Jump to content

Jorge Lopez is Back


Orioles Jim

Recommended Posts

a lot of overthinking this, the guy likely will barely pitch this season, probably sent to the pitching lab in offseason where Elias' crew probably thinks they can fix him and he be an effective reliever next year. at least i think he has another year of ARB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dale said:

I think they changed that rule a few years ago and now the waiver order is just based on record and it doesn't matter what league a team is in. 

Correct it just goes straight record so Braves didn’t get a chance, not sure on Dodgers because we are tied with them so not sure who got first crack at him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, could be a good chemistry guy that they want (even if he can’t pitch) to be in the bullpen as a leader of sorts during the postseason?

I don’t know, I think it’s clear they place some level of importance on team chemistry and maybe they see a fit here as a guy they like to be hanging around the pen in October?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Orioles Jim said:

Also, could be a good chemistry guy that they want (even if he can’t pitch) to be in the bullpen as a leader of sorts during the postseason?

I don’t know, I think it’s clear they place some level of importance on team chemistry and maybe they see a fit here as a guy they like to be hanging around the pen in October?

But Lopez isn't eligible to be on the post-season roster, so he won't be hanging around past Oct 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Winter said:

a lot of overthinking this, the guy likely will barely pitch this season, probably sent to the pitching lab in offseason where Elias' crew probably thinks they can fix him and he be an effective reliever next year. at least i think he has another year of ARB

But this could have happened anyway because no one was going to claim him and pay him his arb number.  He likely would have gone unclaimed and we could have signed in the offseason for a MiL deal.

So, there is something more to it than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dedwretched said:

Jorge was on the 15 day restricted list earlier this year with "mental health" issues. No word on what they were, but I wish the best for him! I know the struggle.

Many posters here understand the struggle.  Just read the game threads. 😆

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dale said:

I think they changed that rule a few years ago and now the waiver order is just based on record and it doesn't matter what league a team is in. 

When a player is on waivers, other teams can submit a claim. If more than one team does, those in the same league as that player's team get first priority, starting with the club with the worst record on the day of the claim. Then, the priority moves to the other league, starting with the worst record. For example, if a National League team puts a player on waivers, the NL team with the worst record gets the first shot at him, and the last-place American League club would be right behind the top NL club.

 

https://www.mlb.com/news/guide-to-baseball-s-waiver-trade-system-c140073380

This is the article I saw when I made my post. I did just notice it was from 2017 however, so does anyone know for sure if it's been changed since then?

 

Edited by hutchead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Orioles Jim said:

Also, could be a good chemistry guy that they want (even if he can’t pitch) to be in the bullpen as a leader of sorts during the postseason?

I don’t know, I think it’s clear they place some level of importance on team chemistry and maybe they see a fit here as a guy they like to be hanging around the pen in October?

Yeah, I don't believe this has anything to do with team "chemistry."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...