Jump to content

Who are the 2023 Orioles #19 and #20 prospects?


Tony-OH

Who are the 2023 Orioles #19 and #20 prospects?  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are the 2023 Orioles #19 and #20 prospects?

    • Almeyda and Fabian
    • Arias and Almeyda
    • Bright and Willems
    • Fabian and Wagner
    • Wagner and Baumler

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I still have hope for Wagner, but assume Tony doesn't have him this high. I wanted to vote for him and Baumler.

I just don't know enough about the international guys to have any opinion of whether they belong here, so I went Bright and Willems. 

That said, it seems like Fabian should be above Willems at least, so it was probably a bad vote. If I had to do it over, I'd say Alymeda and Fabian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pure upside:  I like Baumler.  But he also has a pretty big risk factor.  He's only paired with Wagner, who has shown flashes but needs to take another step forward IMO.  Bright and Willems don't fit the upside dice roll at this point either.

Almeyda is a bit of 'follow the money' with the signing bonus.  He's paired with Fabian and Arias.

I'm concerned with Fabian's floor, but his upside and team need are good fits. 

But Arias is a bit more of an unknown.  

Almeyda and Arias to continue the international prospect trend.  Could be Almeyda/Fabian as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough one here.  I went with Almeyda and Fabian.  We paid a lot for Almeyda, more than either Tavera or Basallo, so Koby Perez clearly thought very highly of him and Koby has shown he knows what he’s doing.  Almeyda got hurt and didn’t really get a chance to show what he can do (.600 OPS in only 69 PA), but we’ve seen a lot of our international prospects have a slow start in the DSL and pick it up when they got to the GCL.   So, I don’t think Tony lets him slide out of the top 20.   20 is a good spot for Fabian, who still has upside despite his terrible K rate.   

All the guys listed are interesting.  Arias showed a pretty good bat this year, but his defense was flat out terrible.  He strikes me as a guy who might need to move to the OF, or 2B.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Tough one here.  I went with Almeyda and Fabian.  We paid a lot for Almeyda, more than either Tavera or Basallo, so Koby Perez clearly thought very highly of him and Koby has shown he knows what he’s doing.  Almeyda got hurt and didn’t really get a chance to show what he can do (.600 OPS in only 69 PA), but we’ve seen a lot of our international prospects have a slow start in the DSL and pick it up when they got to the GCL.   So, I don’t think Tony lets him slide out of the top 20.   20 is a good spot for Fabian, who still has upside despite his terrible K rate.   

All the guys listed are interesting.  Arias showed a pretty good bat this year, but his defense was flat out terrible.  He strikes me as a guy who might need to move to the OF, or 2B.
 

The BA write up on Arias suggested it was less than 50/50 but not impossible that he could stay at SS.   He only started 12 games at SS and his numbers are comparable to 18 yo Gunnar in the FCL so you never know.  Arias does have a plus arm.  I have a gut feeling that Almeyda doesn’t stick at SS either.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't want to vote for Almeyda but I wanted to vote for Arias because he put up very good offensive numbers at age 18 in the FCL, and there was no other way to vote for Arias other than Arias/Almeyda.   

Fabian...I love secondary skills as much as anyone, but a .176 batting average at Bowie?  I wonder if there's every been a successful major league hitter who hit .176 at AA at age 23.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I didn't want to vote for Almeyda but I wanted to vote for Arias because he put up very good offensive numbers at age 18 in the FCL, and there was no other way to vote for Arias other than Arias/Almeyda.   

Fabian...I love secondary skills as much as anyone, but a .176 batting average at Bowie?  I wonder if there's every been a successful major league hitter who hit .176 at AA at age 23.   

I can’t top that but Fabian hasn’t had a full season at AA.   I’m interested to see if he can make the adjustments this year.

I’m always reminded of Matt Holliday who, at age 22, hit .276 and OPS .768 in AA.  He returned to AA at age 23 and hit .253 and OPS .708.   
 

You don’t see a guy like that become a star very often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Three Run Homer said:

Fabian...I love secondary skills as much as anyone, but a .176 batting average at Bowie?  I wonder if there's every been a successful major league hitter who hit .176 at AA at age 23.

He’s listed at age 22 for this past season, but as best I can tell, since 2006, the answer to your question is “no.”

James McCann hit .200 back in 2012, which is probably your lowest BA at that age in AA for a reasonably successful ML hitter. Sean Murphy hit .209 in 2017, and now he’s a star. Teoscar Hernandez (2015) and Jeimer Candelario (2016) hit .219.

I actually don’t see anyone who has posted such a poor average at any age at AA and become a recognizable ML player. So that…does not feel like a great sign. Journeyman backup catcher Sandy Leon did hit for a .177 average at age 24, and he has managed to carve out a decent living for himself, so that’s something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/2023 at 12:16 PM, e16bball said:

He’s listed at age 22 for this past season, but as best I can tell, since 2006, the answer to your question is “no.”

James McCann hit .200 back in 2012, which is probably your lowest BA at that age in AA for a reasonably successful ML hitter. Sean Murphy hit .209 in 2017, and now he’s a star. Teoscar Hernandez (2015) and Jeimer Candelario (2016) hit .219.

I actually don’t see anyone who has posted such a poor average at any age at AA and become a recognizable ML player. So that…does not feel like a great sign. Journeyman backup catcher Sandy Leon did hit for a .177 average at age 24, and he has managed to carve out a decent living for himself, so that’s something.

This is some impressive research, thanks very much.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...