Jump to content

The Upcoming 'Tony-OH Expose' Timeline...


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This maybe a dumb question, but is Tony's expose going to available to all of the OH or just plus-members?

If Tony has any commercial sense, it'll only be for plus members. And his plus subscriptions should increase dramatically!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh the irony...

<img src="http://api.photoshop.com/home_94da8c9fb8f2436d98b4c7246258b6e0/adobe-px-assets/3d1a7ac30aff49d896e0c7d512888a7d" width="633" height="356"/>

Anyone notice how MacPhail looks like the warden from Shawshank Redemption?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to feel a little bad for Tony. He's got to be in a tough position here -- wanting to protect his sources and still share some amazing information with the Hangout. Maybe he will really be able to spill the beans, but I just hope everybody remembers the Titanic analogies if Tony cannot go much further than identifying the tip of the iceberg that has crippled us. There would have to be A LOT more beneath the surface.

I can't wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a bad feeling the news is going to be something like... Angelos is trying to de-value the team by keeping payroll down, not speding on scouting and development, etc. so that his son will be able to afford the inheritance tax when he takes over. I would think this would be the worst case scenario. But then again, everytime I think this team is in a "worst case scenario", I am proven wrong, because it's actually even worse than I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a bad feeling the news is going to be something like... Angelos is trying to de-value the team by keeping payroll down, not speding on scouting and development, etc. so that his son will be able to afford the inheritance tax when he takes over. I would think this would be the worst case scenario. But then again, everytime I think this team is in a "worst case scenario", I am proven wrong, because it's actually even worse than I thought.

I dont think thats the case at all. I believe that part of the deal in getting the expos to DC was that MLB would gaurantee the O's would be worth a certain amount, like 600m or somthing to that effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something like this is really what the Orioles need. Things will never get better if the problems are continually buried.

The more and more I see of this, the more I think this franchise will never improve until it's sold. There just doesn't seem to be an ability to cut out the cancer with the same moron in ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...