Jump to content

Trade Proposal: Fedde & Kopech for Norby & Beavers


Roll Tide

Would you do this deal?  

58 members have voted

  1. 1. Trade Proposal Menrioned in opening post

    • Yes
    • No
    • If they’d swop Brebbia for Kopech
    • Add Brebbia for a couple young DSL guys with upside


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, HowAboutThat said:

As I study Fedde on the various pages, I’m liking him more and more. His Savant page is far better than Kremer’s, so he’d be our #3, most likely. He’s got a good walk rate, an excellent GB rate, he doesn’t give up a lot of hard contact. He doesn’t K a lot, but who cares?

What am I missing in your reluctance to get him?

IMG_1748.jpeg

IMG_1749.jpeg

It’s kind of unfair to Kremer to knock him down while he’s got a good body of work over parts of 5 seasons versus Fedde and his career body of work. I like Fedde. I think he found something in Korea, but Fedde finding something doesn’t diminish Kremer.

See Fedde in 2022. 

IMG_5668.jpeg

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Of course not ….I suggested this 

 

Crochet and Robert 

For 

Basallo, Bradfield , McDermott, Bright, and Stowers.

 

And they said we’d be lucky to get Crochet for that 😂

 

They think Robert is a star despite his low batting average and injury history.

 

They think Crochet is worth more than Cease. 

Good , they can keep him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Of course not ….I suggested this 

 

Crochet and Robert 

For 

Basallo, Bradfield , McDermott, Bright, and Stowers.

 

And they said we’d be lucky to get Crochet for that 😂

 

They think Robert is a star despite his low batting average and injury history.

 

They think Crochet is worth more than Cease. 

An average player is going to look like a star on that team. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Of course not ….I suggested this 

 

Crochet and Robert 

For 

Basallo, Bradfield , McDermott, Bright, and Stowers.

 

And they said we’d be lucky to get Crochet for that 😂

 

They think Robert is a star despite his low batting average and injury history.

 

They think Crochet is worth more than Cease. 

I mean, it’s a really bad proposal for both Crochet & Robert.

And yes, I think the guy who put up 4.9 fWAR last year is a star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HowAboutThat said:

A 3+ FIP isn’t bad, Fedde’s Whip is arguably a more important stat, and 1.1 WHIP is better than league average. His .269 BABIP is worse than league average, so the defense has hurt him a little.He’s had 18 starts for 106 innings or a hair under 6 innings per start, so he won’t wear out the pen. I think he’s a splendid pickup, but would cost more than a prospect in the teens, even with our deep farm.

I think you have the BABIP point backwards.  League average BABIP is .288, so Fedde’s .269 suggests he’s had some combination of good defense or good luck.  Also, per Statcast his 3.13 ERA is better than his xERA of 3.57.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fedde is a hard guy to peg.    Kudos to him for making what looks like a great choice for his Age 30 year.

It feels a little dicey to me if the first half success (never mind Year 2) can stick as the league digests the changes in his game.

Elias will get to see a couple more starts of his back rotation guys figuring how the Floor v. Upside balance he buys.

I think of Chris Flexen some when I think of him as an Asia guy who had time constrained success coming back to the USA with a new set of skills.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kopech is interesting. As for Fedde? The days of 4.50 ERA and up should be over for the O's. Being this is out of the norm, and not the AL East.. Fedde is not worth it to me.

I'd rather bring up a young guy and work with him than wait for the sky to fall. Maybe Dan D can find a spot for him somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, but which pitchers do you guys like who will actually be available?  Last I checked Crochet was #1 in fWAR and Fedde was #15 (neck & neck with Burnes) and yet half this board wants nothing to with either of them.  Interested in who these high end pitchers are who have question marks and will come at reasonable prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Just out of curiosity, but which pitchers do you guys like who will actually be available?  Last I checked Crochet was #1 in fWAR and Fedde was #15 (neck & neck with Burnes) and yet half this board wants nothing to with either of them.  Interested in who these high end pitchers are who have question marks and will come at reasonable prices.

Fedde and Crochet cause hesitation due to one season of prime performance and injuries for Crochet. I think we should get whomever we can get a fair deal on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I mean, it’s a really bad proposal for both Crochet & Robert.

And yes, I think the guy who put up 4.9 fWAR last year is a star.

Crochet has injury concerns…can’t pitch 80-100 innings in a playoff run. But you know that and would be saying it or the White Sox were the team buying.

Robert was good last year , but injured and got out of the gate poorly. 
 

You think it’s a bad deal because you’re a Sox fan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Just out of curiosity, but which pitchers do you guys like who will actually be available?  Last I checked Crochet was #1 in fWAR and Fedde was #15 (neck & neck with Burnes) and yet half this board wants nothing to with either of them.  Interested in who these high end pitchers are who have question marks and will come at reasonable prices.

I think most people are interested in Crochet, the risk is he won't help this year and most people here think we can get him for scraps when it's going to cost guys that most people here wouldn't trade. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s kind of unfair to Kremer to knock him down while he’s got a good body of work over parts of 5 seasons versus Fedde and his career body of work. I like Fedde. I think he found something in Korea, but Fedde finding something doesn’t diminish Kremer.

See Fedde in 2022. 

IMG_5668.jpeg

I wasn’t knocking Kremer. To say that B is better doesn’t mean that A is bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think you have the BABIP point backwards.  League average BABIP is .288, so Fedde’s .269 suggests he’s had some combination of good defense or good luck.  Also, per Statcast his 3.13 ERA is better than his xERA of 3.57.   

Fair point, I did get it backwards. But the main point, that Fedde would be a meaningful improvement, remains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Just out of curiosity, but which pitchers do you guys like who will actually be available?  Last I checked Crochet was #1 in fWAR and Fedde was #15 (neck & neck with Burnes) and yet half this board wants nothing to with either of them.  Interested in who these high end pitchers are who have question marks and will come at reasonable prices.

Oh boy.

First of all, you know the issues with crochet and none of them have anything to do with talent.  Don’t be naive and act like you don’t get that.

Fedde has been nothing until this year. Is it a first half mirage or more than that? We don’t know. Maybe the sweeper he picked up in the KBO is a true game changer and will change him long term or maybe people just haven’t seen him and they will adjust and his lack of missed bats and Ks will start to catch up to him.

Fedde can be an option but he should be way down the list imo. If other options aren’t there, Fedde can be revisited. Until then, he should be on the back burner and if we lose him because of that, so be it..no real loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...