Jump to content

Do Jon Miller and/or Gary Thorne belong in the Orioles Hall of Fame?


Frobby

Do Jon Miller and/or Gary Thorne belong in the Orioles Hall of Fame?  

72 members have voted

  1. 1. Do Jon Miller and/or Gary Thorne belong in the Orioles Hall of Fame?

    • Both Miller and Thorne should get in
    • Only Miller should get in
    • Only Thorne should get in
      0
    • Neither should get in


Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The main argument would be tenure.  Manfra announced here almost twice as long as the other two.  Of course, by that logic Jim Hunter (1997-2020) should be in ahead of Miller or Thorne.  You’ll notice I didn’t ask about him.  

I mean that is an interesting point though. Nobody really liked Hunter, but he was a good Oriole soldier for forever. Manfra wasn't an incredible PBP guy by any means, but people liked his demeanor and his voice. 

Kind of interesting to compare both guys. Ultimately, is Manfra just in there because of his voice? Seems a bit unfair to Hunter. The Orioles sure liked him enough to employ him for over a decade. Why not put him in. And that's coming from someone who really, really did not like Hunter. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, interloper said:

I mean that is an interesting point though. Nobody really liked Hunter, but he was a good Oriole soldier for forever. Manfra wasn't an incredible PBP guy by any means, but people liked his demeanor and his voice. 

Kind of interesting to compare both guys. Ultimately, is Manfra just in there because of his voice? Seems a bit unfair to Hunter. The Orioles sure liked him enough to employ him for over a decade. Why not put him in. And that's coming from someone who really, really did not like Hunter. 

More than two decades.   Truth is, on radio he was way better at play by play than Manfra.  But Manfra was a humble guy and Hunter was kind of full of himself.  On TV, he loved to ask these leading questions to the color man, the subtext of which was “I know so much about baseball, don’t you agree?” Drove me nuts, except I’d enjoy it when Palmer would answer in a way that had a subtext of “you have no idea what you’re talking about, you pompous moron.”

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

More than two decades.   Truth is, on radio he was way better at play by play than Manfra.  But Manfra was a humble guy and Hunter was kind of full of himself.  On TV, he loved to ask these leading questions to the color man, the subtext of which was “I know so much about baseball, don’t you agree?” Drove me nuts, except I’d enjoy it when Palmer would answer in a way that had a subtext of “you have no idea what you’re talking about, you pompous moron.”

Math was never my strong suit, lol. 

And yes! I love when Palmer does that, and he would get Hunter with that all the time. Like, no I'm not just going to agree with you, I'm going to slightly subvert your expectation and come up with a smarter thought about the topic, and make you sound kind of dumb in the process. I used to love that. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thinking is very few broadcasters should be in the O's HOF, and only reserved for great broadcasters with long tenures and who were loved by the fans.  Using that criteria, I'd only have Chuck Thompson and Jon Miller in the O's HOF.  I think it cheapens the award to have Manfra and Angel in it.  If those two guys made it, then why not Mel Proctor??  IMO, he was a much better baseball broadcaster than either of them, even though he had a relatively short tenure.

As for Thorne, he's a very good broadcaster in general but he made way too many obvious mistakes and didn't know baseball well at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Otter said:

  If those two guys made it, then why not Mel Proctor??  IMO, he was a much better baseball broadcaster than either of them, even though he had a relatively short tenure.

Not as short as I thought.  According to this chart, he was here from 1984-1996.  I definitely didn’t realize he was here that long.   Funny, I barely remember what he was like.  I mainly remember him being a good foil for John Lowenstein.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven’t even read the comments before saying yes. Compared to the embarrassing mess that is the current entire broadcast system, I cannot imagine anything other than regretful tears that Thorne and Miller are gone. 
Has anyone equaled the “He’s not gonna throw it at all!” Call? And not just that one. “CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? REIMOLD….and CLEVENGER.” Not fancy wordplay, but an infectious excitement, and a perfect Bass baritone voice with just a hint of gravel in it. 
Again, it’s not just the word choice, but the way they are delivered, and the voice that delivers them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m reading the other comments now, and it’s wonderful how many comments have referenced the “don’t throw it at all” call. Now, to illustrate the difference between Thorne and the modern bunch, try and imagine Newman(shudder) or Brown calling that same play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Philip said:

I’m reading the other comments now, and it’s wonderful how many comments have referenced the “don’t throw it at all” call. Now, to illustrate the difference between Thorne and the modern bunch, try and imagine Newman(shudder) or Brown calling that same play. 

I could see Brown doing it well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Br10n said:

Löwenstein was the best. I loved when Mel Proctor would say I have no idea what he (Löwenstein) is saying, your on your own for this one folks. 

I only heard Mel Proctor when he was working the Rangers games, and I really liked him. I don’t remember whether he worked with Dick Risenhoover or Mark Holtz, but I think he worked with Mark Holtz, although he was on his own for a little while, but I really liked him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Not as short as I thought.  According to this chart, he was here from 1984-1996.  I definitely didn’t realize he was here that long.   Funny, I barely remember what he was like.  I mainly remember him being a good foil for John Lowenstein.  

Exactly.  I don't know if it's just nostalgia from my younger days, but they are my favorite O's announcing team.  I loved how they could make horrible seasons and games entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Fred Biletnikoff!  King of Stick.  Lol.  The refs hated him because every time he touched the ball it got the gook all over it and then the refs got it all over themselves.  Lol  And I agree that it should be allowed in a modest way in MLB. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. What year was it before they started checking Pitchers after every half inning for sticky substances?  There was a year where it was pretty clear that pitchers were using something... tacki-goo?  I forget what year that was.  Were arm injuries up that year?  It might sway me a little if they were, but otherwise I don't think the the firmness of the grip is indicative of the spin.  The firmness of the grip is the control of the ball itself.  A harder grip would diminish spin.  Think of it as "english" in tennis.  The racquet glances the ball, but its the speed of the racquet that determines the spin.
    • We could be the Astros who have won 2 WS appeared in another. And been to what FIVE consecutive ALCS? With the extreme approach that we took to amass this kind of talent, I would rather set the bar high. We didn’t need to undergo the misery of extreme tanking just to have a team that could qualify for the playoffs each year. The Brewers and Guardians have that and they didn’t employ the extreme tank tactics. What we did forced MLB to change the rules to prevent it from being done again.
    • Agree.  It’s almost universal amongst all sports that size is valued when evaluating amateurs for projection.  
    • Burnes, Westburg, Ohearn, Grayson, Kimbrel, Santander. In that order.
    • I don’t think it’s a big deal about the report that the Orioles made a call about Crochet. That’s just Elias doing his job and professional due diligence. I’m sure he has and is making a lot of “calls”. I also don’t see teams like KC or SEA trading their best pitchers for players like Mountcastle, Urias, Hays, etc. That is a net negative for those teams. They are actually trying to win too and have very smart people running their orgs. The chances of us shedding spare parts for prime time pieces are very very slim. It is not likely that we are going to swindle anyone. It’s more likely to be a value for value exchange.
    • My preference is to be good for 10 years.  The best teams rarely wins.  Let’s be consistent like the Ravens in 2007-2012 and win one.  Or the Braves.  Make a move for a great reliever, sure, but that shouldn’t cost the elite talent.
    • Son of a gun.  I was just going to find Frobby’s double digit strikeout thread and post this.  😀
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...