Jump to content

Would you pitch Corbin Burnes 3/28, 4/2 and 4/7


Just Regular

Would you pitch Corbin Burnes 3/28, 4/2 and 4/7  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you pitch Corbin Burnes 3/28, 4/2 and 4/7


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/18/24 at 18:39

Recommended Posts

There are interesting pushes and pulls - a small investment now might result in the flexibility for more rest in September if the team is very successful.

Last year the Orioles more or less knowing what would happen burnt out Tyler Wells and I think they are about to do it again.    Post-trade deadline roster composition is just another universe.

With the rainout cushions, early season offdays are abundant if you think you might need or want 33 not 32 starts.

Here are some of Burnes days of rest readouts (4/5/6+) across his starting career - it is an especially interesting with him as I believe planned extra rest helped him achieve his Peak Pedro career year.    2021 was also the COVID + 1 year, so maybe that is what drove the Club doing 28 rather than 32-33 starts.

2021 - 2/17/9, the Pedro year

2022 - 15/15/3, even this year he achieved 33 starts, it wasn't until Memorial Day a 5th day between turns was discontinued*

2023 - 6/23/3

In both 2022 and 2023, Burnes faced about 20% more batters with only "normal human superstar" results.

Every 2024 inning above 200 Burnes can thrive in is another million above 200 Boras can negotiate for.     What will Burnes/Boras want to do day to day as the season rolls along?

*it was also in the June-September 2022 heavy use frame that he "failed in September" leading to the feel good arbitration process of 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oriole said:

He’s arguably the only bonafide major league starter in the rotation. No sense in wearing him out early. 

I do not think there is a GM in baseball that wouldn't consider Rodriguez and Kremer "bonafide major league starters".

Kremer has started 53 games over the last two seasons and put up a 3.74 ERA, if he isn't a bonafide major league starter than neither is John Means or the vast majority of starting pitchers in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big Mac said:

I do not think there is a GM in baseball that wouldn't consider Rodriguez and Kremer "bonafide major league starters".

Kremer has started 53 games over the last two seasons and put up a 3.74 ERA, if he isn't a bonafide major league starter than neither is John Means or the vast majority of starting pitchers in the league.

Or Irvin, quite frankly.

That post was outrageous. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big Mac said:

I do not think there is a GM in baseball that wouldn't consider Rodriguez and Kremer "bonafide major league starters".

Kremer has started 53 games over the last two seasons and put up a 3.74 ERA, if he isn't a bonafide major league starter than neither is John Means or the vast majority of starting pitchers in the league.

Yep, my terminology is certainly subjective. My intent was something along the lines of top of the rotation or close to it with a track record. Kremer could have a 3.50 or 5.00 ERA, neither will surprise me. Same goes for any one else currently in the rotation.

My point remains the same though, Burnes is the only one with a track record of success (should’ve just said that I guess). 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oriole said:

Yep, my terminology is certainly subjective. My intent was something along the lines of top of the rotation or close to it with a track record. Kremer could have a 3.50 or 5.00 ERA, neither will surprise me. Same goes for any one else currently in the rotation.

My point remains the same though, Burnes is the only one with a track record of success (should’ve just said that I guess). 

How many starters in MLB have never had an ERA above 3.5? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Initial 20-ish responses it is about 2-1 against, and I am also a No this early.

Roster management wise, it would let Tyler Wells cool it in the bullpen a couple weeks if we are trying to get him to the finish line without a summer hiatus.

How much the Orioles will lean into their one year of Burnes will be interesting as the year goes along.    No pitcher in the world gets to do what Milwaukee CC Sabathia did anymore, but Elias having Burnes for 1 year is about as close to a perfect storm as there could be for a strong Club having short term access to a very strong Arm.

The AL East is serious competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...