Jump to content

Trading for Tarik Skubal


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Then the O’s should hang up the phone. Simple. 

This is narrow thinking. With the current roster construction both JH and HK are less of a priority than a TOR starter. Does Skubal come with some concern? Of course, every pitcher is one throw away from catastrophy but the O's are in a legitimate World Series window and this year could very well be their best chance with Burnes anchoring the staff. Add Skubal to a three-headed playoff rotation with GrayRod and Burnes and they likely have the best starting options of any playoff team this year.

HK is a fine prospect. He was a top 40 guy coming into this year but the truth is, he's had moments with this 24' team but he's not moved the needle. Could he? Sure. As much as a legit TOR starter could? No.

Everyone wants to focus on "you're judging JH off of 34 ABs bla bla bla".. no I'm not. I've been extremely vocal about my feelings on him as a player and believe that he can be a legitimate star in the league but he's not going to move Gunnar off of SS and as much as people want to attach themselves to his OAA this year in limited games (which, I refuse to buy into) his defensive profile is below that of JW and several other prospects in their system. That is a fact.

I'll post it again..it may come down to between JH and Mayo and who they feel they can most afford to move. To me, it's JH. I've seen them both play a considerable amount and while everyone glosses over Mayo's size and assume that he can't play a ML 3B, cite some of this throwing errors, he is actually extremely mobile and athletic, not just for a kid 6'5. The question with him at Third is the same question evaluators had about Gunnar at SS - can he improve his consistency? I think that he can and I think that Jordan Westburg profiles better as a 2B for the O's for the next five years than he does as a 3B.

Mayo and Skubal are more valuable to the 2024 Orioles (and 25 and 26 teams) than JH and HK.

I'm not moving JH for anything less than a controllable (this year plus at least two more years) TOR arm. Skubal comes with baggage and I don't even love him as a pitcher. I've stated that numerous times. But I make this deal, especially if a major league reliever is coming back in it. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, winston24 said:

I don't see Elias trading Holliday, Mayo, or Basallo.  Along with the rest of the core (Gunnar, Adler, Kjerstad, Westburg, Cowser, etc) they form Orioles success the next 7 years or so.

 

The trade pieces are pretty much anyone else in the minors and several guys on the big league roster.  Also, don't rule out Burnes coming back.  Rubinstein will spend.

It's a huge assumption that all of Mayo, Basallo, Kjerstad and JH are all going to perform well enough to be part of a core. The O's have a high success rate on top prospects now but eventually someone is not going to pan out as we hope.

They aren't trading any of those guys for unproven players. They're trading them only for proven commodities who increase their chances of winning the World Series for the next several years, starting with this year's team while they have Burnes under contract. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, banks703 said:

It's a huge assumption that all of Mayo, Basallo, Kjerstad and JH are all going to perform well enough to be part of a core. The O's have a high success rate on top prospects now but eventually someone is not going to pan out as we hope.

They aren't trading any of those guys for unproven players. They're trading them only for proven commodities who increase their chances of winning the World Series for the next several years, starting with this year's team while they have Burnes under contract. 

This is a fair point, and taking a moment to appreciate the good work already done, some of the high hopes are because Gunnar and Westburg have been so wildly successful.    Adley's just Adley.

Haskin does look like a ~$2M bust, and all teams have busts, often even more expensive than that, but Elias really hasn't yet.    It is inevitable he will, whether it ends up being EBJ or Honeycutt or even still one of Kjerstad or Cowser.

But Mayo and Holliday and Basallo are all pretty close to being the world's greatest hitters of their age, and that isn't something I feel great about letting go of even for Skubal, a $350k arm.     Some of what he's achieved has been with increased oomph despite the surgeon already having some of his talent.

I do believe Holliday's 2024 struggles are in part because he was trying to rush getting to his man power.    He's seen how Orioles player development required line drive hitters like Norby and Cowser to alter their games.     Anthony Volpe's 2023-2024 of "year 1 swing for the fences, year 2 oh wait maybe don't do that" is I think a famous example of a process many of the world's best young hitters are iterating through figuring out how to optimize their games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And some are bigger risks than others.  Trading one of those guys only to have Skubal miss 18 months would be devastating.

There is always risk in trading. The better the player a team wants, the more risk they have to incur. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

There is always risk in trading. The better the player a team wants, the more risk they have to incur. 

No doubt but I think adding a mid guy, a few excellent high leverage relievers and keeping our best players is the better way to go.

Out hit them, shut down after 6 innings and lean on Burnes and GRod.  That would be my play.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

This is a fair point, and taking a moment to appreciate the good work already done, some of the high hopes are because Gunnar and Westburg have been so wildly successful.    Adley's just Adley.

Haskin does look like a ~$2M bust, and all teams have busts, often even more expensive than that, but Elias really hasn't yet.    It is inevitable he will, whether it ends up being EBJ or Honeycutt or even still one of Kjerstad or Cowser.

But Mayo and Holliday and Basallo are all pretty close to being the world's greatest hitters of their age, and that isn't something I feel great about letting go of even for Skubal, a $350k arm.     Some of what he's achieved has been with increased oomph despite the surgeon already having some of his talent.

I do believe Holliday's 2024 struggles are in part because he was trying to rush getting to his man power.    He's seen how Orioles player development required line drive hitters like Norby and Cowser to alter their games.     Anthony Volpe's 2023-2024 of "year 1 swing for the fences, year 2 oh wait maybe don't do that" is I think a famous example of a process many of the world's best young hitters are iterating through figuring out how to optimize their games.

I can't disagree with any of this and I point out in my posts that I don't love the idea of moving JH but that of the big three, I think he is the most expendable of the bunch. I also note that I don't love Skubal and while I would make the deals that I suggested in earlier posts, I would hope Elias is working his ass off to have other options. As @Tony-OH stated in another post, I would begrudgingly do it. That doesn't mean that I would give away potential superstardom.

In professional sports, next year is so difficult to project. So many things can happen which is why I concede that making a deal to land a legitimate TOR guy, who is controllable beyond this year, is worth the prospect capital that it would require. I think folks on here believe that I am anti-Jackson Holliday. I'm not. LOL. If he is with the organization throughout his entire career I'll be ecstatic and root for him just like every other player but I am also not going to romanticize and forget the fact that baseball is a business, there are a lot of factors that go into running a successful franchise and that player dynamics and talent are only a few of what is required to be good. Gunnar isn't going anywhere. He is the face of the franchise. Adley is the second least likely to be moved. Everyone else beyond that is 2nd tier right now. Could that change? Of course but in the last 25 years, how often have the Orioles had a legitimate, bonafide ACE of their staff who could carry them in the post-season? Never.

Burnes is that good and could pitch them to a World Series this year. GrayRod is a fantastic second or third guy in a playoff rotation with soooo much room to further improve. If the O's are going to compete for a championship, this year may be their best year to do so because of Burnes but they need another guy to slot at the top with him and GrayRod and if moving a JH (or a Mayo or Basallo, etc.) means improving their WS odds by 10% or 15%.. I take that chance but hey, my risk tolerance is higher than most. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No doubt but I think adding a mid guy, a few excellent high leverage relievers and keeping our best players is the better way to go.

Out hit them, shut down after 6 innings and lean on Burnes and GRod.  That would be my play.

I'm not saying it's not a valid way to go, but are you saying that you are ok with not acquiring an impact arm at the trading deadline? You are fine with rolling what they got? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No doubt but I think adding a mid guy, a few excellent high leverage relievers and keeping our best players is the better way to go.

Out hit them, shut down after 6 innings and lean on Burnes and GRod.  That would be my play.

I'm confused. In earlier posts you said it's a waste of resources acquiring anyone who wouldn't be a playoff difference maker, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, banks703 said:

I can't disagree with any of this and I point out in my posts that I don't love the idea of moving JH but that of the big three, I think he is the most expendable of the bunch. I also note that I don't love Skubal and while I would make the deals that I suggested in earlier posts, I would hope Elias is working his ass off to have other options. As @Tony-OH stated in another post, I would begrudgingly do it. That doesn't mean that I would give away potential superstardom.

In professional sports, next year is so difficult to project. So many things can happen which is why I concede that making a deal to land a legitimate TOR guy, who is controllable beyond this year, is worth the prospect capital that it would require. I think folks on here believe that I am anti-Jackson Holliday. I'm not. LOL. If he is with the organization throughout his entire career I'll be ecstatic and root for him just like every other player but I am also not going to romanticize and forget the fact that baseball is a business, there are a lot of factors that go into running a successful franchise and that player dynamics and talent are only a few of what is required to be good. Gunnar isn't going anywhere. He is the face of the franchise. Adley is the second least likely to be moved. Everyone else beyond that is 2nd tier right now. Could that change? Of course but in the last 25 years, how often have the Orioles had a legitimate, bonafide ACE of their staff who could carry them in the post-season? Never.

Burnes is that good and could pitch them to a World Series this year. GrayRod is a fantastic second or third guy in a playoff rotation with soooo much room to further improve. If the O's are going to compete for a championship, this year may be their best year to do so because of Burnes but they need another guy to slot at the top with him and GrayRod and if moving a JH (or a Mayo or Basallo, etc.) means improving their WS odds by 10% or 15%.. I take that chance but hey, my risk tolerance is higher than most. 

A 70/60/60 power, hit, run tool is not the most expendable to me. He is someone capable of playing middle INF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

A 70/60/60 power, hit, run tool is not the most expendable to me. He is someone capable of playing middle INF. 

I have doubts that he will realize that 60 power projection but the hit tool is certainly elite. I'm not taking anything away from that. 

He's not going to be a good major league SS. If he sticks in the INF it's 2B where the bat certainly plays up quite a bit but the defense is still not going to be elite. I still don't rule out a move to the Outfield. If he could be Jackson Merrill out there, I think we all would be fine with a move to CF and I personally believe that Holliday is the better overall athlete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

This is a fair point, and taking a moment to appreciate the good work already done, some of the high hopes are because Gunnar and Westburg have been so wildly successful.    Adley's just Adley.

Haskin does look like a ~$2M bust, and all teams have busts, often even more expensive than that, but Elias really hasn't yet.    It is inevitable he will, whether it ends up being EBJ or Honeycutt or even still one of Kjerstad or Cowser.

But Mayo and Holliday and Basallo are all pretty close to being the world's greatest hitters of their age, and that isn't something I feel great about letting go of even for Skubal, a $350k arm.     Some of what he's achieved has been with increased oomph despite the surgeon already having some of his talent.

I do believe Holliday's 2024 struggles are in part because he was trying to rush getting to his man power.    He's seen how Orioles player development required line drive hitters like Norby and Cowser to alter their games.     Anthony Volpe's 2023-2024 of "year 1 swing for the fences, year 2 oh wait maybe don't do that" is I think a famous example of a process many of the world's best young hitters are iterating through figuring out how to optimize their games.

Mayo has a long way to go to be a better hitter than Gunnar (who is the same age). What Mayo is doing at AAA is extremely impressive. But Gunnar is doing it at the hugest level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, dzorange said:

MLB Network joining in on the fun: 

https://www.instagram.com/p/C9x14QsAZad/?igsh=MXJmc3E3ZTlnY3U0NA==

 

 

I would probably make this trade all day. Altho it might hurt our ability to get relievers. You'd need to keep Stowers for depth almost certainly with Kjerstad gone. 

Maybe you could get a reliever for Mounty and bring up Mayo. 

I also am always surprised by these theoretical deals for pitching that don't include any pitching in return. Can't see the Tigers not demanding a pitching prospect in there.

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Of course. You don’t need data to know this although the data just supports the obvious. This has been an issue a lot this year, whether it be for individual players or the team. When you are struggling this bad, bad luck is always involved.  Just as when you are tearing things up, good luck is always involved.
    • Needless to say, our offense hasn’t scored a lot of runs lately.   But how much is bad hitting, and how much is bad luck?  A friend of mine sent me this: “I compiled the high xBA at bats that turned into outs and low xBA at bats that turned into hits for the Orioles and their competition for the 3 Boston games and 3 Detroit games. “The results: High xBA outs (defined as xBA above .300) Orioles / Opponent 9/15: 6 / 2 9/14: 9 / 3 9/13: 2 / 6 9/11: 7 / 3 9/10: 2 / 2 9/9: 4 / 2 Total: 30 / 18 Low xBA hits (defined as xBA below .250) Orioles / Opponent 9/15: 0 / 0 9/14: 0 / 0 9/13: 0 / 1 9/11: 3 / 1 9/10: 1 / 2 9/9: 0 / 6 Total: 4 / 10” To add to the above, in those six games, Orioles’ batters struck out 50 times, while their opponents struck out 61 times.   So, the Orioles made a lot more contact than their opponents, but a lot of their well-hit balls turned into outs, while their opponents were rather fortunate with poorly hit balls turning into hits.    Obviously, this data isn’t the whole story, and it’s only covering the last road trip, not the last 5 weeks or so that the offense has been struggling.   But it does suggest that bad luck has played a role in our hitting woes over the last week.   
    • Hyde was saying before the deadline, right after the Marlins series, that the hitting had been struggling, and asked the press if they thought the answer was to get younger?  At the time Holliday and Mayo weren’t up. I believe Norby was the temp injury fill in for Mateo.  Being forced to play Holliday/Mayo in ride or die situations this year has really killed us.  A couple of things… 1.  It’s tough to break in a lot of rookies/2nd year players all at once.  2. Hindsight 20/20, the rash of pitching injuries forced Elias to buy a 2nd SP and we should’ve kept Norby as insurance. Hindsight 20/20, Holliday was the #1 overall prospect and in AAA. Mayo was having the best AAA season offensively anyone could’ve dreamed of.  Overall, offensively we’re just a year or two away.  Long story short… our young hitters need experience that only time will bring. 
    • Kjerstad hasn't played in 60 days and is still the teams best hitter since July 12th.till the teams best hitter since July 12th.
    • Does anyone really want to see a Royals - Orioles rematch in the Playoffs...  Boy, I still have PTSD from a decade ago. smh
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...