Jump to content

The Sacramento A's


WillyM

Recommended Posts

The A's intend to leave Oakland after this season, intending eventually to wind up in Las Vegas.  But since Vegas's stadium will not be ready next year, I understand the A's will play their home games in Sacramento.

Sacramento will thus become the fourth home of the A's franchise, following Philadelphia, Kansas City, and Oakland.

Interesting to note that Sacramento is currently home to an NBA franchise, the Kings - and it is also the fourth home of that NBA team, following Rochester, Cincinnati, and Kansas City/Omaha (assuming KC/O can be counted as one "home," which I hope is only a slight stretch).

Can anyone think of any other city which has played home to the fourth incarnation of two different franchises?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Sad.  It's a team with a really good, rich history.  If you were a kid in the late 80s and early 90s, Canseco, McGwire and Henderson were so much fun.  

 

The A's were the biggest franchise in the late 80s and early 90s. The Yankees were a dysfunctional mess and a second rate team until their mid-90's resurgence. The A's filled the void as the team the people most loved and loved to hate.

I don't care what anyone says the Bash Brothers were cool.

il_680x540.2707138448_f8po.jpg

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2024 at 1:59 PM, WillyM said:

The A's intend to leave Oakland after this season, intending eventually to wind up in Las Vegas.  But since Vegas's stadium will not be ready next year, I understand the A's will play their home games in Sacramento.

Sacramento will thus become the fourth home of the A's franchise, following Philadelphia, Kansas City, and Oakland.

Interesting to note that Sacramento is currently home to an NBA franchise, the Kings - and it is also the fourth home of that NBA team, following Rochester, Cincinnati, and Kansas City/Omaha (assuming KC/O can be counted as one "home," which I hope is only a slight stretch).

Can anyone think of any other city which has played home to the fourth incarnation of two different franchises?

Well the NFL Rams franchise deserves some mention as they started in Cleveland in 1937, moved to LA in 1946, moved to St. Louis in 1995 and back to LA in 2016.  Fascinating that in each stop they have won a season’s ultimate prize (either NFL championship or Super Bowl)!

To add some extra spice to the Rams franchise history they were involved with the Baltimore Colts in what was the largest trade of all time as described here.

https://www.nfl.com/news/sidelines/digging-into-the-colts-and-rams-1972-franchise-swap-was-the-greatest-biggest-tra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O’s will play MLB games in a MiLB ballpark next year.  For those who are thinking “road trip!”, consider this about Sacramento.  While announcers were raving about the weather in Oakland this past weekend, in Sacramento July 5, 6 & 7 daily highs were 108, 110 & 106.  I would imagine day games will be limited.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The A's were the biggest franchise in the late 80s and early 90s. The Yankees were a dysfunctional mess and a second rate team until their mid-90's resurgence. The A's filled the void as the team the people most loved and loved to hate.

I don't care what anyone says the Bash Brothers were cool.

il_680x540.2707138448_f8po.jpg

The 1988-90 A’s are pretty comparable to the 1969-71 O’s.  Both teams went to the WS three straight years but only won the middle year of the three.  And like those Orioles teams, I’d say that the A’s lost to two inferior NL opponents (the Dodgers in 1988 and the Reds in 1990).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/7/2024 at 9:35 AM, Moose Milligan said:

Sad.  It's a team with a really good, rich history.  If you were a kid in the late 80s and early 90s, Canseco, McGwire and Henderson were so much fun.  

 

Oh, you kids.  They got nothin on the 72-74 A’s who won 3 WS in a row.   Reggie, Joe Rudi, Sal Bando, Catfish Hunter, Vida Blue, and Rollie Fingers.

I hated them because they beat us in the playoffs in both 73 and 74.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/9/2024 at 10:43 AM, RZNJ said:

Oh, you kids.  They got nothin on the 72-74 A’s who won 3 WS in a row.   Reggie, Joe Rudi, Sal Bando, Catfish Hunter, Vida Blue, and Rollie Fingers.

I hated them because they beat us in the playoffs in both 73 and 74.

 

Not to mention Ken Holtzman, Bill North, Gene Tenace, and Bert Campaneris.  Very good team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Number5 said:

Not to mention Ken Holtzman, Bill North, Gene Tenace, and Bert Campaneris.  Very good team.

But were they as good as the ‘69-71 Orioles teams that only won 1 of 3 World Series?  Not even close, in my book.  They just played very well in October.   And Fingers was huge for them in the WS they won.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'll be honest, the playoffs didn't put me in a happy mood and reading this board has only made it worse.  The amount of people, many well respected, with over the top, outrageous takes calling guys "losers" and "chokers" etc. is ridiculous imo.  This reads more like a football board than a baseball board, and that's not a compliment. I'm kind of at a loss for what they should do to be honest.  The 2nd half drop-off imo is mostly explained by the injuries, particularly on the mound, and Adley's inexplicable performance.  If they were to run the team back with some minimal upgrades to the rotation and pen, sans Burnes and Santander, I think that's a team that could/should win 95ish games and compete for the division.  But there's downside there too.  And if you get Adley of the 2nd half, then you might be looking more at 85ish wins and missing the playoffs. However, I see a lot of schizophrenic and illogical takes on the board.  A lot of people are calling for a "veteran hitter" for the lineup; many of those same people are all too happy to let Santander walk.  Some are calling to not just "hand jobs to young guys;" many of these people were the loudest in demanding more aggressive promoting of prospects. I'm just generally down on the tenor of the board, and personally, I don't have any crazy strong feelings about what I think the O's should or should not do, which is fairly unusual for me.
    • The Phillies are profitable.  The Mets and the Padres are the only two teams that have really done aggressive “deficit-spending” in pursuit of a ring in the last few years.
    • If someone pays Burnes 400 mil or anything close. I think there are owners out there that haven't learned anything and have more money that brains. Don't get me wrong - Burnes is a good pitcher but that's it he is a good pitcher that will turn 30 next year. I believe the calculus for paying 30ish starting pitchers of value is changing. I believe - regardless of Boras - shorter terms and higher average annuals will be in play. So to me, 4/120 isn't a stupid prediction. Guess we shall see. 
    • There is NOTHING preventing the Orioles of signing any player to a serious contract. Especially considering we have signed ZERO since Chris Davis way back in what 2015? That was almost a decade ago. We have been operating in a non-serious manner for too long when it comes to the org’s on field investment.  Teams that don’t spend don’t win World Series. Look at the last 20 years of the game. The Astros first World Series is the only team who wasn’t too half of the league who won a championship.
    • Some owners spend and want to win (Mets, Padres, Phillies). Some are more interested in making money (Rays, Guardians, etc). If Rubenstein is a profits based owner (has to make money year after year like JA) vs an investment style o lever (accepts some years May come with a loss or small net gain) then we (the fans) will be screwed. We will be akin to the Rays who are content with being “good”. But they are never willing to do what it takes to be good enough. I hope Rubenstein and everyone associated with the business or the Orioles paid a lot of attention to all of the empty seats for playoff games. That is evidence of a fanbase/market place who is not fully engaged.  The onus is on the Orioles to give people a compelling reason to come out and spend money especially in this economy. And it cannot just be hey look we have a winning team. The franchise must do more including investing in the on field product (in terms of committed dollars like every other serious franchise who is trying to win a championship).
    • My recollection is that MLB has rules about how much debt teams are allowed to take on and how much money owners are allowed to infuse into their franchises.   They supposedly won't approve contracts if they think a contract will cause them to exceed these thresholds.
    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...