Jump to content

Unbelievable... 0% Graduation rate '97-'00


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

What do you guys care about...That Dixon and Blake won a NC and went to another final 4 or that they didn't graduate?

In other words, who cares....You can't make these kids make the right decisions.

Well for me, it is a biased opinion because I know Juan. I know he has plans to graduate, he is only a semester away I believe.

He also gives a ton of Money to the school and to Calvert Hall. I don't mind the fact that he didn't graduate because I know it is in his plans. He set up a scholarship fund in his brothers name and I believe it is for people who are in the law enforcement type majors at MD since his bro is a city cop I believe.

It is disappointing that they didn't receive the diploma, but they are not far away to be sure.

If anything, Juan is a great ambassador for MD and for Calvert Hall, so I don't really mind the fact he didn't graduate right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Two things. Why can't you root for success on the court and in the classroom? Why is it an either/or? And I'd dare say that, for instance, Blake and Dixon made the right decisions. Those guys have insane money now and are set for life. In this case, they've taken care of their families and allowed themselves to live a comfortable, stable life. That's the American dream, right? Besides being flawed, this graduation rate would be a lot more worrisome if you were talking about a MEAC or Sunbelt or Trans-Atlantic Conference or whatever type of school, where so few players make it to the pro level.

Its not either/or John but at the end of the day, these guys graduating or not doesn't impact you.

Whether these guys go out and end up in the NBA or working at T Rowe Price, it has no impact for you.

Now, when they play for MD, their impact is felt by you because you are a fan of the team, go to the game and invest time into watching them.

I guess at the end of the day, in a roundabout way i am trying to defend Gary Williams here.

People are going to point the finger at him....I don't think that is fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not either/or John but at the end of the day, these guys graduating or not doesn't impact you.

Whether these guys go out and end up in the NBA or working at T Rowe Price, it has no impact for you.

Now, when they play for MD, their impact is felt by you because you are a fan of the team, go to the game and invest time into watching them.

I guess at the end of the day, in a roundabout way i am trying to defend Gary Williams here.

People are going to point the finger at him....I don't think that is fair.

Unless Gary Williams has a different job description than other college coaches his job is to graduate players and win. The coach isn't soley responsible but he is a huge factor and when it comes to the program the buck stops there. That said, they seem to have improved a lot recently so in the grand scheme of things what happened in the past is not a huge deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not either/or John but at the end of the day, these guys graduating or not doesn't impact you.

Whether these guys go out and end up in the NBA or working at T Rowe Price, it has no impact for you.

Now, when they play for MD, their impact is felt by you because you are a fan of the team, go to the game and invest time into watching them.

I guess at the end of the day, in a roundabout way i am trying to defend Gary Williams here.

People are going to point the finger at him....I don't think that is fair.

I agree that preparing for a career is the true goal of college. Some people need a degree to do that, some people don't. Most basketball players don't. If anyone on this list has a job in basketball, then I wouldn't be too concerned with them not graduating.

To address your other point, I definitely do care what happens to these guys after they are gone. These are guys I grew up rooting for and idolizing (some of them). It breaks my heart when Lonny Baxter gets multiple gun violations and ends up in a DC prison after being my favorite player for 4 years and seeming like an all-around teddy bear of a guy. I loved seeing Sarunas come to the NBA after dominating the Europe leagues. I think its cool as hell seeing Matt Hahn coaching. I don't think its only because I want guys from my school to do well, but its because I liked these guys when they were here, and just want to see them do well in general.

Its like seeing a former Oriole or Raven I liked do well with their new team. I'll root against them when they're playing against the team I cheer for, but other than that, I'd like to see them succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Gary Williams has a different job description than other college coaches his job is to graduate players and win. The coach isn't soley responsible but he is a huge factor and when it comes to the program the buck stops there. That said, they seem to have improved a lot recently so in the grand scheme of things what happened in the past is not a huge deal.

Come on....This is like saying student athletes go to school for a degree and the sport second...It just isn't reality.

If Gary graduated 100% of his kids but won 12 games every year, how long do you think he would have his job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on....This is like saying student athletes go to school for a degree and the sport second...It just isn't reality.

How about having student athletes go the school for the sport first and a degree second instead of going to the school for the sport and not for a degree?

If Gary graduated 100% of his kids but won 12 games every year, how long do you think he would have his job?

You do know that it is possible to win *and* graduate players, don't you?

Like I said, things seem to have gotten better so it's not a huge deal that they had a breakdown several years ago. But if Gary had continued to graduate 0% of his players that too would have eventually ended up costing him his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about having student athletes go the school for the sport first and a degree second instead of going to the school for the sport and not for a degree?

I agree this is the way it should be but the reality is that is not the way it is in a lot of places.

You do know that it is possible to win *and* graduate players, don't you?

Sure...Ask Bobby Knight this. But i also know that these guys get their heads filled with misinformation and only want to hear the good stuff.

Like I said, things seem to have gotten better so it's not a huge deal that they had a breakdown several years ago. But if Gary had continued to graduate 0% of his players that too would have eventually ended up costing him his job.
Well, MD has had bad graduation rates since Gary got there(at least according to the recent studies) and he is still there...Put it this way, losing a bunch of games will cost him his job much quicker than bad graduation rates.

He is at that school to win games first and foremost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not either/or John but at the end of the day, these guys graduating or not doesn't impact you.

Whether these guys go out and end up in the NBA or working at T Rowe Price, it has no impact for you.

Now, when they play for MD, their impact is felt by you because you are a fan of the team, go to the game and invest time into watching them.

I guess at the end of the day, in a roundabout way i am trying to defend Gary Williams here.

People are going to point the finger at him....I don't think that is fair.

It doesn't impact me one bit. BUT, it impacts him. He's a college coach, not a pro coach. He is responsible for coaching a basketball team and representing the university. And, there is an implied responsibility for academics in NCAA athletic programs. And, right now, his looks like a joke. How is the fact that it "doesn't impact me" defending him at all? Those kids aren't my responsibility...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree this is the way it should be but the reality is that is not the way it is in a lot of places.

In those places where it is not that way attempts should be made to change things rather than just writing it off as no big deal.

Sure...Ask Bobby Knight this. But i also know that these guys get their heads filled with misinformation and only want to hear the good stuff.

Well, MD has had bad graduation rates since Gary got there(at least according to the recent studies) and he is still there...Put it this way, losing a bunch of games will cost him his job much quicker than bad graduation rates.

He is at that school to win games first and foremost.

Absolutely, winning is a requirement and the most important thing for job security. While he may have a bad overall graduation rate - even if it's in the 30% range he'll be fine as long as he wins. If they hadn't improved and the next study was going to have them at 0% my guess is that he'd have some problems even if they continued to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't impact me one bit. BUT, it impacts him. He's a college coach, not a pro coach. He is responsible for coaching a basketball team and representing the university. And, there is an implied responsibility for academics in NCAA athletic programs. And, right now, his looks like a joke. How is the fact that it "doesn't impact me" defending him at all? Those kids aren't my responsibility...

My point with that is why do you care at all about this?

Someone like Mackus or John, i can understand because it makes THEIR school look bad.

As Beaner said, if you went there, i get that.

I know as a Duke fan, i could care less if they graduate or not. I want them to go to Duke, play well, win games and hopefully win titles.

Once they leave Duke, unless they go into the NBA, i don't follow them. I don't pay attention to their portfolios or if they are digging ditches....I mean sure, i would like to see them do well in life but i would wish that on most human beings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about having student athletes go the school for the sport first and a degree second instead of going to the school for the sport and not for a degree?

You do know that it is possible to win *and* graduate players, don't you?

Like I said, things seem to have gotten better so it's not a huge deal that they had a breakdown several years ago. But if Gary had continued to graduate 0% of his players that too would have eventually ended up costing him his job.

But what value are the athletes actually getting by graduating? If they graduate through grade inflation, BS majors, and/or "advisors" doing homework for them, does that really make them more qualified? It's nice to say they are student/athletes, but for the most part that just isn't the case. They need to have something like an 820 on their SATs combined for the reading and math section. Considering the minimum score is 400, that is just abominably low, and some of these guys struggle to get that and have to take it 10 times, even with private tutoring. And they are going to institutions such as Duke where people get rejected even with 1500+ SATs. The same thing happens at Ivy League schools; everyone knows that if you take classes with lots of athletes, there is a massive curve. For the most part, these kids just aren't on the same level academically, just like the general student population is not on their level athletically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't impact me one bit. BUT, it impacts him. He's a college coach, not a pro coach. He is responsible for coaching a basketball team and representing the university. And, there is an implied responsibility for academics in NCAA athletic programs. And, right now, his looks like a joke. How is the fact that it "doesn't impact me" defending him at all? Those kids aren't my responsibility...

The problem is the use of flawed statistics over the wrong period of time. Kind of like measuring Miguel Tejada's overall defensive abilities based on fielding percentage in August 2007.

Apparently some of the players actually did graduate, and most of the players involved are playing pro ball somewhere. Judging Williams based on those guys is like judging Harvard a failure because Bill Gates dropped out of school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is the use of flawed statistics over the wrong period of time. Kind of like measuring Miguel Tejada's overall defensive abilities based on fielding percentage in August 2007.

Apparently some of the players actually did graduate, and most of the players involved are playing pro ball somewhere. Judging Williams based on those guys is like judging Harvard a failure because Bill Gates dropped out of school.

Sure it's flawed. But, 0% is still bad. Miguel's fielding percentage in August wasn't 0.000. No other teams had 0%, did they? And, I'd be willing to wager that there are quite a few other schools with more players in the NBA and overseas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point with that is why do you care at all about this?

Someone like Mackus or John, i can understand because it makes THEIR school look bad.

As Beaner said, if you went there, i get that.

I know as a Duke fan, i could care less if they graduate or not. I want them to go to Duke, play well, win games and hopefully win titles.

Once they leave Duke, unless they go into the NBA, i don't follow them. I don't pay attention to their portfolios or if they are digging ditches....I mean sure, i would like to see them do well in life but i would wish that on most human beings.

I went there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There are no answers, only Zuul. But seriously, I think the issue at play here is we look at the body of work of guys like Eloy, Slater, O'Hearn, Rivera, and (to a lesser extent) Soto, you see where the holes are. I get that O'Hearn was thrust into 1B near FT due to the Mountcastle injury, but that didn't explain Hyde from playing O'Hearn in the OF when he is one of the worst defensive OFers on this team. Right now, this team is very much ailing. Ramon coming back will definitely help spell the need for O'Hearn to be a 1B by maybe letting Rivera play over there.  We need to get back to a point where O'Hearn is only hitting against righties and is playing sparingly in the field. Eloy is a liability at this point. I was a proponent of seeing what mechanical tweaks they could make similar to what they did w/ Hicks (and even O'Hearn!) and they did catch lightning in a bottle maybe due to excitement/adrenaline and BABIP being unsustainably high, but right now his flyballs aren't carrying and his groundballs aren't finding holes, so there's probably a reason why Chicago is saying, "Haha, told you so!" This team is in freefall offensively, at this point...just give the ABs to Mayo. You can't simultaneously say, "He needs to make adjustments!" and then let him have 5 ABs over 5 games. That isn't a way to grow a player. Not everybody can be a part time player and be effective off the bench/sparingly. Kjerstad has shown an ability to hit lefties in the minors as well as in the majors (albeit in very limited time, he his 4 for 10 against them). Let the kid play. Slater has fallen off a cliff, but at least he's a solid defensive OFer I get it, nobody is going to solve the offensive woes of this team when it comes to the rookies/young guys. Mayo, Holliday, Kjerstad, even Cowser...they're all still adjusting. The change needs to come from the main stays. Now, Adley is starting to hit, Gunnar is back on a hitting binge, but this lineup desperately needs some consistent production from Tony to go along with it because right now way too much pressure is being put on the bottom of the lineup and the young guys. And I'm not convinced Westy solves any of those issues as wrist injuries are a beast to bounceback from quickly.   
    • I get the desire to poo-poo analytics and advanced data, etc.  It does get obnoxious hearing about statcast pages in red when guys aren't hitting well.   But more obnoxious are cries of "the old eye test" and "old school" and the other various "yelling at cloud" types of arguments.  If everyone was stuck with the way things were done back in the day, we'd never progress and never advance in any area of life or society.  That includes how we look at and discuss baseball.
    • If the above is true, how do you get a team to deliver timely hits, stop pressing, and quite expecting to lose?  
    • I'm not sure if I'd go as far to say as Norby is a bad baseball player.   My post was a bit tongue in cheek.  Like, I'm not ready to give up on Trevor Rogers even though admittedly he's been terrible since he got here.  A lot of people were acting like we gave up Steve Finley 2.0 after Norby went on a heater when he arrived in Miami.  It was absolutely silly to think that way, just like it's silly to point to his recent cooldown as a sign of who he is, too. Much like the book hasn't been finished on the player Trevor Rogers will be, the book also hasn't been finished on who Norby will be, either.  I understand your criticism of him and I think it's valid to a degree but it also ignores the idea of any upside he has.   
    • 440 ML players have 100+ PAs this year. Norby is 404/440 in Exit Velocity and coincidentally 404/440 in Contact% So he doesn't put his bat on the ball and when he does, he doesn't hit it hard. Which (unlike Holliday and Mayo) is completely in line with his poor Exit Velocity and Contact% in AAA. He's not a good defender either. Norby is a bad baseball player and we're better off with Livan Soto and Emmanuel Rivera.
    • Norby has been coming back down to earth. He's 2-23 with 10 Ks and no extra base hits over the past week. OPS has dropped over 100 points. Currently .784
    • It was a great trade!! 🤣
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...