Jump to content

ALWC Game 1 Attendance


DrinkinWithFermi

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I don’t get the defeatist attitude myself. This is a new organization than the past.  
 

The play down the stretch was hard to watch. That said it’s a quality franchise now. 

Logically you are 100% correct.  But 9 straight playoff losses does a thing to a fella.

BTW, in those 9 playoff losses, the Orioles have held a lead for a total of 5 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Logically you are 100% correct.  But 9 straight playoff losses does a thing to a fella.

BTW, in those 9 playoff losses, the Orioles have held a lead for a total of 5 innings.

This lineup is deeper than 14-16. Those 5 losses were from all or nothing type teams. 
 

Yes…. People can make the same claims about this team but they are better. Until they show it people will criticize and question which is fine. The one game they hit last year they didn’t pitch. The narrative won’t change until it changes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of people are feeling the pinch of inflation. I got my truck registration last week and it nearly doubled. I am going to today’s game but I thought l long and hard about it. The weather and work/school schedules I’m sure were factors too.  
As far as the team goes…sure it’s frustrating to see a team as talented as this floundering but in the grand scheme of things it’s just a game and not life or death so I’m going just hoping for a competitive game that turns out in our favor. 
Go O’s 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, eddie83 said:

This lineup is deeper than 14-16. Those 5 losses were from all or nothing type teams. 
 

Yes…. People can make the same claims about this team but they are better. Until they show it people will criticize and question which is fine. The one game they hit last year they didn’t pitch. The narrative won’t change until it changes.  

I feel like this lineup compares to 2016 in the sense that it's a home run or nothing. Otherwise, yes it's a different organization and we have a chance to be a playoff team for the better part of a decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Surhoffan17 said:

I feel like this lineup compares to 2016 in the sense that it's a home run or nothing. Otherwise, yes it's a different organization and we have a chance to be a playoff team for the better part of a decade. 

That team was              2024

7th RS                           2nd

9 BA                              3

5 K’s                             8

2 SLG                          1

101 OPS+                    118

 

Imagine that team playing in this park now? I know how bad they looked yesterday. Not denying that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

That team was              2024

7th RS                           2nd

9 BA                              3

5 K’s                             8

2 SLG                          1

101 OPS+                    118

 

Imagine that team playing in this park now? I know how bad they looked yesterday. Not denying that. 

Wow! I guess it just seems that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

That was pretty embarrassing.

Empty seats everywhere.

LF upper deck almost empty.

For a GD playoff game.

:puke:

I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such.

But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline.

I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase.

You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org.

Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen.

Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested?

This is much ado about absolutely nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eddie83 said:

I don’t get the defeatist attitude myself. This is a new organization than the past.  
 

The play down the stretch was hard to watch. That said it’s a quality franchise now. 

IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect.

Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways.

If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bemorewins said:

IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect.

Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways.

If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".

The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money. 

Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it. 
 

They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...