Jump to content

12 Questions for the Offseason


Warehouse

Recommended Posts

On 10/4/2024 at 11:18 AM, Warehouse said:

On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat.

In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo.

My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.

Watching the last two post-seasons it is clear that our opponents are going to trot out as many LHP as they can against us. And if Hyde's best option in the sixth inning of a playoff game is to PH Slater for O'Hearn then we are in trouble. Even if Cowser, Holliday, Kjerstad become good agains't lefty specialists, it will likely take a couple of years to get to that point. And not that we would pay the money, but NO, guys like Konerko are not signing because of Walltimore...and who can blame them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My key questions are 

 

-How do you replace Burnes? And by replacing him I’m not saying they will add someone as good. 
 

-What RH OF do they add?

-How and where does Mayo fit in?

-Do you keep O’Hearn?

 

 

If for sake of conversation say Santander leaves and O’Hearn stays 

Adley 

(C)

Mounty

O’Hearn

(Mayo)

Holliday

Mateo

Westy

Cowser

Mullins

Kjerstad 

(RH OF)

(????)

 

Do you keep Urias as solid depth or go in another direction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, gamiliel said:

Watching the last two post-seasons it is clear that our opponents are going to trot out as many LHP as they can against us. And if Hyde's best option in the sixth inning of a playoff game is to PH Slater for O'Hearn then we are in trouble. Even if Cowser, Holliday, Kjerstad become good agains't lefty specialists, it will likely take a couple of years to get to that point. And not that we would pay the money, but NO, guys like Konerko are not signing because of Walltimore...and who can blame them?

Someone brought up Ward from Angels as a trade opportunity. I do think RH is the most important piece to add to the hitters this winter. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Baltimore and DC surrounding population around 9 million. NYC around 24 million.
    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...