Jump to content

Poll - Would you trade Cowser, McDermott, Norby, and Stowers for Crochet?


Poll - Would you trade Cowser, McDermott, Norby, and Stowers for Crochet?  

143 members have voted

  1. 1. Poll - Would you trade Cowser, McDermott, Norby, and Stowers for Crochet?

    • Yes
      15
    • No
      129


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Crochet seems like the worst of both worlds. He can’t help you as a starter, and he’s limited to how often he can pitch as a reliever. If this team wasn’t in contention, sure…cool pickup. But why not just get a real reliever and a starter that isn’t innings limited? 

What you listed above is why I don’t think Crochet is coming here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The additional years of control.

That screams offseason acquisition to me then unless Chicago is insistent on unloading him this deadline.  I'm much more ok with giving up Cowser if it's an offseason deal, because we can sign someone or work something else out to cover for him, and because we would be starting fresh with a new season come 2025 without having to worry about weakening a playoff team down the stretch.  We can't do that midseason and we don't have any other legitimate CFs.

Edited by Hallas
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Those threads were about trading Cease, not one specific proposed Cease trade.   In fact, the thread on Soxtalk wasn’t just about the Orioles, but any team trading for Cease.   The threads here that were devoted to a specific trade involved Cowser and Ortiz being packaged.   Not pitchers, not four players.  

It’s the framework of the Cease deal plus a 4th player for the extra .5 season and 3rd playoffs. 

The Cease thread was Cowser, Norby, and Stowers. Some were willing to give Povich in place of Stowers. This is the same deal. In this deal we’re paying McDermott for a half season and extra playoffs for Crochet. 

It’s just a discussion. We all have different opinions. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Malike said:

If I were a betting man I'd bet that the O's trade Cowser/Kjerstad before anyone else. We'll know in a few weeks I guess.

I'd give up Kjerstad 100/100 before Cowser.  We can't backfill someone that can handle CF and Kjerstad has a bat-first COF/DH replacement knocking on the door already.  And that replacement has a quicker path to playing time because he bats right handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The additional years of control.

I suppose, but you’re hamstringing your club this year to keep a guy that isn’t going to help you all that much. I suppose you could just option him to the minors and then make other options, but it’d seem odd to trade a lot of your farm capital to not help the club this year when they definitely need help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Poll - Would you trade Cowser, McDermott, Norby, and Stowers for Crochet?

This pretty much the Cease package we offered, or so it seems.

I would substitute Kjerstad for Cowser and do it but I voted no in this poll.  Cowser’s offensive upside combined with his defense?   Can’t do it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

They shouldn't just be looking at this season tho right?

What's the 2025 opening day rotation look like right now?

Even if you just slot him in the pen the rest of the season that's value for this season.

My point is, if I’m giving up assets, I want it to help win a WS THIS season. If they’re confident Crochet can contribute, I’m all for it. But I don’t know how they could be confident. If they’re not, then fing another target. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fiver6565 said:

My point is, if I’m giving up assets, I want it to help win a WS THIS season. If they’re confident Crochet can contribute, I’m all for it. But I don’t know how they could be confident. If they’re not, then fing another target. 

What if he's a bullpen arm for the rest of the season (which is a need)?

I don't think he's immediately getting shut down by a team if they trade for him during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What if he's a bullpen arm for the rest of the season (which is a need)?

I don't think he's immediately getting shut down by a team if they trade for him during the season.

And then blows out and those 2 years become a big ole 0.  Would be fun to watch those 4 guys put up 23 years of combined service.  
 

I know I know, you can’t count on them to reach their full potential and accrue their full service time.  

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s the framework of the Cease deal plus a 4th player for the extra .5 season and 3rd playoffs. 

The Cease thread was Cowser, Norby, and Stowers. Some were willing to give Povich in place of Stowers. This is the same deal. In this deal we’re paying McDermott for a half season and extra playoffs for Crochet. 

It’s just a discussion. We all have different opinions. 

Crochet has 1 good season….Cease was a good starter with an elite season. I don’t see how the return would be the same. Besides ….Cease returned a low #85 top 100 and some filler. Cowser is better by far than a #85 prospect. Why would we need to give 3 others players? In fact Cowser and Norby would be way to much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s the framework of the Cease deal plus a 4th player for the extra .5 season and 3rd playoffs. 

The Cease thread was Cowser, Norby, and Stowers. Some were willing to give Povich in place of Stowers. This is the same deal. In this deal we’re paying McDermott for a half season and extra playoffs for Crochet. 

It’s just a discussion. We all have different opinions. 

I don’t even know what my opinion is.  But we did not have hundreds of posts in the Cease threads using this “framework.”   There were dozens of permutations under discussion, and this was not a dominant one IMO.

https://forum.orioleshangout.com/topic/50079-would-you-trade-cowser-and-ortiz-for-cease/#comment-3047679

https://forum.orioleshangout.com/topic/50339-would-you-trade-cowser-and-ortiz-for-cease-december-follow-up/#comment-3053741

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t even know what my opinion is.  But we did not have hundreds of posts in the Cease threads using this “framework.”   There were dozens of permutations under discussion, and this was not a dominant one IMO.

https://forum.orioleshangout.com/topic/50079-would-you-trade-cowser-and-ortiz-for-cease/#comment-3047679

https://forum.orioleshangout.com/topic/50339-would-you-trade-cowser-and-ortiz-for-cease-december-follow-up/#comment-3053741

 

I wonder what Getz thinks of Ortiz’ 2.1 WAR these days.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

And then blows out and those 2 years become a big ole 0.  Would be fun to watch those 4 guys put up 23 years of combined service.  
 

I know I know, you can’t count on them to each take potential and mature their service time.  

So if you know, why are you saying it?

You can't keep them all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, it really is interesting because when I watch Lowe in regular season games, he (like many of the Tampa hitters) has quality at-bats and is very tough to get out. I have always thought of him as a really solid player and I actually feel bad for him because that kind of narrative comes to define you as a player for a lot of fans.....especially your own fanbase and especially when they have never won the whole thing. The good news is the narrative can change quickly, but you really do have to come through at some point to help your team win the title. Even though it was just one game and one series, I think Game 5 of the 1983 World Series was extremely important to Eddie Murray's legacy given it was on the heels of an 0-21 streak ending the 1979 series and 2-16 heading into that final game in Philly.   
    • If we have the money to sign him, he would absolutely be my #1 target, ahead of Burnes and Soto. 
    • Yeah, that game was amazing. The precursor to that was on Monday in Atlanta in Game 1 of the DH. The Mets had a 6-3 lead going to the bottom of the 8th and the Braves scored 4, topped off by an Albies bases loaded double.  So they went to the 9th down 7-6 after a really disheartening inning. Then Lindor hit a 2-run homer in the top of the 9th and the Mets ended up winning 8-7, which sent them to the playoffs.  When you do something like that, it can really build confidence and I think it helped them a lot last night. There is no way the Os would have been capable of either of the comebacks the Mets just pulled off, but it was really outstanding to watch.  Having guys like Lindor and Alonso really helps!  Philly is going to have their hands full with these Mets.
    • What would O’Hearn get if he does become a free agent?  He doesn’t hit for ton of power, decent runner but not lot of speed, average hitter with average on base percentage that doesn’t play defense well and mostly a platoon DH type guy. Could you decline option and get him for less or is he at market value at 8 milliin.  
    • I think at his age he's going to be what he's going to be velocity wise. Some guys are just going to be slim. He's not going to suddenly gains 15 pounds of muscle.
    • It’s very funny that you mentioned Brandon Lowe, because I was looking around for guys who appeared to be “clutch” hitters, in the context of hitting with men on base or in scoring position. And he was one who stood out on that basis as potentially being Actually Clutch 😂 He has a career 144 wRC+ in (regular season) high leverage situations (234 PAs), 141 wRC+ with men on base (1071 PAs), and 146 wRC+ with men in scoring position (626 PAs). All of which far outstrip his overall career number of 126 wRC+. Sort of shocking to see a guy who has been one of the best at coming through in the biggest (regular season) moments also have such a terrible postseason track record. He did hit 3 dingers in the World Series, but yeah…the stats are absolutely grim from pretty much every other postseason series. I guess it sort of does speak to the point that clutch is more of a mindset than it is an innate trait. The “playoff slump” is clearly in his head at this point, which has continued a pretty vicious cycle — but it’s not like he’s a guy who just buckles any time there’s any pressure at all. 
    • Say it louder from the back! So many people for some reason poo-poo on Povich when I thought he held his own quite well in his debut. Of course he's got some improving to do, but we've seen him throw the ball very well.  Just to add to your first 16 starts list: Kremer - 6.59 ERA, 5.50 FIP, 1.58 WHIP, 8.9 SO/9, 1.8 HR/9, 4.7 BB/9. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...