Jump to content

So, I guess Buck's honeymoon is over?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Thanks, and I forgot one: our bullpen has an 11-10 record. Yep, as mediocre as the group is, and with only three guys who are worth a damn, Buck has somehow nursed that group into a winning record.

And of course, that just reinforces my opening point about the starting pitching, which is 24-32 and forces the bullpen to pitch 3.2 innings per game.

I'll note than an average bullpen has a record significantly better than .500 because of the nature of the win rule. A starter can't get a win when he goes less than five innings, but he can lose. So almost all come-from-behind wins are credited to the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm surprised to come on here and not see people questioning Buck last night.

Bottom of the 8th, one out, two on base and down by three runs. Why doesn't he pinch hit for Andino there. Scott was waiting for his shot. What reason do we have to save him, or to leave Andino in the game? Andino promptly GIDP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the honeymoon is over. Trying to be as objective as I can, a 35-43 record in the toughest division in baseball is bad, but not disasterous. Buck has his work cut out for him for the final 84 game of the season. Yes, we'll be asking a lot of him to get this team to finish with a winning record when all is said and done, but that is (the reality of) what we are asking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention a guys like Gregg becomes invested in this sort of system. He is not a better pitcher than koji but will get paid a premium for his role.

That's the part I don't understand. Management has not only been willing to very tightly define how pitchers are used, limiting the number of innings and increasing the number of pitchers required, but on top of that they've made many closers much more highly paid than they otherwise would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised to come on here and not see people questioning Buck last night.

Bottom of the 8th, one out, two on base and down by three runs. Why doesn't he pinch hit for Andino there. Scott was waiting for his shot. What reason do we have to save him, or to leave Andino in the game? Andino promptly GIDP.

I think StL had a lefty warming up in the bullpen in anticipation. I'd guess that Buck was thinking about the L-L matchup, the fact that Scott is hurt and has been hitting poorly, and the fact that Andino was 3-for-3 on the night, and decided to take his chances with Andino. I probably would have gone with Scott there, but I didn't really have a problem with the decision. I was upset when Scott was in the on-deck circle in Reimold's place right before that. If you decide to pinch-hit there, it HAS to be for Andino, not Reimold. Glad he let Reimold hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...