Jump to content

Game 1 Lineup Guesses


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Surprised this hasn't been a thread on this yet. Of course, we don't even know the rosters yet but we can guess the starting nine. 

Vs Jordan Montgomery, a LHP with fairly even splits.

C Adley

LF Hays

RF Santander

1B Mountcastle

SS Gunnar

DH Hicks

CF Mullins

2B Westburg

3B Ortiz

Going by matchups, Mateo is a consideration since Ramon does not have great splits vs LHP. Still, I am going with Westburg/Ortiz, with Ortiz in the 9 spot due to his reverse splits. 

Gunnar improved vs LHP but I'm still not liking his .210/.618 in a prime spot. I just don't think having him high in the order is a good idea in a playoff game, although we may regret batting him lower when it gets to the later innings. Sorry, Gunnar. I've got Hays batting second, although I am tempted to go with Hicks all of a sudden.

McCann could be a consideration but that would force Hicks to the bench. I'd look for him to maybe start a game later in the series if we are facing a LHP and have a lead, otherwise it's Adley C and Hicks DH vs LHP.

Anyone got a better lineup to win Game 1?

 

Isn't Heaney pitching not Montgomery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

The Os were top 10 vs lefties in terms of OpS. I’m guessing he sticks with what he did…but it does suck to potentially lose with your back ups.

Mateo is interesting. Do you want to play him and lose him when they lift him for a PHer and lose his speed late?

He actually has hit a bit the last couple of weeks. Best he has looked since April. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 Hays LF
(.262/.329/.456, 5 hr)

2 Rutschman C
(.304/.414/.481, 6 hr)

3 Santander DH
(.250/.353/.428, 5 hr)

4 Mountcastle 1B
(.338/.398/.655, 12 hr)

5. Hicks RF
(.349/.446/.524, 3 hr)

6 Henderson 3B
(.210/.293/.324, 3 hr)

7 Westburg 2B
(.284/.354/.432, 1 hr)

8 Mullins CF
(.233/.310/.398, 3 hr)

9 Mateo SS
(.276/.329/.417, 3 hr)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say that if it came down to a decision between Urias or Mateo, I'd rather have Urias at 3B for his defense and have Mateo off the bench as a pinch runner for his speed. There's also a statistic that shows every world series winner of the past so many decades has had the same consistent starting SS through the playoffs. We want to win the Wold Series. Therefore, we should do what is proven to win the world Series and keep Gunnar comfortable as the starting Shortstop rather than move him around each game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I will say that if it came down to a decision between Urias or Mateo, I'd rather have Urias at 3B for his defense and have Mateo off the bench as a pinch runner for his speed. There's also a statistic that shows every world series winner of the past so many decades has had the same consistent starting SS through the playoffs. We want to win the Wold Series. Therefore, we should do what is proven to win the world Series and keep Gunnar comfortable as the starting Shortstop rather than move him around each game.

But I won't complain if the Orioles feel that Mateo playing SS and Gunnar playing 3B gives them their best chance to win and decides to go that direction either. I trust the Analytical team and I trust Brandon Hyde's staff of coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
    • He’s an interesting test case. Prior to 2023, wasn’t good. In 2023, he threw around 200 innings iirc in the KBO and learned the sweeper. Now he is pitching much better. His statcast stats are pretty good although he’s not missing bats or getting Ks and he has a tendency to give up some hard contact.  
    • I don’t think he can be counted on for that. If you can get him cheap fine but his career WAR is 3.5 and he has 3.7 this year. Plus he’s 33 innings short of his career high …did 120-130 range twice. How could that be your acquisition that can be counted on when he could quite possibly run out of gas? Or get to a team where performance matters and feel the pressure versus pitching for the White Sox…A horrid team that everyone knew was going to suck.
    • Yea but how are you defining that?  Is Fedde a #3 or better, for example?
    • With all due respect … I think you are counting on Mayo to come up and immediately perform. I don’t think it’s realistic… possible yes. But, most guys have an adjustment. If it’s one thing we’ve seen from Hyde is the reluctance to give regular time to the rookies. Didn’t see it with Stowers, Norby, etc. They did  give it to Holliday but I think there was pressure being put on him to do so.  You think he would replace Urias who doesn’t play everyday with Mayo and sit the other guys to play him every day which is what a player needs during that adjustment period? 
    • Roch retweeted this. Lots of fans are speculating that it means Watkins is coming back to the Os. It makes some sense as we need fresh arms.  His numbers aren’t great this year but not sure that is going to matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...