Jump to content

Winter Meetings Thread


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Snutchy said:

They all break. 

He’s got 3 years.  The problem is that we don’t know if those guys are even available.  Going to take a Cease like package for either Luzardo or Skubal.  

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-more said:
Quote

The Baltimore Orioles were always predicted to make a large splash this winter. Reports suggested they would and will play at the top of the pitching market. For many, that means pursuing high-profile free agents to round out the roster that won 101 wins last season. 

This quote alone raises a red flag for me. 

I am not convinced that Kade Kistner (by his own modest admission a driving force in sports journalism) is 1. not AI to begin with (see below), and 2. not some random 23 year-old recent journalism grad with $80,000 in student loan debt and visions of being the next Ken Rosenthal currently working 16 freelance sports gigs hoping to avoid eating dog food for the third night in a row.

Also note that SI has been busted a couple of times recently for using AI without notifying its readers.

https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2023-12-01/column-the-depressing-fall-of-sports-illustrated-reveals-the-real-tragedy-of-ai

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/11/28/sports-illustrated-ai-articles/

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, B-more said:

I don’t believe Skubal is available and I think the overpayment it would take to get him would be over the top.

Luzardo is interesting. He just had an actual full season. Before last year, he just hadn’t been that durable. 
 

I would like to get him but I’m not sure I trade much more for him than I would for Cease. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 24fps said:

This quote alone raises a red flag for me. 

I am not convinced that Kade Kistner (by his own modest admission a driving force in sports journalism) is 1. not AI to begin with (see below), and 2. not some random 23 year-old recent journalism grad with $80,000 in student loan debt and visions of being the next Ken Rosenthal currently working 16 freelance sports gigs hoping to avoid eating dog food for the third night in a row.

Also note that SI has been busted a couple of times recently for using AI without notifying its readers.

https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2023-12-01/column-the-depressing-fall-of-sports-illustrated-reveals-the-real-tragedy-of-ai

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/11/28/sports-illustrated-ai-articles/

 

The actual story is by Rosenthal in the Athletic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Braves strike.  Jarred Kelenic, Marco Gonzalez, Evan White for Jackson Kowar, and Cole Phillips.

Kowar has been horrible in parts of 3 years and Phillips is a 20 yo RHP who was a 2nd round pick in 2022 and still hasn’t made his debut.  Almost seems like a dump by the Mariners.   Mainers with a big FA signing coming up.  They needed offense and have traded their 3B and LF and non tendered their RF.  Hmmmm.

 

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The actual story is by Rosenthal in the Athletic.

...seem... could... say (as in for example)... followed by two paragraphs describing Luzardo's resumé looks more like a deadline-induced throwaway than a report to me.

Rosenthal is real, but quotes attributed to him are unlikely to be legally contested as long as they're correct, and that opens up a very large opportunity to play fast-and-loose with the appearance of journalistic credibility.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interesting trade here:

Does getting Gonzalez put Atlanta out on Cease . You would think no but they have 4 other starters. Unless they are trading Fried, they may not need anyone else.

Does trading Kellenic increase the need of the Mariners to get positional talent?  Of course, trading Gonzalez may make their pitching harder to get now.

Both of those things could impact the Os.

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

Trade Santander and ERod becomes a net gain of $8 million-ish.  We need a spot for Kjerstad/Cowser after all, right?

I think at this moment in time, Santander is too valuable to the offensive production to be able to trade for a pitcher. He's the most productive RBI guy we have and the only true Middle Of the Order Bat we have. (Although I think Gunnar could soon be considered as one.) Yes, Kjerstad and Cowswer can be considered to get playing time but we've already seen how that went for Cowser in 2023 and we witnessed Gunnar struggle to hit at the beginning of his Rookie season he got off to a slow start. So having a reliable established bat like Santander to cushion that learning curve will be essential. It's essential to have established reliable production in the lineup while those guys make progress in their development before they can be relied on to replace any starter. Maybe in 2025 it will be possible to count on the young guns as reliable starting outfielders, but I'm not doing it to start 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I think at this moment in time, Santander is too valuable to the offensive production to be able to trade for a pitcher. He's the most productive RBI guy we have and the only true Middle Of the Order Bat we have. (Although I think Gunnar could soon be considered as one.) Yes, Kjerstad and Cowswer can be considered to get playing time but we've already seen how that went for Cowser in 2023 and we witnessed Gunnar struggle to hit at the beginning of his Rookie season he got off to a slow start. So having a reliable established bat like Santander to cushion that learning curve will be essential. It's essential to have established reliable production in the lineup while those guys make progress in their development before they can be relied on to replace any starter. Maybe in 2025 it will be possible to count on the young guns as reliable starting outfielders, but I'm not doing it to start 2024.

A completely reasonable position IMO.  My point was that without a substantial increase in payroll (which I don't expect) tradeoffs will be the order of the day and acquiring a FA starter might require gambling on a rookie elsewhere beyond everyone's comfort zone.  Perhaps Elias' as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Really interesting trade here:

Does getting Gonzalez put Atlanta out on Cease . You would think no but they have 4 other starters. Unless they are trading Fried, they may not need anyone else.

Does trading Kellenic increase the need of the Mariners to get positional talent?  Of course, trading Gonzalez may make their pitching harder to get now.

Both of those things could impact the Os.

I doubt Gonzales would put the Braves out on Cease any more than Cole Irvin puts the Orioles out on Cease. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I think at this moment in time, Santander is too valuable to the offensive production to be able to trade for a pitcher. He's the most productive RBI guy we have and the only true Middle Of the Order Bat we have. (Although I think Gunnar could soon be considered as one.) Yes, Kjerstad and Cowswer can be considered to get playing time but we've already seen how that went for Cowser in 2023 and we witnessed Gunnar struggle to hit at the beginning of his Rookie season he got off to a slow start. So having a reliable established bat like Santander to cushion that learning curve will be essential. It's essential to have established reliable production in the lineup while those guys make progress in their development before they can be relied on to replace any starter. Maybe in 2025 it will be possible to count on the young guns as reliable starting outfielders, but I'm not doing it to start 2024.

If Elias is following his plan trading Santander happens now or at the deadline. I know we are competing but he’s too valuable to let walk after the season for nothing. I’m not convinced they will tender him based on the projected salary so you can’t point to a comp pick we may not receive. I think decisions like this are the Orioles operating standard under Elias as long as John Angelos is the decision maker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Baltimore and DC surrounding population around 9 million. NYC around 24 million.
    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...