acting on all sides of this thing and it just needs to end. And I really don't care at what expense to the Orioles and MASN at this point. Thanks for the reply

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

The Orioles could, in theory, appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, but it’s unlikely the court would accept the case. The decision Tuesday could pave the way for the Nationals to receive roughly $100 million that the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network placed in escrow in 2019.

Start sending box seats to the justices, baby!  Give 'em Rutschman jerseys!  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Banner:

 

MASN and the Orioles have argued in court documents that the award could threaten the sustainability of the network as well as the competitiveness, economic viability and ability of the team to remain in Baltimore.

 

Nashville, Nashville here we come.Right back where my wife's music career started from.

Seriously, I won der if the Orioles would give more consideration to the Ted Leonsis offer to buy MASN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Like I said the other day, it would be nice to hear from some scouts, the org or whoever about all the walks, lack of power, lack of BA, etc…is he tweaking things? Is the elbow bothering him to where he can’t drive the ball? Is he getting nothing to hit?     I’m surprised someone from the Banner hasn’t gotten into this because it’s obviously a big story and one that should be reported on.  
    • One thing to note is that Jackson made swing tweaks his first three weeks back in Norfolk but then abandoned them because they “didn’t feel great”. From this Baltimore Banner article:  “Earlier, as he fiddled, Holliday felt he was “surviving” and “didn’t feel great” about where his swing was, even though he produced at the Triple-A level upon his return. That has since changed. Over the last two weeks, particularly, Holliday’s return to the mechanics he’s more familiar with has helped him get back on track.” His contact rate really dropped off when he reverted back to his familiar mechanics. I worry that he gave up on the changes too soon. First three weeks back vs. after (includes tracked pitches and non-bunts)   PAs    K%           wOBA  xwOBA whiff % 4/27-5/18 91 19.8% .366 .349 21.6% 5/19-7/2 118 28.8% .392 .337 32.1%     PAs    EV      hard hit % barrel/PA 4/27-5/18 91 89.5 44.4% 4.4% 5/19-7/2 118 89.8 44.6% 4.2%
    • Sure. And his ligaments would have likely snapped, and he'd have put that college degree to good use instead of being a ballplayer. Or he would have thrown at 90% like most everyone else and topped out with Cedar Rapids in the Three-I League.
    • Let's say you allow the sticky stuff. The guys whose sweeper breaks 10" might now see it break 12". You think they're going to grip the ball more loosely, throw with a little less effort, get hurt less, and be content with a 10" sweeper?  No! They're going to grip the hell out of the ball and use the sticky stuff and try to get a 15" sweeper. And they'll keep getting hurt just as much. It couldn't be more clear that almost every pitcher and every coach and every team chooses the high-risk, high-reward path. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.
    • I guarantee you that if Christy could only get guys out by using his best stuff he would have.  
    • I'm going to guess that in the olden days there was a weeding out that happened before most kids played an organized baseball game. Many, many kids played baseball all day long in the summer, and many, many of them tore up their elbow or shoulder at 11 or 13 or whatever and never pitched on a high school or other team. And nobody was Drivelining anyone. Part of the philosophy of pitching was you don't throw as hard as you possibly can because it hurts and you'll ruin your arm. A few people got away with throwing near max effort, but most couldn't. And there was a very stong stigma to coming out of a game, so pitchers knew they'd be shamed and mocked if they threw until it really hurt and had to come out. In the 1910's Christy Mathewson (or a ghostwriter) wrote Pitching in a Pinch, where he explicitly said that using your best stuff except when you really needed to was stupid.  Smoltz is a guy who idiotically venerates the past, making the era where he came up into some kind of golden nirvana. But, he is right that the driving factor in injuries today is that everyone throws at 110% of rated capacity all the time. It's just a matter of time until something tears.  The problem is that there is no simple solution, since throwing at 110% is simply more effective than throwing at 90%. 90% gets you (essentially) limitless innings. But 110% makes your ERA half a run or a run lower (numbers made up for illustration). And it couldn't be more clear that when $millions and wins are on the line, essentially everyone picks the lower ERA over the more innings. An average MLB pitcher has an ERA in the mid-4s. If he backs it off to 90% so he can pitch into the 8th or 9th, he'll likely have an ERA in the mid-5s, which puts him in AAA. The difference between pacing and pitching until it breaks is often the difference between $7M a year and $70k a year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...