Jump to content

Oakland 7/7


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, O's84 said:

How is that not a strike?

They want us to lose so the Yankees are happy on SNB and they can say they are in first place even though we would still hold a lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, justD said:

Not sure what you all are seeing, but scoring a bunch and then going to sleep offensively is pretty much how this team has played all season. Maybe it’s just more apparent recently because we feel our bullpen is more vulnerable so it means more?

Bemoaning the team’s play when we’re in the lead and have a strong starter on the mound is what has gotten posters shredded in the game threads this season, but that’s a common theme in today’s game with consensus approval of such sentiment?

Call me confused. 

Especially confusing when the complaints began early in the game after we’d already scored 5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, justD said:

Especially confusing when the complaints began early in the game after we’d already scored 5. 

For sure. I mean, I don't like some of the stuff we've done, but what has it cost us in this game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cano and Webb both do their jobs very well.   Gunnar and the ump prevented them from being perfect.

Now let's get an insurance run or two to make Kimbrel's job a bit easier!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, justD said:

Not sure what you all are seeing, but scoring a bunch and then going to sleep offensively is pretty much how this team has played all season. Maybe it’s just more apparent recently because we feel our bullpen is more vulnerable so it means more?

Bemoaning the team’s play when we’re in the lead and have a strong starter on the mound is what has gotten posters shredded in the game threads this season, but that’s a common theme in today’s game with consensus approval of such sentiment?

Call me confused. 

It would be nice to see a few 1-run innings in a game after a big inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...