Jump to content

Adley Rutschman 2024


joelala

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Before today, Burnes had allowed 26 stolen bases.   Nobody else on the team had allowed more than 7.  But yeah, it’s Adley’s fault.  

Just think how many more he would have allowed if McCann wasn't his personal catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Every stolen base today was 100% on Corbin Burnes, who sucks at that aspect of the game. 

As to framing, I’m simply not seeing what you’re seeing.  

 

Burnes didn’t give him much chance.  
 

I’m just looking at the throws.  Weak. Slow. Inaccurate. 
 

The throwing, for me, is a secondary issue I’ve noticed. 

Watch ball 4 to Lane Thomas in 1st as an example.  He’s not bringing ball into zone consistently.  He’s just catching.  Not receiving with a purpose and intent.  

 

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Before today, Burnes had allowed 26 stolen bases.   Nobody else on the team had allowed more than 7.  But yeah, it’s Adley’s fault.  

Stolen bases aside, it's rare that Burnes gives up 4 runs. Maybe 2 or 3 times all season? And 3 runs like 8-10 times. I dunno where to look for this stuff but what are the splits between Adley vs McCann on ER allowed or, even, walks allowed? I don't see Corbin being at all phased by a stolen base or which base a base runner is on, he has that much confidence in himself. The framing might be the reason why we see McCann catching him more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Every stolen base today was 100% on Corbin Burnes, who sucks at that aspect of the game. 

As to framing, I’m simply not seeing what you’re seeing.  

 

I haven't noticed it either but Staircase seems to agree. It puts Adley at #46 in framing runs at -2. Screened by >1500 pitches that puts him at #20. Last year he was +5 and +4 in 2022. Hopefully an outlier year but something to keep an eye on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oh-wee-ohs said:

Stolen bases aside, it's rare that Burnes gives up 4 runs. Maybe 2 or 3 times all season? And 3 runs like 8-10 times. I dunno where to look for this stuff but what are the splits between Adley vs McCann on ER allowed or, even, walks allowed? I don't see Corbin being at all phased by a stolen base or which base a base runner is on, he has that much confidence in himself. The framing might be the reason why we see McCann catching him more. 

Per Statcast, Adley is -2 framing this year, McCann is -5.   After today, Burnes has a 2.81 ERA when Adley catches (13 games), 2.40 with McCann (10 games).   Pretty trivial.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Burnes didn’t give him much chance.  
 

I’m just looking at the throws.  Weak. Slow. Inaccurate. 
 

The throwing, for me, is a secondary issue I’ve noticed. 

Watch ball 4 to Lane Thomas in 1st as an example.  He’s not bringing ball into zone consistently.  He’s just catching.  Not receiving with a purpose and intent.  

 

I blame the umpire for missing the correct strike zone, not the catcher framing. The umpire is supposed to watch the ball not that catcher's mitt!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Following up on my post from yesterday.  I spent some time looking at the statcast framing numbers. 
https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/catcher_framing?year=2024&team=&min=q&type=catcher&sort=4,1

That tracks with the eye test.  Adley is 44th out of 60 Catchers in framing(overall).  The AB I pointed out last night to Lane Thomas (Low pitch) is the location I’ve seen him continue to struggle with.  He just reached down and pushed the ball below the zone instead of getting under it and  bringing it into the zone.  

Digging further if you look at Zone 17 (low outside to RHB), Zone 18 (low middle), and Zone 19 (low inside RHB) you’ll see that he ranks 43rd, 53rd, & 56th in those locations.

Interestingly enough, his best zones are the ones above the strike zone.  In Zone 11(up & outside to RHB), Zone 12 (up middle), and Zone 13 (up and inside to RHB) he ranks 2nd, 4th, & 1st.  So maybe he/Orioles put more emphasis on those pitches? Maybe that’s where they are focusing on the zone?  


But with all that said, he calls the pitches & locations, he knows what they are trying to achieve, so to me there really isn’t much excuse for not putting forth a better effort on framing the low pitch locations.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

Following up on my post from yesterday.  I spent some time looking at the statcast framing numbers. 
https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/catcher_framing?year=2024&team=&min=q&type=catcher&sort=4,1

That tracks with the eye test.  Adley is 44th out of 60 Catchers in framing(overall).  The AB I pointed out last night to Lane Thomas (Low pitch) is the location I’ve seen him continue to struggle with.  He just reached down and pushed the ball below the zone instead of getting under it and  bringing it into the zone.  

Digging further if you look at Zone 17 (low outside to RHB), Zone 18 (low middle), and Zone 19 (low inside RHB) you’ll see that he ranks 43rd, 53rd, & 56th in those locations.

Interestingly enough, his best zones are the ones above the strike zone.  In Zone 11(up & outside to RHB), Zone 12 (up middle), and Zone 13 (up and inside to RHB) he ranks 2nd, 4th, & 1st.  So maybe he/Orioles put more emphasis on those pitches? Maybe that’s where they are focusing on the zone?  


But with all that said, he calls the pitches & locations, he knows what they are trying to achieve, so to me there really isn’t much excuse for not putting forth a better effort on framing the low pitch locations.  
 

 

How many of our pitchers work low in the zone on a consistent basis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

How many of our pitchers work low in the zone on a consistent basis?

Yea, that's what I've been looking at.  After seeing the #s on high in the zone it made look at it a little differently.  But like I said, he's calling the pitches so he knows where the location should be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Yea, that's what I've been looking at.  After seeing the #s on high in the zone it made look at it a little differently.  But like I said, he's calling the pitches so he knows where the location should be.  

Yea I get that but if most of the pitchers are working up in the zone, it makes sense that he and the Os are putting an emphasis on the higher strike.

Now, he should be able to handle both but just makes you wonder what the team is pushing.

Hes also not catching consistently enough, so you wonder if that’s effecting him too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Yea, that's what I've been looking at.  After seeing the #s on high in the zone it made look at it a little differently.  But like I said, he's calling the pitches so he knows where the location should be.  

Very anecdotal opini9n here:  There's quite a bit of bad location from pitchers too.  Especially when Aldey/McCann have a knee down and leg extended.  Receiving and framing a pitch thrown that far out of the shoulders is tough.  And setting up with a leg extended might help frame low pitches but limits mobility to catch a pitch within your shoulders.  But should he set up that way calling for a mid/high pitch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, btdart20 said:

Very anecdotal opini9n here:  There's quite a bit of bad location from pitchers too.  Especially when Aldey/McCann have a knee down and leg extended.  Receiving and framing a pitch thrown that far out of the shoulders is tough.  And setting up with a leg extended might help frame low pitches but limits mobility to catch a pitch within your shoulders.  But should he set up that way calling for a mid/high pitch?

Your first point has some credence.  If pitchers are missing by a ton, it makes his job incredibly more difficult and has to almost 'play the defensive' with framing vs. really attaching and pushing the limit of what he can steal. 

He's framing the high ones well.  He's top of the leaderboard on all the high zones.  It doesn't look like he's getting his body low enough to be consistent with the low zone locations.  That would be my complaint is that he's almost too upright.  Maybe he's nursing an injury, maybe he's banged up, maybe he's just grinding out there and conserving energy, but for the last few weeks+ it's seemed he can't get the stealable low pitch called a strike.  

There is a thread on here about playing him into that ground.  Maybe that plays into it and he's more banged up than anyone can imagine.  That's party of the gig being a catcher.  I don't want people to think I'm knocking the guy or think he stinks, but he's show he can be elite at receiving and just takes me as odd that his ability has depreciated so much so quickly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Been waiting a while to posts this, but today was the straw that broke the camels back. 
 

Adley’s receiving is lazy and approaching  pathetic.  He gave so many pitches away on borderline pitches for Burnes today that should have been called strikes.  Just poor mechanics and laziness.  Thats the receiving…. 
 

Moving forward it’s going to be a track meet when he’s behind the plate, because he has no chance of throwing runners out.  Poor arm strength and even poorer accuracy.  
 

He needs to figure out a way make his defense a priority and make some fundamentally substantial changes for the better.  
 

I’m not impressed.  

How quickly people forget that Severino was the every day catcher not too long ago. 
Zero of the stolen bases were on him and his framing was just fine. I’m sure the umps scorecard will reflect the bad calls and missed calls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sevastras said:

How quickly people forget that Severino was the every day catcher not too long ago. 
Zero of the stolen bases were on him and his framing was just fine. I’m sure the umps scorecard will reflect the bad calls and missed calls. 

Catching Burnes this year:

Adley 80 ip 20 SB

McCann 63.2 ip 11 SB

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • And btw, I’m not saying you try to field a team that is only made of players 25 years old or younger…you need some vets…but get good ones. If you are going to block these kids, who are really talented, block them with players that are actual difference makers.    I know they were hamstrung by Angelos and that hurt obviously but you could have done more with what you had imo.
    • Is Norby going to be the 2020s Steve Finley?  
    • This is what I’m talking about though.    The Orioles are acting weird imo. Yes, winning matters and changes how you operate but this is a team that has done nothing but try to build from within and pat themselves on the back for how well they are developing but then they turn around and don’t use the guys you developed.    You block them with guys like Frazier, Hicks or Jimenez or whoever else over the last 1-3 years. And we aren’t blocking them with good players. We are blocking them with over the hill vets who don’t provide much value. Thats what I find odd. Would Cowser be even better had you just played him last year?  Would Kjerstad be further along if he had been given better chances?  Would you have dealt Norby and/or Stowers if you played them?     It’s really frustrating to me. It’s like they went all in with tanking/rebuilding for 1-2 years too long but then when it comes time for that pay off, they don’t fully follow through. Again, I know winning changed things but really, winning last year should have always been the plan, so they should not have been caught off guard.
    • Basically, the only big driver is winning and, to a much lesser extent, investment. Basically, if investment creates more winning, the fans will come. Rubenstein needs to make a splash. Right now, we've just seen him throw hats around and slap T Rowe Price everywhere he can. The rubber meets the road this offseason. If the O's putter out and have an early exit in the playoffs, are season ticket sales going to skyrocket? I don't think so. Let's look at what happened the last time the O's started winning. In 2011, they stunk and bottomed out at around 1.75m fans In 2012, they surprised everybody and not only had a winning season for the first time in forever, but they made the playoffs, too. Attendance went up to 2.1m In 2013, on the heels of a playoff appearance and apparently renewed interest in the team that doesn't suck perpetually, attendance went up even though they missed the playoffs at 2.35m fans In 2014, the O's won the division, but coming off a playoff-less year in 2013, attendance only went up 100k fans from 2.35m to 2.46m Now, 2015 was an aberration, IMHO. About the only time I'll ever say that crime perception impacted attendance was 2015 due to the Freddie Gray protests. Attendance dropped to around 2.3m from 2.46m. Now, it could be because of the protests, but it also could be that the team was mediocre. They didn't have a winning season, and only won 81 games. Attendance dropped again 2016, even though they made the playoffs, but they won 89 games and lost in the WC game. From then on, it's pretty obvious. They kept losing and losing spectacularly. COVID, etc.  Anyways, I don't see a world which the team exceeds 2.5m fans/year. The Nats coming to town really destroyed the upside. Even if Rubenstein starts spending money and the team makes major upgrades to the stadium experience...the ceiling is probably around the 2.5m fans/year number. Which, let's be frank, would be averaging nearly 31k fans/game. Just win. BTW, I wrote an article on this and did some analysis on whether winning, the homicide rate, and/or spending has an impact on attendance and, well: https://stephenpauladams.substack.com/p/orioles-attendance-is-up The main takeaway is winning matters, spending has little correlation, and the homicide rate has a very weak correlation.  The Rubenstein era will be interesting since this is a fresh slate and you don't have the fan apathy because of Angelos/constant losing.
    • Or maybe just given regular playing time instead of getting two hits and getting benched the next day.
    • I disagree.  @Frobby just listed 8 pitchers and that doesn't include Morfe, and Reilly that we got at the trade deadline.  We're never going to have that high end high school pitching prospect phenom, but Morfe might be close.  I think are pitching is a little underrated.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...