Jump to content

The Upcoming 'Tony-OH Expose' Timeline...


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I have always said that this team will never win under the Angelos rule and that I would not financially support this team until he is gone. I have probably been to 5 games in the past 12 years, of which all but 1 or 2 were on the road.

Until he is gone, I will maintain my ways. At this point, I am not afraid to admit it, but Angelos has driven my once strong financial support and Oriole fervor completely away. I loathe Angelos and this entire Front Office. At this point, I am basically despondent and completely apathetic.

I certainly don't "hate" the Orioles, but I most certainly have not cared about this team for the past decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony, I wonder if you could answer this one question? If not, I certainly 100% understand.

Is our angst and anger at MacPhail justified, or is he just the target of our misguided anger?

This is my guess, but he brought in MacPhail because he is very tight lipped and the person who is actually running this team is still Angelos 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my guess, but he brought in MacPhail because he is very tight lipped and the person who is actually running this team is still Angelos 100%

No way Angelos would have ever signed Gonzalez, nor draft Hobgood last year, so I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony, I wonder if you could answer this one question? If not, I certainly 100% understand.

Is our angst and anger at MacPhail justified, or is he just the target of our misguided anger?

Why so black and white? Every single member of this organization should shoulder a share of the blame; MacPhail included as he's made decisions that have turned out awful. The next question is do you fire AM now and bring in someone else or does he get another offseason to try and improve the sitation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why so black and white? Every single member of this organization should shoulder a share of the blame; MacPhail included as he's made decisions that have turned out awful. The next question is do you fire AM now and bring in someone else or does he get another offseason to try and improve the sitation.

My point is...myself and others are COMPLETELY fed up with how MacPhail is running the team. But, is it really MacPhail who is doing this, or is his hand being forced?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my guess, but he brought in MacPhail because he is very tight lipped and the person who is actually running this team is still Angelos 100%

Then I guess Angelos deserves all the credit for the good things that AM has done and crafting a team that we were all very excited about in March?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I guess Angelos deserves all the credit for the good things that AM has done and crafting a team that we were all very excited about in March?

I love how Angelos gets blamed for the losses, then also gets blamed for being too involved when it said he was against signing Gonzalez and Atkins.

So which one is it people? Are we mad at AM or PA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I guess Angelos deserves all the credit for the good things that AM has done and crafting a team that we were all very excited about in March?

To be honest, I was not all that excited. This team had to lean on kids in the AL East. I thought playing .500 was probably a stretch. I thought maybe 75 wins, tops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Angelos gets blamed for the losses, then also gets blamed for being too involved when it said he was against signing Gonzalez and Atkins.

So which one is it people? Are we mad at AM or PA?

Well, PA hired AM.

Look, if this was a publicly traded company and PA was the CEO, he would have been out on the street 10 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I guess Angelos deserves all the credit for the good things that AM has done and crafting a team that we were all very excited about in March?

You mean the credit for the good things that ended up being not good things, because the team that we thought would be decent stinks? If you're a GM who assembles a team that you believe to be in good shape...but the team ends up stinking...maybe you need to change what you believe will work. And, the pre-season opinions of a message board shouldn't really be validation that your 'plan' works. He was wrong. We were wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony, I wonder if you could answer this one question? If not, I certainly 100% understand.

Is our angst and anger at MacPhail justified, or is he just the target of our misguided anger?

When the piece comes out you'll be able to make your own conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...