Jump to content

Rosenthal says Roberts wants 4 years to stay


McNulty

Recommended Posts

Link

If the Orioles intend to sign second baseman Brian Roberts long-term, they will need to offer him a four-year contract, major-league sources say.
Depending upon the economy, Roberts as a free agent likely would top the three-year, $30 million that the Dodgers recently awarded their own leadoff hitter, shortstop Rafael Furcal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd say give him the fourth year, something around 4/45 is reasonable. I know he likely won't be stealing as many bases in four years when he's 35, but the way he plays defensively and handles the bat in all situations is worth it. He will make a great #2 hitter if/when he slows down a bit and if we are able to find another leadoff guy. The way he fouls off pitches at will and works the count, along with his contact skills, he will be still playing the game at a valuable high level four years from now. His game is not solely based on his athleticism. He may be the smartest, most instinctive player we've had since Cal.

He is the leader of this team. He sets the tone for the night, every night. He's a true "professional baseball player."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is true the positive news is the Brian would actually sign with the O's.

IMO there is very little risk in a 4 year agreement for Brian. He would be 32-35 during the contract with him turning 36 during the last year of the contract playoffs.

Do I think Brian will be stealing as many bases at 35 as he does at 30? No, but I think he will maintain a high OBP. I also think he will stay pretty close to his current level of defensive ability. Brian works hard to stay in shape.

Is 4/44 too much in this economy? Well it is probably overpaying a bit. However, if MacPhail truely has no good trade offers for him, the situation has turned in Brian's favor. I am not in favor of getting two draft choices for him.

In the next month this needs to get done, one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester

Oh boy, the 3/30 is "more than enough" or "too much" crowd must have went out last night. They will be comin' soon.

3 years, 4 years - I tend to believe that there will not be a big drop-off.

Trade for the right package - I'd still be looking. With the news that he is willing to stay in Baltimore maybe his value goes up a little, i.e., he will be off of the market plus would like to sign before FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agree with this.   The number one priority should be locking up Henderson, Holliday, and to a lesser extent, Adley.   Not that I don't want Adley around...I'm just not sure how many years you want to invest in a catcher.   Making a deal for a guy like Burnes this year could be an annual/semi-annual kind of thing.   Maybe you splurge one year and trade for a guy with two years left before FA where you may have to give up a bigger prospect.    I don't think it's smart to have long-term money in pitching.  
    • Based on the current state of the organization, I'm curious to see what this homegrown rotation looks like. What are the odds there's an impact SP in Seth Johnson, Chayce McDermott, and Cade Povich? Pretty low. What are the odds all 3 are busts? Pretty low. A likely median scenario is you have 1 serviceable SP, a reliever, and a bust. Or something along those lines.  I for one am much happier Burnes is in the rotation rather than Bassit, Eovaldi, or someone of that caliber. My preference would have been both once we learned about the Bradish + Means injuries. This time, we paid for the Burnes type front of the rotation pitcher in years of prospect control. I don't think that will always be a luxury we can afford.  Almost an entirely homegrown lineup and a GM who has shown the ability to piece together a productive bullpen. The rotation is where you strike. But it takes investments. No reason the Nationals can sign Scherzer and go win themselves a World Series and that avenue of success building is cut off to our collection of billionaire owners running a bottom 5 payroll currently. 
    • I would go for older but still elite/above average guys in areas of need who will sign short term deals even if they are high AAV, like some of those Verlander and Nelson Cruz contracts. Sonny Gray would have been good this year. Not sure who the equivalent guys will be next year but I don't see us being in the market for 10+/$300+ type deals. At least I hope we aren't.
    • I do not think the Orioles will spend >$200m on annual payroll anytime soon, but they have room to sign. Burnes Ace type every 3-6 years.    I would offer $150 over 5 years with incentives and options that could exceed $200m, to hedge a sunk cost for injuries.
    • Interesting, and Smoltz’ point is not just valid, it illustrates a terrible tendency throughout society. And the pitch clock theory is ridiculous. But the problem isn’t hard throwing, but the twisting motion of the arm. Try just going through a throwing motion and at the end, sharply pronate or supinate your arm. Then do it at whatever your individual max effort is. I’m not even sure how to do it. But that extreme twisting movement can’t possibly be good.
    • We have to close the roof.
    • Kjerstad obliterating AAA pitching is almost to be expected at this point, so the thing I’m keeping a close eye on is his BB rate. Up at 11.5% now, while still maintaining only a 20.7% K rate. Very encouraging, since I’m sure pitchers are pitching him more carefully now. It’s good to see him willing to take those walks. He’s now turned the hard contact into power and he has good contact ability for a power guy, so the biggest flaw in his offensive profile is his aggressiveness and tendency to chase. I’m sure the Orioles’ message is that’s what they want to see improved from him at the AAA level. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...